In the Minds of International Educators – Making Sense of Pedagogical Narratives
Author(s):
Meeri Hellsten (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 06 C, Academic Work and Professional Development

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-19
15:30-17:00
Room:
FFL - Aula 27
Chair:
Mari Karm

Contribution

Pedagogical reflections concerned with intercultural and international education is currently attracting attention among scholars. The focus on self-studies is one of the self-imposed measures undertaken in an attempt at making sense of a pedagogical uncertainty that has developed as a result of the vast and in some cases volatile expansion of the global education arena during the past decades.

While a large bulk of research into internationalization of higher education has been concerned with quantitative paradigms, in terms of their impact on market economies and their fluctuations relative to globalization (see e.g. Marginson, 2005), its pedagogical impact remains comparatively unexplored (Svensson and Wihlborg, 2010).

Both quantitative and qualitative research paradigms are beneficial for furthering research into intercultural education matters. What is at issue however, among those highly committed to the continued benefits of this enterprise, concerns to what extent it advocates high quality pedagogy and curriculum delivery including assessment, which is concurrently (inter-)culturally sustainable. Further cross-cultural investigations are needed, that examine pedagogical impact in professionally meaningful ways.

This presentation aims at providing a contribution to the pedagogical, didactic and professional conceptualizations involved in intercultural and international education practices in times of change. The study aims at articulating pedagogical visions, awareness and aspirations and perceived didactic capabilities through the use of narrative accounts (see e.g. Trahar, 2011) of senior academics incumbent of the field. It stems from years of international collaborative research (Ninnes & Hellsten, 2005; Hellsten & Reid, 2008; Hellsten & Goldstein-Kyaga, 2011) investigating pedagogical quality within international teaching and learning communities.

Schön’s (2005) theory of reflective practitioners in combination with principles of narrative inquiry (Trahar, 2011) provide a solid framework upon which to rest the rationale.  The groundbreaking analyses that Schön declared as reflection-in action, described the function of professional (and other) life-histories being made up of a synchronized sense-making activity. In this process a deeper contemplation and self-scrutiny is called into action without which it is meaningless to recognize work satisfaction, let alone reach higher levels of professionalization. In the intercultural education research field, narrative inquiry is gaining ground as a method which, among other things, claims that human action is essentially predicated upon it being narrated, or ‘storied’ and necessarily interrelational. As such, social lives are constructed around the need to be ‘told’. The combination of narration and reflective action becomes a powerful device with which to glean insights into how pedagogy in and for international and intercultural education fields is accomplished-in-action.

Method

The presentation problematizes the issue of quality pedagogy in international and intercultural contexts by involving the audience in reflective activity. The narratives to be presented have been collected through interviews with and written contributions by senior university lecturers residing and working across world continents, and in as many languages, and who are involved in intercultural and international education. Both gender groups are reppresented and the ages and years of experience of participants vary. The issues raised in the narratives centre around the topic of inquiry, being: development of professional career, public and private anecdotal examples that describes the development of sense of self professionally, any relationship of the above on the development of academic identity, the impact of language and/or mentors on this development, and the ways in which some of the above stories come into expression in pedagogic action. The analytic method draws on four analytic purposes presented by Somers and Gibson (1994): ontological, public, conceptual and meta-narratives, to which has been added a fifth intercultural dimension expressed by Lundegård and Wickman (2009) as ‘disjunctive space’, a concept they borrowed from Biesta.

Expected Outcomes

The paper concludes by presenting some implications for considering possible futures and developing future pedagogies through a reflective and collective mindset of intercultural communities of scholars.

References

References Hellstén, M., and Reid, A. (2008) (eds.), Researching International Pedagogies: sustainable practice for teaching and learning in higher education, Dordrecht, NL: Springer. Lundegård, I., and Wickman, P-O. (2009). Identity transformation in Education for Sustainable Development: A Question of Location. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 5, pp. 461-479. Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52, pp. 1-39. Ninnes, P., and Hellstén, M. (2005) (eds.), Internationalizing Higher Education: critical perspectives on pedagogy and policy, Dordrecht, NL: Springer. Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective practitioner: how professionals think in Action. New York: Basic Books. Somers, M., and Gibson, G. D. (1994). Reclaiming the Epistemological ‘Other’: Narrative and the Social Constitution of Identity. In Calhoun, C., Social Theory and the Politics of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell. Svensson¹, L & Wihlborg¹, M. (2010). Internationalising the Content of Higher Education. Higher Education . Vol, 60, No 6, pp. 595-613. Trahar, S. (ed). 2011. Learning and Teaching Narrative Inquiry. Travelling in the Borderlands. Studies in Narrative 14. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Author Information

Meeri Hellsten (presenting / submitting)
Sodertorn University
Education
Huddinge

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.