Adult Learners’ Motivations and Barriers to Participation in Higher Education
Author(s):
Zoltan Tozser (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES F13, Adult learning

Parallel paper session

Time:
2012-09-18
09:00-10:30
Room:
FCEE - Aula 4.8
Chair:
Ludger Deitmer

Contribution

This presentation, based on review of international (English) and Hungarian literature, aims to reveal the theories, which might explain the participation of adult learners in higher education (HE) institutions. Furthermore, based on qualitative interviews, it aims to reveal those motivational factors and barriers which influence their participation.

The research investigates the following questions: Who are the adult learners who decide to study in HE institutions? What are the motivational factors, which lead them to study in adulthood? Which social influence factors (such as age, class, marital status, employment status) affect motivation to participate? What are the barriers they have to face? Which theory can be used to understand their decisions to pursue HE studies? How can their participation be explained?

The research raises important theoretical considerations about the role of part-time adult learners in higher education institutions. Explanations of part-time adult learners’ participation can be categorized into three groups: 1.) Social perspectives, 2.) Economic perspectives, and 3.) Individual’s interactions with social influences.

Social perspectives are concerned with life situation, participation, institutional barriers and participation. Economic perspectives are based on the assumption that individuals make rational choices to participate or not This decision is based on the information they have concerning the costs and benefits of participation. Individuals’ interactions with social influences focus on social and individual forces and their interaction (Desjardins 2010). These theories include: the power-load-margin model (McClusky 1963), the needs of hierarchy theory (Maslow 1954), force-field theory (Miller 1967), the congruence theory (Boshier 1971), the expectancy valence model (Rubenson 1975)and the chain-of-response model (Cross 1981).

Moreover, life-transition theory (Aslanian & Bricknell 1980), reference group theory (McGivney 1993, Gooderham 1987) and social participation theory (Cookson 1987) are also important theories giving explanations to participation.

In addition to these concepts, there are also composite theories: the recruitment paradigm (Rubenson 1977), and the psychosocial interaction model (Darkenwald & Merriam 1982).

On the other hand, non-participation is explained by 1.) situational barriers 2.) institutional barriers and 3.) dispositional barriers. Situational barriers arise from one’s situation in life such as lack of time because of work and/or family responsibilities. Institutional barriers are practices and procedures that hinder participation such as fees or limited course offerings. Dispositional barriers are attitudes and dispositions towards learning (Cross 1981). A fourth category, informational barriers, refers to a lack of information on education and training offers and benefits (Rubenson 2010).

Method

As part of the research I first gathered several international (English) and Hungarian publications dealing with theories of participation in adult higher education and then selected the most frequently cited and most relevant literature. I summarised the possible interpretations of participation and non-participation in adult learning activities. In the second phase of the research I made 26 qualitative interviews with adult part-time students at the University of Debrecen, Hungary. The questions revealed important information about their social background, their study and work experiences after finishing secondary school, their first degree(s) if any, the evaluation of their current part-time education program, their motivations and barriers during their studies and the relationship between work, family and community life. Moreover, it revealed their higher education studies, financial aspect of their studies, expectations about the outcomes and further plans for additional studies. The special focus of these semi-structured interviews was on part-time students’ motivations and barriers to participation in higher education.

Expected Outcomes

Results suggest that the most significant factor of adult learners’ participation is related to labour market motivations, i. e. part-time adult learners either want to find a (better) job, keep their jobs, strengthen their position or want carrier advancement. Other motivation factors also play an important role in adult learners’ participation. Many adult learners mentioned that they liked acquiring knowledge, getting new skills and widening their perspectives. In addition, social motivation factors such as social contact, social stimulation and community service also played an important role in some of the adult learners’ participation. The most frequently mentioned constraints were situational and secondly institutional barriers. Adult learners complained about cost of education. However, some of them were supported financially by their employers. Time, on the other hand, was also a challenge for many students as most of them had either worked parallel to their studies or had family and/or community responsibilities. Institutional barriers were also mentioned such as the place of education, the student office and the e-system of the university. Some complained about lack of adequate assessment methods and others about the content of the curriculum and lack of practical experience. Dispositional barriers, however, were not mentioned as negative forces.

References

Aslanian, C. – Brickness H. (1980): Americans in Transition: Life Changes as Reasons for Adult Learning. New York. College Entrance Examination Board. Boshier, R. W. (1971): Motivational Orientations of Adult Education Participants: A Factor Analytic Exlploration of Houle’s Typology. In Adult Education 21 (2) pp. 3-26. Cookson, P. S (1987): The Nature of the Knowledge Base of Adult Education: the Example of Participation. Educational Considerations V. XIV. Cross, K., P. (1981): Adults as Learners. Increasing Participation and Facilitating Learning. San Francisco, Jossey - Bass. Darkenwald, G. G. – Merriam S. B. (1982): Adult Education: Foundations of Practice. London, Harper and Row. Desjardins R. (2010): Participation in Adult Learning. In Peterson, P. – Baker, E – McGaw, B (eds): International Encyclopedia of Education. Third Edition. Elsevier – Academic Press. pp. 240-250. Gooderham P. (1987): Reference group theory and adult education. In Adult Education Quarterly 37 (3) pp. 140-151. Maslow, A. H (1954): Motivation and Personality. New York, Harper & Row. McClusky, H. Y. (1963): The cours of adult life span. In Hallenback, W. C. (ed.): Psychology of Adults, Washington, DC: Adult Education Association. pp. 10-20. McGivney V. (1993): Participation and non-participation: a review of the literature. In Edwards R – Sieminksi S. – Zeldin D. (eds): Adult Learners, Education and Training. London – New York, Routledge. Miller, H. L. (1967): Participation of Adults in Education: A Force-field Analysis. Boston, MA: Center for Study of Liberal Education of Adults. Rubenson K (1977): Participation of Adults in Education: A Force-Field Analysis. Center for Study of Liberal Adult Education, University of Boston. Rubenson, K. (2010): Adult education overview. In Peterson, P. – Baker, E – McGaw, B (eds): International Encyclopedia of Education. Third Edition. Elsevier – Academic Press. (1-11. p.) Rubenson, K. (1975): Participation in Recurrent Education. Paris. CERI-OECD.

Author Information

Zoltan Tozser (presenting / submitting)
University of Debrecen, Hungary, CHERD-Hungary

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.