Almost half of teachers in Europe experience high levels of stress in their work (European Commission, 2021). Teachers often contend with multiple stressors, including excessive administrative duties, overcrowded classrooms, discipline issues, inadequate school and classroom facilities, poor scheduling, and time constraints (García-Carmona et al., 2019). Additionally, the ongoing pressure to meet educational standards, coupled with increasing expectations from parents and the wider community, exacerbates the risk of burnout (García-Carmona et al., 2019).

As teaching is considered a stressful profession, it is not surprising that teachers have been found at risk of burnout (Pyhältö et al. 2021). Burnout is described as a psychological syndrome characterized by exhaustion, depersonalization, and diminished personal accomplishment, resulting from prolonged exposure to stressors in the workplace (Schaufeli et al., 2020). Moreover, teacher burnout is a common phenomenon, with far-reaching consequences for both individual teachers and the broader education system (Bakker & de Vries, 2021; Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2017).

Consequently, it is a phenomenon that has been empirically examined for many decades (Chang, 2009). Although extensive research has been conducted on the consequences and causes of burnout (Demerouti et al., 2021), so far little attention has been paid to the ‘burnout aftermath’, or teachers' return to the classroom after burnout (Ahola et al., 2017). Given the permanent demand for qualified teachers, this represents an important gap in burnout research (Kärkkäinen et al., 2017). It is thus crucial to investigate which factors hinder or promote return to the classroom.

To address this gap, the current study investigates the specific conditions, resources, and challenges that influence teachers' experiences during their reintegration. The research question is formulated as follows: Which enabling and constraining factors do teachers experience when returning to the classroom after burnout?  By exploring these factors encountered by teachers during their return to the classroom, this research aims to contribute valuable insights to the existing literature on burnout in the teaching profession. Understanding the factors that influence teachers' return to the classroom following burnout is essential for developing effective support mechanisms to facilitate successful reintegration after burnout.

This study applies the job demands-resources theory (JD-R; Bakker & Demerouti, 2017) as a framework to explore burnout in the educational context. The JD-R theory is a well-established theory that identifies both job demands and job resources (Demerouti et al., 2001). Furthermore, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of burnout in educational contexts, the current study adopts the framework proposed by Moens and colleagues (under review), which builds further on the JD-R theory by incorporating a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between work and individual characteristics. This approach aligns closely with the International Labour Organization's (ILO, 1986) definition of psychosocial factors, which emphasizes the dynamic interactions among the (1) work organisation, (2) work design, (3) working conditions, (4) physical working environment, and (5) labour relations. These psychosocial factors are recognized as influential determinants of health, work performance, and job satisfaction through the workers' perceptions and experiences (Moens et al., under review). In addition to these five factors, personal and contextual factors are also included in the current study.

While much is known about the causes and symptoms of burnout, less attention has been paid to the challenges teachers face when returning to the classroom after a period of burnout. This study attempted to address this gap in the literature by examining the experiences of ten teachers who experienced burnout and subsequently resumed teaching. As experiences of burnout and subsequent return to the classroom are inherently subjective and context-dependent, semi-structured interviews were used. These interviews were conducted with each participant to explore their experiences of burnout and return to teaching. The interviews were audio-recorded with participants' consent and transcribed verbatim. These were then analysed using thematic analysis, following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-step approach. This method ensures a systematic examination of the data to identify, analyse, and report patterns. Recruitment of participants is conducted through a call on social media platforms, providing a brief overview of the research objectives and inviting interested teachers to participate. Prospective participants are asked to complete an online questionnaire to check eligibility based on their burnout experiences. Criteria for participation in the study included a history of burnout during one's teaching career and a willingness to share their experiences through semi-structured interviews. The participants in this study consisted of ten teachers who have experienced burnout during their teaching careers. Burnout was not established through a diagnosis, but teachers reported having burnout. Of these ten participants, nine are female. The participants taught across various grades in secondary education, with a mix of teachers from general, technical, and vocational secondary education settings working in different grades. Furthermore, their return to teaching varied between 1 month and 18 months, with one teacher also having a specific trajectory.

The findings of this study reveal the complexity of the burnout aftermath for teachers and highlight the need for a multifaceted, personalized approach to reintegration. Teachers emphasized the importance of phased returns, where responsibilities are gradually increased over time. Reducing non-core tasks during the initial stages allows for a smoother transition back into the teaching environment. A recurring theme in the data was the critical role of support systems. Professional support, such as therapy or counseling, was instrumental in helping teachers process their burnout experiences. Emotional support from colleagues and understanding school leaders created a safe and welcoming environment that facilitated their return. Structural changes also played a key role in successful reintegration. Adjustments such as flexible scheduling, manageable workloads, and clear communication about expectations were particularly valued by participants. These factors, combined with a sense of acknowledgment and recognition from school leaders, fostered a more positive experience during their return. This study provides new insights into the post-burnout experiences of teachers, contributing to the broader literature on teacher well-being. By addressing workload challenges, fostering supportive environments, and implementing phased reintegration policies, schools and policymakers can better support teachers returning after burnout. A holistic and tailored approach to reintegration is essential to promote teacher well-being and ensure their long-term retention in the profession.

Ahola, K., Toppinen-Tanner, S., & Seppänen, J. (2017). Interventions to alleviate burnout symptoms and to support return to work among employees with burnout: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Burnout Research, 4, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2017.02.001 Bakker, A., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056 Bakker, A. B., & de Vries, J. D. (2021). Job demands–resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 34(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Chang, M. (2009). An Appraisal Perspective of Teacher Burnout: Examining the Emotional Work of Teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9106-y Demerouti, E., Bakker, A., Peeters, M., & Breevaart, K. (2021). New directions in burnout research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(5), 686–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1979962 European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2021). Teachers in Europe: Careers, Development and Well-being. Eurydice report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. García-Carmona, M., Marín, M., & Aguayo, R. (2019). Burnout syndrome in secondary school teachers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 22, 189-208. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s11218-018-9471-9 Kärkkäinen, R., Saaranen, T., Hiltunen, S., Ryynänen, O., & Räsänen, K. (2017). Systematic review: Factors associated with return to work in burnout. Occupational Medicine, 67(6), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqx093 Moens, M., Vanblaere, B., Devos. G., & Tuytens, M. (2025). Teacher wellbeing in schools: a systematic review of job demands and job resources. Submitted to Journal of Psychology in the schools Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., Haverinen, K., Tikkanen, L., & Soini, T. (2021). Teacher burnout profiles and proactive strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(1), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00465-6 Schaufeli, W., Desart, S., & De Witte, H. (2020). The Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) – Development, validity and reliability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249495 Skaalvik, E., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Dimensions of teacher burnout: Relations with potential stressors at school. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 20(4), 775–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9391-0