Signs of Taste for Science: A Methodology for Studying the Constitution of Interest in the Science Classroom
Author(s):
Per Anderhag (presenting / submitting) Per-Olof Wickman (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

27 SES 06 A, Parallel Paper Session

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-19
15:30-17:00
Room:
ESI 3 - Aula m
Chair:
Ingrid Maria Carlgren

Contribution

The backdrop for this paper is the large number of studies on students’ interest in science (e.g. Osborne, Simon, & Collins, 2003; Tytler, Osborne, Williams, Tytler, & Cripps Clark, 2008). Most of these studies are based on secondary reports from students about their experiences of science and science education. The studies are typically using psychologically oriented cognitivist constructs and methodologies. There is thus a need to study also more directly how interest for science is constituted through classroom interactions. The aim of this article is to develop such a methodology, which would make it possible to empirically examine the consequences of various types of classroom interactions for the development of such an interest.

To reach this aim we here use the concept taste as an operational proxy for the more psychologically oriented term interest. This choice is not arbitrary, but made for a number of empirically oriented reasons. First, the term taste designates observable action; people’s taste becomes visible from what they say and what they choose to do. Second, taste does not designate only an affective state of mind, but covers both cognition and values. In this way the concept of taste makes it possible to study how the teaching and learning of the conceptual content of science and the learning of norms and values are made continuous. Third, taste is not a static condition, but something which needs to be constantly construed as part of situated activity.

Our approach to a large extent is based on pragmatically oriented research on aesthetics and taste (Wickman, 2006). Also Pierre Bourdieu has been influential. In his book Distinction: a Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Bourdieu (1984) demonstrates that taste is constituted through people’s upbringings and education. A taste for classical music, for example, is not simply a state of interest, but results from continuously learning cognitively as well as normatively as part of social settings. Hence, as situated socially, a taste for classical music does not mean merely reporting that you are interested in classical music, but entails that you can engage in and take part in classical music communications by making certain linguistic and actional distinctions. Bourdieu’s findings regarding taste should also be relevant for what is usually termed an interest in science.

Method

Since our aim is to develop a methodology for studying the constitution of taste in classroom settings, we needed to find a school where positive instances of this could be found and where the teaching and not only the students’ socio-economic background contributed to their development of taste for science. For this reason we used statistics from the Swedish National Agency for Education and Statistics to locate a suitable lower secondary school (grades 7–9). We actively searched for a school a) where a comparatively high proportion of the students recurrently apply for the natural science program in upper secondary school considering their socio-economic background, and b) where the student population of the school has a heterogeneous socio-economic background. The school chosen qualified in both these respects. Over a two year period 25 % of the students of this school, applied for the natural science program, as compared to the national mean of 15 % for the same period. In Sweden the students choose upper-secondary program during the ninth grade. The natural science program is the upper-secondary school program with a natural science profile and is preparatory for tertiary academic studies.

Expected Outcomes

We developed our methodology in five steps. Firstly, we demonstrate how the constitution of taste can be made visible and coded as the distinctions that students make. Secondly, we display how the values that they attach to their distinctions can be described from their aesthetic judgments. Thirdly, we show how the constitution of taste can be made evident also from humorous interactions in the classroom. Fourthly, the observations of distinctions made need to be situated as part of events or activities with purposes to establish the direction the constitution of taste take in relation to the scientific aims of the class. The meaning of the distinctions made need to be examined from their consequences in relation to the activity as a whole. Finally, we make evident how it can be studied to what degree the constituted taste on the one hand tally with what may be described as the current scientific taste, and, on the other hand, give room for contingent contributions as dependent on the situation and student experiences. We show how this approach can be used for general studies of taste to investigate how it is constituted and learned in the classroom.

References

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049 - 1079. Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G., Tytler, K., & Cripps Clark, J. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the Primary-Secondary school transition. Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Wickman, P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education : learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action: Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Author Information

Per Anderhag (presenting / submitting)
Stockholm University, Sweden
Per-Olof Wickman (presenting)
Stockholm University, Sweden

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.