Perspectives and practices affecting the realisation of the strategy to achieve equal access to quality education for Roma
Author(s):
Rosa Drown (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES C 02, Equal Opportunities

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-17
13:30-15:00
Room:
FCEE - Aula 2.2
Chair:
Alison Neilson

Contribution

Background:

Problems associated with education of Roma children in Central and Eastern Europe have been well documented since the fall of communism twenty years ago, with many children never having attended school or dropping out before they are literate. In Romania, despite a government  strategy to improve "access to quality education" for Roma, initiated in 2001, reports such as Schvey et al. (2006), Fleck & Ruhiniș (2008), Şandru (2009) and the Open Society Institute (OSI) (2007& 2009) suggest that there has been little or no improvement.

 The concepts of 'equal access' and 'quality' education are not only open to different interpretations across different languages and cultures, but also in literature their meanings have been the subject of much debate. The government's strategy,however, has some roots in the 'Education for All' (EFA) initiative which was launched in Jomtien. 

In a document, "Ten goals for improving access to education for Roma", The OSI European Union Monitoring and Advocacy Program for Roma Initiatives suggest that data collection methods  need to be developed by Governments in order to monitor the effects of policies and hence take corrective action where necessary. This paper suggests that as well as quantifying results on a national scale, research is urgently needed into what is actually happening within local administrations and, more importantly, in schools. Unless those responsible for carrying out reforms on the ground, have perspectives and practices which are consistent with the governmental aims emanating from the EFA Initiative, they may work towards different ends that would never achieve the desired result.

Theoretical Perspective:

One of the goals of the EFA initiative promotes equity and refers to being "responsive to children's needs".  These sentiments are also contained within the UN Children's Charter, Article 29, to which Romania is committed,  which states that education should be directed to the education of children "to their fullest potential".

Theorists and researchers, however, suggest that a major problem with Roma education in Europe is an adherence to a 'deficit theory' of education Harvarth&Toma (2006), Claveria & Alonso (2003), Miskovic (2009).  Two alternatives are identified;  ethnocentrism where any failure is because of Roma people's lack of assimilation into the 'superior' culture, and relativism which accepts differences, as cultural, therefore in order to preserve the Roma culture, considers that the status quo should be maintained. Both are inconsistent with the worldview as held by the EFA Initiative and the UN Children's Charter.

Objectives:

Using research findings from my ongoing PhD, which studies the educational system of a small rural region of Transylvania, Romania,  this paper investigates perceptions of educational administrators, teachers, Roma parents and children about the strategy to achieve equal access for Roma.  It compares them with both the worldview represented by EFA and UN and with those suggested by an ethnocentric or  a relativist viewpoint.

It also looks at classroom practices to see whether what is happening either is consistent with the perspectives given by teachers and local administrators or alternatively with the other viewpoints mentioned above.

Method

A mixed-methods case study focuses on the educational provision for a small rural region of Transylvania, comprising two villages with ethnic Romanian, Hungarian and Roma people. Case study methodology is being used in order to provide a detailed understanding of a complex situation. It has a mainly qualitative interpretative approach, with quantitative data being used to further illuminate findings. Qualitative data collection include, semi-structured interviews with children, parents, teachers and administrators, classroom observation and field notes. Quantitative data are collected from structured classroom observation, records of attendance, drop-out and attainment. Thematic analysis of qualitative data is carried out using NVIVO8. Quantitative data are used to provide descriptive statistics about absences and how they relate to days of the week and the weather (issues brought up in interviews), to analyse teacher pupil interaction during lessons and to compare progress of Roma children with that of non-Roma children.

Expected Outcomes

Initial analysis shows that the ethnocentric view is prevalent amongst teachers and local administrators. They consider it is up to the Roma people themselves or other agencies to make the changes. Roma parents also generally accept the view that the school need not change their educational practices - "the situation is there and we have to manage with it." - although some wished that more help was available for their children, implying a similar perspective to the EFA Initiative and UN charter . "Equal access to quality education" is usually understood to mean only that Roma children are permitted to attend the same schools and classes as non-Roma children and that they are treated the same. A minority considered that the school should take measures which considered the specific needs of the Roma children in the way that it teaches or in its curriculum. Within lessons, some teachers paid special attention to the needs of Roma children, one in particular, feeling a tension between this and adherence to the laid down curriculum. Many, however, taught all children the same way, ignoring any specific needs of Roma children.

References

Claveria, J. V. & Alonso, J. G. 2003. Why Romà do not like mainstream schools: Voices of a people without territory Harvard Educational Review 73, 559 - 590. Fleck, G. & Rughinis, C. 2008, Come Closer: Inclusion and exclusion of Roma in Present-Day Society, Bucharest, Human Dynamics. Horvath, I. & Toma, S. 2006, The Roma in Romania General Overview and an Inventory of Problems. Cluj-Napoca: Centrul de Cercetare a Relaţiilor Interetnice (CCRIT). Miskovic, M. 2009. Roma education in Europe: in support of the discourse of race. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17, 201-220. Open Society Institute 2007, Equal Access to Quality Education for Roma. Budapest: Open Society Institute. Open Society Institute 2009, 10 Goals for Improving Access to Education for Roma. Budapest: Open Society Institute. Sandu, R. 2009. Roma and education in Romania: An analysis of educational problems and the actions taken to overcome them. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/22 accessed 170112 Schvey, A. A., Flaherty, M. S. & Higgins, T. E. 2006. The Children Left Behind: Roma Access to Education in Contemporary Romania. Fordham International Law Journal, 29, 1155-1244.

Author Information

Rosa Drown (presenting / submitting)
Southampton University
Education
Isle of Man

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.