The Relationship between Fears of and Attitudes toward Stray Dogs in a University Campus
Author(s):
Busra Tuncay (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES B 14, Higher Education

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-17
11:00-12:30
Room:
FCEE - Aula 4.9
Chair:
Jani Petri Ursin

Contribution

As for most environmental management efforts, attitudes are one of the key concepts that should be considered in the context of conservation projects regarding animals because they are influential for the level of commitment and support that people provide for the related legislations and other management strategies (Lindsey, du Toit, & Mills, 2005). Moreover, positive environmental attitudes are listed among the most frequently stated learning outcomes that environmental education programs aim to achieve in order to contribute to the protection of natural resources and the diversity of life forms (Barney, Mintzes, & Yen, 2005). Therefore, it can be inferred that investigating attitudes of people toward animals together with the factors underlying those attitudes would contribute to the success of corresponding environmental conservation efforts and educational programs. Correspondingly, when the related literature is examined it will be noticed that ‘fear’ is frequently referred to explain differences in people’s attitudes toward animals. For instance, one of the attitudinal dimensions in Kellert’s (1996) scale regarding attitudes toward wildlife and the environment was named as ‘negativistic’ attitude dimension and was characterized as an active avoidance of animals as a result of dislike or fear.

At this point, the present study is believed to provide a suitable context to investigate the relationship between fear of and attitudes toward animals. That is to say, the study is carried out in a university which is located on a natural area where many species of wild animals and a large number of stray dogs inhabit. Management of these stray dogs is such a controversial environmental issue that no consensus has been reached among the members of the university. While some state their desire to live in harmony with the dogs of the campus, some others exhibit negative attitudes arguing that they do not feel themselves safe in the campus due to the stray dog attacks. Actually, research shows that experience with animals are influential in fear patterns of people regarding those animals (Røskaft, Bjerke, Kaltenborn, Linnell, & Andersen, 2003). Accordingly, in the present study having witnessed a dog attack was taken as an indicator of higher fear towards dogs and was used to test the relationship between fear of and attitudes toward dogs. Based on research findings revealing the effects of negative experiences on people’s attitudes towards animals, a statistically significant difference in the attitudes of the participants towards dogs was hypothesized in favor of the ones who had not witnessed any dog attack in the campus.

The reason for studying attitudes toward dogs and testing its relationship with fear in a local context is mostly based on suggestions of previous researchers. For instance, Kortenkamp and Moore (2001) stated that using environmental issues that respondents are more familiar, more likely to encounter and more likely to make decisions about would reveal more accurate information. Therefore, respondents of the present study are believed to reflect their actual attitudes towards dogs since they are very familiar with the environmental issue regarding the stray dogs in the campus.

Method

The participants of the study were a convenience sample of 75 pre-service teachers and 19 teacher educators in education faculty of the university where the study is conducted (Nmale=18, Nfemale=76).Mean age of the participants was 23.2 with a standard deviation of 2.44. For data collection, the participants’ attitudes toward dogs were measured by means of a 10 item questionnaire written in the form of a 5-point Likert type scale (1= strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree). Five items of the questionnaire were taken and adapted from Dolphin Attitude Inventory of Barney, Mintzes, and Yen (2005) and the remaining five items were added by the researcher in accordance with the context of the study after taking expert opinion. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of this 10-item questionnaire was calculated as .89 suggesting a very good reliability value (Pallant, 2007).In addition to the questionnaire, the participants were asked whether they had witnessed any dog attack in the campus or not.Based on previous research findings revealing the effect of negative experiences on people’s fear toward animals, having witnessed a stray dog attack was assumed to be an indicator of higher fear and used to test the hypothesis of the study by means of independent samples t-test.

Expected Outcomes

Analysis of the collected data revealed that pre-service teachers and teacher educators who participated in the study tended to have positive attitudes toward dogs (M=3.1). When the details of the findings were investigated, it was noticed that the respondents exhibited positive attitudes toward dogs mostly because they are ‘part of the nature’ (M=4.2), ‘best friends of people’ (M=3.6), and ‘graceful’ (M=3.6). In addition, according to the independent-samples t-test, attitudes of the respondents who had not witnessed any dog attack were significantly more positive than the ones who had (t(78) = -3.44, p= .001). Based on findings, which reveal the effect of negative experiences on people’s attitudes towards animals, some suggestions can be proposed to environmental educators as well as to those who deal with environmental conservation programs.For instance, as also stated by Røskaft et al. (2003), environmental education programs can be designed in such a way that they help individuals to reduce their fear and develop positive attitudes toward animals by providing positive and non-threatening experiences. Utilizing this approach will also contribute to the success of environmental conservation efforts since positive attitudes toward the environment, including all individual species, are found to be influential in people’s positions regarding environmental issues.

References

Barney, E. C., Mintez, J. J., & Yen C. (2005). Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward charismatic megafauna: The case of dolphins. The Journal of Environmental Education ,36(2), 41-55. Kellert, S. R. (1996). The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Washington, DC: Island Press. Kortenkamp, K. V., & Moore, C. F. (2001). Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 261-272. Lindsey, P. A., du Toit, J. T., & Mills, M. G. L. (2005). Attitudes of ranchers towards African wild dogs Lycaon pictus: Conservation implications on private land. Biological Conservation, 125(1), 113-121. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Buckingham: Open University Press. Røskaft, E., Bjerke, T., Kaltenborn, B., Linnell, J. D. C., & Andersen, R. (2003). Patterns of self-reported fear towards large carnivores among the Norvegian public. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 184-198.

Author Information

Busra Tuncay (presenting / submitting)
Giresun University/Middle East Technical University
Elementary Education
Ankara

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.