Intergenerational Differences in Private Returns to Education in the Context of Tertiary Education Expansion
Author(s):
Miroslav Stefanik (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES F13, Adult learning

Parallel paper session

Time:
2012-09-18
09:00-10:30
Room:
FCEE - Aula 4.8
Chair:
Ludger Deitmer

Contribution

The European Union strategy EUROPE 2020 declares a target of at least 40% of 30-34 year-olds completing third level education. This is just a declaration of a broader trend, when all the most developed countries are increasing their access to higher education (HE). This movement is most often supported by the necessity to increase the supply of educated and thus skilled workforce in order to satisfy the increasing demand for more complex and sophisticated labour. Another point which is often drawn is that HE expansion increases chances for social mobility. Consequently, the expansion of HE became an international trend. Some countries entered this path earlier than others and also their pace in achieving this differs. Due to existing lifecycle patterns the expansion of higher education in the Nineties is consequently increasing the inequality in higher education attainment between generations in the beginning of 21st Century. This trend is especially visible when looking at formal education, particularly formal tertiary education. Tertiary education is mostly gained in young age. The proportion of tertiary education students over 40 years old is increasing but still remains marginal (apx. 4,5% for the EU 27). For this reason, a sharp increase in tertiary education enrolment will increase intergenerational educational attainment differences, caused by different availability of tertiary education for different age cohorts in the time they were in the age usual to enrol into tertiary education.
The starting point of this analysis is presented by the current reality of middle European post socialist countries, such as Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland. These are countries with one of the highest increase in tertiary education accessibility in last 20 years. On the other hand, central planning before 1989 held the accessibility of tertiary education down, because of ideological reasons. This has increased existing differences in tertiary education accessibility between generations.
In contrast to the experience of these countries, we can put the experience of Germany or Spain where only a marginal tertiary education expansion can be observed. Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands present countries where tertiary education expansion of a comparable extend started a little earlier.
Due to demographic waving, in Europe linked with the end of the World War 2, contemporary labour markets in these three countries employ two extensive demographic waves. We can speak about two generations. One is shortly before retirement and the second has just entered the productive age. Proposed article tries to link the experience of selected countries with the dynamics of private returns to education of different generations in the productive age.
The question is, whether tertiary education expansion has affected private returns to education of individuals under 45 years old, for who, due to the expansion, tertiary education was more available. We ask: what are the differences in private returns to education between individuals under and over 45 years old, and what trend can be observed in this respect.

Method

Proposed article looks on private returns to education measured in line with the standard methodology brought by Jacob Mincer (Mincer, 1974). The standard equation was extended to control for context variables such as gender, economic sector or region. To measure educational attainment we use years of schooling as well as attained educational level coded in line with ISCED classification. We estimated the coefficients of returns to education for population younger 45 and over 45. The focus of this analysis is the connection of existing trends and differences in private returns to education between generations with the character of existing HE expansion. For this purpose we need international micro data gathered with the same methodology, such as International Social Survey Project (ISSP) or EU-SILC data. ISSP data allows us to follow the development of private returns to education in selected countries in time during the period from 1995 to 2008 , but it brings various limitations, resulting from a small sample size and differences in income measurement (Flabbi, et al., 2008). EU-SILC data gathers more precise, internationally comparable, information on incomes, but the covered time period is limited from 2004-2010. Micro data from both sources will be exploited.

Expected Outcomes

Employed micro data allow us to draw a picture of intergenerational differences in private returns to education for each of the selected countries. We will look for the linkage between existing intergenerational differences and the character of tertiary education expansion, measured by the OECD “entry rates” indicator. Slovakia presents a good example, where private returns to education of persons under 45 are stable, in contrast to growing private returns to education of persons over 45 years old. This was confirmed on Slovak EU-SILC microdata during the reference period 2004-2009 (Stefanik, 2011). Such diverging trend is in line with an extreme increase in tertiary education availability, starting in the late Nineties. Similar evidence is expected to be found also in Poland. On contrary, most developed countries offer mostly an opposite picture, with private returns to education growing for those under 45 years old. (ISSP data for the US). In general, looking on private returns to education of individuals under and over 45 years old, we have found significant differences between countries. Some European countries offer evidence on diverging returns to education between generations, what is in contrast with the trend observed in other countries.

References

Elias, Peter and Purcell, Kate. 2004. IS MASS EDUCATION WORKING? EVIDENCE FROM THE LABOUR MARKET EXPERIENCE OF RECENT GRADUATES. National Institute Economic Review. 190, 2004, Vol. 60. Flabbi, Luca, Paternostro, Stefano and Tiongson, Erwin R. 2008. Returns to education in the economic transition: A systematic assessment using comparable data. Economics of Education Review. 27, 2008. Keep, E. and Mayhew, K. 2004. The Economic and Distributional Implications of Current Polices on Higher Education. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. Vol. 20, 2004, Vol. 2. Mason, Geoff. 2001. MIXED FORTUNES:GRADUATE UTILISATION IN SERVICE INDUSTRIES. [Discussion Paper No. 182] London : National Institute of Economic and Social Research, 2001. Vol. 182. Mincer, Jacob. 1974. Schooling, Experience and Earnings. National Bureau of Economic Research. New York : Columbia University Press, 1974. OECD. 2009. Education at a Glance. Paris : OECD, 2009. —. 2011. Education at a Glance. Paris : OECD, 2011. —. 2010. Education at a Glance. Paris : OECD, 2010. Stefanik, Miroslav. 2011. Changes in private returns to education caused by the tertiary education. Review of Applied Socio- Economic Research. 2011, 2011, 2, pp. 167-176.

Author Information

Miroslav Stefanik (presenting / submitting)
Slovak Academy of Sciences
Institute of Economic Research
Bratislava

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.