Session Information
Paper Session
Contribution
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have significantly impacted education by providing flexible and self-directed access to thousands of students worldwide. However, the asynchronous environments in which these courses take place present challenges for collaboration and the construction of learning communities. The lack of real-time communication and the difficulty in establishing collaborative work dynamics can affect student motivation and engagement, directly influencing their learning experience and academic performance.
This study seeks to answer the following research question: ¿What are the most effective pedagogical strategies for fostering collaboration in MOOCs within asynchronous virtual learning environments and enhancing students' learning experiences?
The theoretical framework of this research is based on collaborative learning and social constructivism, models that highlight the importance of interaction in the construction of knowledge. In this context, methodological approaches that promote active student participation in digital environments are considered, such as project-based learning, gamification, and the use of technological tools that facilitate teamwork and asynchronous communication. Additionally, principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) are incorporated to ensure that the implemented strategies are accessible and inclusive for a diverse range of students.
From an international perspective, this research analyzes MOOCs offered by various higher education institutions in Europe and Latin America. The aim is to identify strategies that can be replicated in different cultural and educational contexts to optimize teaching and learning models in globalized virtual environments. Comparing experiences from both regions will allow for a better understanding of the factors influencing collaboration and participation in MOOCs, considering variables such as technological infrastructure, digital literacy levels, and students' preferences regarding learning methodologies.
The study follows a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative techniques to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon. Surveys will be conducted with students to measure their perceptions of collaboration and the effectiveness of the implemented pedagogical strategies. Additionally, a content analysis of discussion forums and other collaborative spaces within the courses will be carried out to identify interaction patterns and detect barriers that hinder active participation. Semi-structured interviews will also be conducted with instructors and instructional designers responsible for the planning and execution of the analyzed MOOCs to understand their perspectives on pedagogical practices that foster collaborative work in asynchronous environments.
The purpose of this research is to generate knowledge that contributes to the design of more inclusive, participatory, and effective online courses in terms of collaborative learning. The study's findings are expected to provide practical recommendations for educators, instructional designers, and MOOC platform administrators, guiding the implementation of innovative pedagogical strategies that maximize student interaction and strengthen learning communities in virtual spaces.
This study also aims to contribute to the global discussion on the future of online education, promoting teaching models that meet students' needs and expectations in an increasingly interconnected world. The research will add to the academic debate on how digital education can evolve to be more inclusive, collaborative, and effective, ensuring that MOOCs remain a key tool for the democratization of knowledge in higher education and professional development.
Method
This study adopts a mixed methodological approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze the effectiveness of collaborative strategies in asynchronous MOOCs. The combination of these approaches will provide a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon, considering both participants' perceptions and the analysis of interactions in virtual learning environments. -Quantitative Method Structured surveys will be implemented targeting students who have participated in MOOCs at various universities in Europe and Latin America. These surveys will measure variables such as collaboration perception, frequency of interaction in group activities, and satisfaction with the pedagogical strategies implemented. A Likert scale will be used to evaluate these dimensions, ensuring comparable and analytically robust data. -Qualitative Method To complement the quantitative data, a content analysis will be conducted on discussion forums and other collaborative platforms used in the studied MOOCs. This analysis will identify interaction patterns, barriers to participation, and best practices in collaborative dynamics. Additionally, semi-structured interviews will be conducted with instructors and instructional designers to understand their perspectives on the planning and execution of collaborative strategies in asynchronous environments. Data Collection Instruments • Online surveys directed at students. • Content analysis of discussion forums and collaborative platforms. • Semi-structured interviews with instructors and instructional designers. Data Triangulation To ensure the validity and reliability of the findings, a data triangulation process will be employed by comparing the information obtained through the different methods used. This will allow the corroboration of results and provide a more complete understanding of the most effective strategies to foster collaboration in asynchronous MOOCs. The findings of this research will provide a detailed analysis of collaborative dynamics in MOOCs, contributing with evidence-based recommendations to improve the quality of learning in these digital environments.
Expected Outcomes
The conclusions of this study indicate that some pedagogical strategies to promote collaboration in MOOCs in asynchronous settings should focus on creating interactive environments that encourage active student participation. Project-based approaches, gamification, and the use of technological tools that facilitate asynchronous communication have proven to be effective in fostering collaborative work in these courses. Furthermore, integrating principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is crucial to ensure that the strategies are inclusive and accessible to a diverse range of students, taking into account their needs and learning styles. The expected results suggest that the implementation of these strategies will contribute to greater motivation and engagement from students, improving their learning experience and, consequently, academic outcomes. It is anticipated that students who actively participate in collaborative dynamics, supported by appropriate technology, will experience more meaningful learning, both in terms of knowledge acquisition and socio-emotional skill development. The findings will also highlight contextual differences between MOOCs in Europe and Latin America, allowing the identification of factors that influence collaboration, such as technological infrastructure, digital literacy levels, and methodological preferences. Comparing these variables will provide recommendations for adapting pedagogical strategies to different environments, optimizing the effectiveness of MOOCs in diverse contexts. In summary, this study aims to provide concrete strategies to improve interaction and the learning community in MOOCs, which can transform these environments into more inclusive, dynamic, and collaborative learning experiences, contributing to the advancement of global digital education.
References
Aparicio-Gómez, W. O. (2022). The "MOOC" courses. Ed&TIC. (Translated from Spanish) Caballero Flores, E. H. (2022). Collaborative work and learning strategies in virtual environments: A systematic review. Escuela de Posgrado, Universidad César Vallejo. https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12692/83050/Caballero_FEH-SD.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Translated from Spanish) Cano-Vásquez, L. M., & Ángel-Uribe, I. C. (2023). Students' perspectives on learning experiences in a virtual course and a MOOC. American Journal of Distance Education, 37(2), 133-150. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/08923647.2023.2202596?needAccess=true (Translated from Spanish) Cahuana, H. R. S. (2021). Collaborative learning in virtual environments. Polo del Conocimiento: Revista científico-profesional, 6(11), 46-70. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8219363 (Translated from Spanish) Guzmán, M. C., Albornoz, E. J., & Alvarado, R. (2022). Didactics in virtual learning environments. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 5(1), 96-102. Universidad Metropolitana de Ecuador. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=721778113013 (Translated from Spanish) Quinteros Lascano, L. N., Sangurima Quito, J. M., Paredes Cervantes, M. I., Gavilánez Vásconez, J. G., & Alejandro Criollo, C. R. (2024). Virtual learning environments and their importance in post-COVID-19 asynchronous work. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(1), 6630-6640. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i1.10026 (Translated from Spanish) López-Meneses, E., Gómez-Galán, J., Bernal-Bravo, C., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2020). Strengths and weaknesses of massive open online courses (MOOCs) compared to other teaching models in socio-educational contexts. Formación universitaria, 13(6), 77-84. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718-50062020000600077&script=sci_arttext (Translated from Spanish) Martínez De Miguel López, S., Bernárdez-Gómez, A., & Salmerón Aroca, J. A. (2024). Retrospective analysis of perceptions about tools for developing collaborative activities in virtual environments. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 27(2), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.27.2.38983 (Translated from Spanish) Oñate Julio, D. L. (2023). Technopedagogical design of open environments or MOOCs. Repositori Institucional (O2): Technopedagogical design of open environments or MOOCs. (Translated from Spanish) Pluas, P. M. M., Arcaya, W. W. S., Orlando, F., Navarrete, S., Choez, Y. A. C., & Timbiano, A. V. V. (2024). Design and implementation of a MOOC to strengthen soft skills. Power, 30, 10. https://biblioteca.ciencialatina.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Diseno-e-implementacion-de-un-MOOC.pdf (Translated from Spanish) Romero Córdova, J. F., & Arriazu, R. (2023). Learning of competencies in MOOCs: A systematic literature review. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.22.1.107 (Translated from Spanish) Santillán-Aguirre, J. P., Jaramillo-Moyano, E. M., & Santos-Poveda, R. D. (2021). Cooperative learning as a new methodology in the classroom. Pol. Con., 6(1), 1060-1078. https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v6i1.2207. https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/2207 (Translated from Spanish) Zevallos Vera, E. J., Vilchez Inga, C., Palacios Huaraca, C. R., Garay Santisteban, J. S., Asnate Salazar, E. J., & Pajuelo Villarreal, R. D. P. M. (2023). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) and their influence on types of learning. (Translated from Spanish)
Update Modus of this Database
The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
 This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.