Session Information
23 SES 06 A, Towards Shared Accountability
Symposium
Contribution
In Portugal, policies to promote school success and improve education are rooted on the principles of equality of opportunities and social justice. This paper looks at the TEIP (Educational Territories of Priority Intervention) programme, which was implemented in 1996 and is inspired by similar measures in France, England, and the United States. By granting greater autonomy and implementing positive discrimination measures—such as additional funding, strengthened human resources, and diversified educational offer —the programme aims to enable schools to develop improvement plans tailored to their local contexts, with the primary goal of enhancing educational success. As part of the TEIP programme, schools are provided with resources such as teachers and mediators and alongside learning networks and partnerships with higher education institutions are established. Furthermore, regional teams from the Ministry of Education support participating schools and facilitate the monitoring and evaluation of their educational goals, methodologies, and improvement strategies. Despite these efforts, significant challenges remain, even though the Portuguese education system has improved considerably over the last 25 years and diverse case studies highlight the various benefits of the TEIP (Abrantes et al., 2013; Sampaio & Leite, 2015; Costa & Almeida, 2022). While legislative progress has been made, the uneven implementation of compensatory measures within a top-down accountability framework continues to risk perpetuating inequities, particularly in regions already affected by high rates of school failure and social exclusion (Linda-Hammond, 2007; Silva, 2014). This territorial dimension is particularly critical, as regional disparities — especially in Portugal's inland and border regions — affect access to education, employment opportunities, and public services. Inequalities between regions emphasise the critical importance of addressing social and educational justice, as the structures of society and territory continue to shape life chances (Farrugia, 2013; Furlong et al., 2019). Using a mixed methods approach—including interviews, document analysis, secondary data analysis, and questionnaires (Braun & Clarke, 2013)—this study critically examines the extent to which TEIP promotes educational improvement and social justice in schools in disadvantaged regions of Portugal. Findings indicate that while localized autonomy has facilitated innovative practices, the TEIP accountability structure often fails to capitalise local idiosyncrasies. This may limit the programme’s capacity to address the multidimensional nature of justice, encompassing redistribution, recognition, and representation (Fraser, 2008). This emphasises the importance of shared accountability frameworks in promoting a more democratic educational environment (Smith & Benavot, 2019) and reducing systemic disparities.
References
Abrantes, P., Roldão, C., Amaral, P., & Mauritti, R. (2013). Born to fail? Some lessons from a national programme to improve education in poor districts. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 23(1), 17–38. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. 2013. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide. Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Costa, E. & Almeida, M. (2022). 25 Anos do Programa TEIP em Portugal. IE-UL. Farrugia, D. (2013). Towards a spatialised youth sociology: the rural and the urban in times of change. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(3), 293–307. Fraser, N. (2008). Scales of justice - Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. Herder. Furlong, A., Goodwin, J., O'Connor, H., Hadfield, S. Hall, S., Lowden, K., & Plugor, R. (2019). Young people in the labor market: Past, present, future. Routledge. Sampaio, M. & Leite, C. (2015). A Territorialização das Políticas Educativas e a Justiça Curricular: o caso TEIP em Portugal. Currículo sem Fronteiras, 15, 3, 715-740. Silva, S. M. (2014). Growing Up in a Portuguese Borderland. In: Spyrou, S., Christou, M. (eds) Children and Borders. Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, London. Smith, W.C., Benavot, A. (2019). Improving accountability in education: the importance of structured democratic voice. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 20, 193–205.
Update Modus of this Database
The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.