How Early Childhood Education Relate to Narrative Skills
Author(s):
Zeynep Akdag (presenting / submitting) Zeynep Erdiller
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES F 11, Child development

Parallel paper session

Time:
2012-09-18
09:00-10:30
Room:
FCEE - Aula 4.3
Chair:
John I'Anson

Contribution

The study of communicative competence has extended its scope to investigate more than internalizing grammar, vocabulary or other linguistic devices since language development has been evaluated with competence on longer discourse units such as narratives in recent years (Kang, 2004). Therefore, there has been a renovated interest in the study of narrative development over the past thirty years. This is due to the level of information it maintains concerning social, discursive and traditional condition of people’s life (Bruner, 1991; Quasthoff, 1997). There are no known studies which have been conducted to examine the effect of early childhood education on narrative skills of young Turkish children. Thus, present study is aimed to fill this gap in the field of early childhood education.

How can we identify a good story? A substantial body of research suggests that coherence is the forefront indicator of a good story. Coherence refers to the structure of a story in which sequential events must be linked in a meaningful way (Hudson & Shapiro, 1991). Children are capable of telling basic patterns for familiar events and sequences even though they are not able to describe the sequence of events accurately until about age four (Owens, 2005).

Telling stories is one of the most common activities in preschools since there are formal story telling times in curriculum. Therefore, teachers read storybooks to children and there are informal story telling times such as stories that a child tells to adults to explain an errant behavior or to each other during a play. In spoken or written forms, children are frequently confronted with a broad range of narratives in their everyday lives and in their academic activities (Bloom et al, 2003; Hicks, 1991).

Method

The sample of this study consists of 28 first grade elementary students who had early childhood education and 28 first grade elementary students who did not have early childhood education. Twenty four boys and 32 girls participate in this study and both groups include 16 girls and 12 boys. In order to prevent confusion first grade elementary students who had early childhood education represented as 'ECE' and first grade elementary students who did not have early childhood education as non-ECE in following parts. In this study Mercer Mayer’s (1969) wordless book, Frog Where Are You?, was used to provide a comparable story-telling experience for all children. The book is a wordless picture book which contains no words and consists of 26 separate scenes presented in an order and provides referential elements for the narrative. Stories told by children were separated into clauses then; narrative length was measured by counting the number of clauses included in the stories. After that, the stories were exposed to a story grammar analysis using Labov’s (1972) story grammar models. The use of evaluative devices was measured in stories using nine subtypes of evaluative devices classified by Peterson and McCabe (1983) and adapted by Kang (2003).

Expected Outcomes

Although the t-test results for the narrative length indicated that there are no differences between the narratives of two groups, most of the narratives of non-ECE included clauses, which are the depictions of each component in the picture with no relation among them. On the other hand, stories told by the ECE are more informative, evaluative, and clear than the longer stories of non-ECE. When two groups were compared in terms of structure, the results indicate that the stories narrated by both groups show characteristics of basic structural components suggested by Labov’s (1972) story grammar except for the Abstract and the Evaluation. Again, the Chi-square test results did not suggest that early childhood education made statistically significant difference to produced structured narratives. However, it is observed that ECE produced more informative narratives than the non-ECE. Finally, the results of the Mann-Whitney U test revealed a significant difference between the use of the evaluative devices while narrating in the scores of ECE and non-ECE. The findings ensured that the ECE were much more likely to use mental state of the character, expression of defeat of expectation, character delineation, adverbs and intensifiers in their narratives than the non-ECE.

References

Bruner, J. (1991). The Narrative Construction of Reality. Critical Inquiry,18(1), 1-21. Bloome, D., Katz, L. Champion, T. (2003). Young children’s narratives and ideologies of language in classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 205-223. Hicks, D. (1991). Kinds of narrative: Genre skills among first graders from two communities. In A. McCabe & C. Peterson (Eds.), Developing narrative structure (pp. 55–88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Hudson, J. & Shapiro, L. (1991). From knowing into telling: The development of children’s scripts, stories, stories, and personal narratives. In A. McCabe and C. Peterson (Eds.) Developing Narrative Structure (pp. 89-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Kang, Y. J. (2004). Telling a coherent story in a foreign language: analysis of Korean EFL learners’ referential strategies in oral narrative discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1975-1990. Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York:Puffin Books. Owens, R. E. (2005). Language development: An introduction (4th Ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon. Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. New York: Plenum. Quasthoff, U. (1997). An interactive approach to narrative development. In Michael Bamberg. Narrative development: Six approaches. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

Author Information

Zeynep Akdag (presenting / submitting)
yuzuncu yil university
elementary education
ankara
Bosprohus University, Turkey

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.