An Emerging Network – Can Research for Education for Sustainable Development Champion Freedom, Education and Development for All?
Author(s):
Alison Neilson (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Research Workshop

Session Information

ERG SES F 05, Educational Research

Parallel paper session

Time:
2012-09-18
09:00-10:30
Room:
FCEE - Aula 2.5
Chair:
Des Hewitt

Contribution

Regardless of the name chosen, theories or discourse fostered, education related to sustainability (or “environment”), one of the biggest challenges is to disrupt the normative hegemonic practices of “education” and “research” that create economic and social disparities which, among other things fuel unsustainable living (Dorling, 2010). Research conferences can also be places of some of the same normative practices which privilege transmission, technical and reductionist ways of thinking, disembodied knowing, and other approaches which promote “unsustainability” (cf. Freire, 1970; Gadotti, 2008). Concern for the difficulties of postnormal times has brought forth calls for the use of creative methods (Montuori, 2011; Sandar, 2010) and in many fields of education, research fosters greater equity and champions freedom, education and development for all through such creativity (see Barndt, 2011; Cavanagh, 2000). Within and between the various fields of environmental and sustainability education, however, there has been much discussion and conflict and many have pointed out that “global inequality, cultural differences, as well as conceptual confusions inherent in the concept make the idea of global sustainability and the role of education problematic (Cartea, 205; Dei, 1993; Jickling, 2005; Power, 2003; Trainer, 1990)” (Manteaw, 2009, p. 166). This interactive session will explore the ways that delegates at an educational research conference (this one – ECER 2012) understand sustainability education and related research. They will be invited to explore the landscape of this field of research as initially outlined by the presenters (see Beringera, & Adomßenta, 2008;  Mulà & Tilbury, 2011; Paden& Chhokar, 2007; Pipere, Reunamo & Jones, 2010; Talwar, Wiek & Robinson, 2011; Wright, 2007). This is an invitation to interact with the landscape, to add, to suggest deletions, to offer different parameters, to support and to question (the need, the words, the definitions of the words, the language, the colours used). This interaction also offers the opportunity for self-reflection on practices of research, education and conference structure and how one engages within a research conference.

Method

This facilitated brain-storming session blurs the lines between process and outcome of research, between education and research, and between expert and non-expert (Arnold et al., 1991; marino, 1997). The activities are based on principles of participatory inquiry (Reason, 1998). Art, images and creative text will help embrace complexity and ambiguity in order to disrupt unequal privilege (Neilson, 2008) and transcend cultural differences (Cajete, 1994) something particularly important within a European context of cross-country interacting/imposed educational policies. This interactive session will invite input during this session and share information on the current status of research for education for sustainable development (and EE). Subsequent to the emerging scholars pre-conference, the interactive mural will go on display to invite further interaction from the delegates to the main conference and then form a starting point for discussing the creation of a new network for research related to environmental/sustainability education.

Expected Outcomes

This will result in a visual presentation of ideas from conference participants as to the interest in a network for environmental/sustainability education. As well, there will be input related to how this type of education can champion freedom and development. This will help inform the organizers of this new network as they begin the process of creating the network. Questions to be addressed include: How can a network focused on environmental and sustainability education emerge at ECER? What are the ways that this type of education can champion freedom, education and development for all? How do education researchers perceive environmental and sustainability education? What are the opportunities? What are the challenges?

References

Barndt, D. (Ed.) (2011). Viva! Community arts and popular education in the Americas. Toronto, ON: Between the Lines. Beringera, A., & Adomßenta, M. (2008). Sustainable university research and development: inspecting sustainability in higher education research. Environmental Education Research, 14(6), 607-623. Cavanagh, C. (2000). ‘Naming the Moment’ A participatory process of political analysis for action. Participatory Learning and Action Notes 38, 73-76. Dorling, D. (2010). Opinion: Social inequality and environmental justice. Environmental Scientist, 9-13. Freire, P. (1970). Pedogogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum. Gadotti, M. (2008) Education for sustainability: A critical contribution to the Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Green Theory & Praxis: The Journal of Ecopedagogy, 4(1), 15-64. Manteaw, B. (2009). Living in and off the environment: Educating for sustainable development in an unequal world. In David B. Zandvliet (Ed.). Diversity in Environmental Education Research. pp 159-176. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. marino, d. (1997). Wild garden: Art, education and the culture of resistance. Toronto, ON: Between the Lines. Mulà, I. & Tilbury, D. (eds.). (2011). National Journeys towards Education for Sustainable Development. Paris: UNESCO. Paden, M. & Chhokar, K. B. (2007). Exploring research priorities for the DESD. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 1(1), 73-75. Pipere, A., Reunamo, J., & Jones, M. (2010). Perceptions of research in education for sustainable development: an international perspective. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 1(2), 5-24. Reason, P. (1998). Three approaches to participatory inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & U. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry. (pp. 261-291), Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage. Talwar, S., Wiek, A., & Robinson, J. (2011). User engagement in sustainability research Science and Public Policy, 38(5), 379-390. Wright, T. (2007). Higher education for sustainability: Developing a comprehensive research agenda. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(1), 101–106.

Author Information

Alison Neilson (presenting / submitting)
University of the Azores, Portugal

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.