Disability and Adult life: Dependence on Financial Social Assistance among Former Students with Special Educational Needs
Author(s):
Jon Olav Myklebust (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

14 SES 08 A, School-related Transitions Within a Life Course Perspective – Later Phases

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-20
09:00-10:30
Room:
ESI 2 - Aula 4
Chair:
Joana Lúcio

Contribution

Young persons in their twenties are expected to be occupied with work or studies. However, people with disabilities and health difficulties may have problems with higher education or finding employment. When they do not succeed in these domains of adult life, they are entitled to different forms of public assistance, e.g., financial social assistance and welfare benefits. This is often the case with vulnerable people, e.g., former students with special educational needs who often encounter difficulties in their transition to adulthood.

This paper analyses which circumstances contribute to dependence on financial social assistance among SEN-students whom we have followed prospectively from their first years in upper secondary school and into their early and late twenties. I want to analyse which variables influence dependence on financial social assistance at two stages of life, in the beginning and in the end of the twenties. The intention is also to examine whether the independent variables have similar or different impact for men and women.

                                                         

This longitudinal study draws inspiration from two complementary fields of knowledge: life span psychology and life course sociology. The first of these includes the proximal context (e.g., family and social relationships), whereas the second approach includes more distal features (e.g., structural and cultural context). The combination of proximal and distal contexts shape the timing and form of the transitions through which the life course is constructed (cf. Bynner, 2008).

 

The life course approach provides a framework for research that helps to identify and formulate research topics and guides the selection of methodological design. This has definitively been the case in the present research project that started in the mid 1990´s (cf. Kvalsund and Myklebust, 1996). An individual’s life course is affected by past events, is influenced by present opportunities or restrictions, and can often be comprehended on the basis of future prospects. The life course is frequently perceived as the sum of those pathways or trajectories (e.g., in education, work, and family life) that individuals and groups follow through historical, geographical, or structural contexts. An example of such a context is the present structure of special education in upper secondary schools in Norway.

 

Today, the life course perspective is increasingly applied to the study of social processes. Naturally, the life course manifests itself not only in the long term but also in the short term, thus making transition the most appropriate concept (cf. Elder and Johnson, 2003:54).Examples of such transitions are when adolescents leave the parental home or when adolescents with special educational needs obtain paid work.

 

Studies of trajectories and transitions require a longitudinal design, which is generally a very expensive approach. Presumably for this reason, most longitudinal studies of adolescents with disabilities have small samples with a restricted time span (see Blossfeld et al., 2009, for a discussion of German longitudinal studies of educational trajectories).   

Method

Longitudinal data collected prospectively are generally considered best for studying processes and outcomes. Using longitudinal data collected prospectively, we may register exactly when various problem conditions appear and what type of support each special needs student receives at that time. For these reasons, a considerable amount of time and money has in recent decades been spent collecting longitudinal data on adolescents with special educational needs in Norway. A research project titled Adult Life on Special Terms provides the data for this article. This research is funded by the Norwegian Council of Research and is an extension of a longitudinal study that started collecting information on special needs students as early as in the spring of 1996. This follow-up sample belongs to a population of more than 2000 special needs students who started upper secondary education in six counties Norwegian counties in the in 1994 and 1995. During four years, class teachers and school counsellors delivered information about these adolescents at least once a year. At the age of 23 years, about 500 of these former special needs students were interviewed by telephone. Five years later close to 400 of them were interviewed once more.

Expected Outcomes

Based on these data, the adaptations to crucial domains of adult life have been analysed, e.g., competence attainment (Myklebust, 2007), employment and economic independence (Myklebust and Båtevik, 2005), and spare-time networks (Kvalsund and Bele 2010). The analyses reveal the significance of a life course perspective, which emphasises how prior conditions and transitions – in education, for example – influence present adaptation. I expect that this approach, combined with multivariate analyses, will help to illuminate why more than a third of these young people depend on public economic support, in their early as well as in their late twenties.

References

Blossfeld, H.P., T. Schneider and J. Doll (2009): Methodological Advances of Panel Studies. Designing the New National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) in Germany. JERO, Vol. 1, No. 1: 10 – 32. Bynner, J. (2008). Developmental Science in the Melting Pot. Journal of Social Issues.Vol. 64, No. 1:219 – 225. Elder, G.H. and M.K. Johnson (2003). The Life Course and Aging: Challenges, Lessons, and New Directions. In R. Settersten (ed.): Invitation to the Life Course. Toward New Understandings of Later Life, 49 – 81. New York: Baywood Publishing Company. Kvalsund, R. and J.O. Myklebust (1996). Nedst ved bordet? Vidaregåande opplæring på særskilde vilkår under Reform 94. [At the End of the Table. Upper Secondary Education on Special Terms during Reform 94]. In J.F. Blichfeldt (ed.): Utdanning for alle? Evaluering av Reform 94. [Education for All? Evaluation of Reform 94] Oslo: Tano Aschehoug. Kvalsund, R. and I.V. Bele (2010). Adaptive situations and social marginalization in early adult life: students with special educational needs. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. Vol. 12, No. 1:59 –76. Myklebust, J.O. (2007). Divergent Paths: Competence attainment among students with special educational needs. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Vol. 11. No. 2: 215–231. Myklebust, J.O. and F.O. Båtevik (2005). Economic Independence for Adolescents with Special Educational Needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education. Vol. 20, No. 3: 271–286.

Author Information

Jon Olav Myklebust (presenting / submitting)
Volda University College
Volda

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.