Session Information
22 SES 13 B, Re-thinking Professional Formation: Towards New Imaginaries (Part 2)
Symposium, continues from 22 Ses12 B
Contribution
Despite the general recognition that critical thinking is one of the most important outcome of higher education (Barnett2003, Englund 2008), what critical thinking entails or should imply is itself contested (Pithers and Soden 2001, Sullivan and Rosin 2008, Turner, 2005). The aim of this paper is to create a map of different ways of defining and contextualizing critical thinking in scholarly discussion in teacher and nurse education. This is approached through an analysis of how the concept of critical thinking is elaborated in international peer-reviewed journals during 2005-2010. The paper examines the different frames of references presented in the different articles by looking at their main theoretical position, key terms used to define the boundaries of critical thinking and the normative stand taken towards the concept. One central question is to differentiate between understandings / interpretations of critical thinking and se how these can be related to different traditions of bildung, liberal education as well as vocational education.
Method
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.