The Social Experiences And Belonging Of Children (Including Those With Behavioural Emotional And Social Difficulties) In Education
Author(s):
Samantha Child (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES C 01, Inclusive Education

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-17
13:30-15:00
Room:
FCEE - Aula 2.1
Chair:

Contribution

The aim of this research is to explore the social experiences of children in education in the UK, some of who have Behavioural, Emotional and Social Difficulties (BESD). International policies (UN 1989; UNESCO 1994) emphasise the rights of all children to be valued equally, treated with respect and provided with equal opportunities. In the UK this has given rise to policy (DfEE 1997) which promotes the rights of children with Special Educational Needs (SEN) to attend their mainstream school wherever possible. Booth and Ainscow (2002) suggest that this is about more than the physical integration of the child into their mainstream class, but about an ethos in which every child is welcomed, valued and supported, fostering positive peer relations and belonging. 

 

The social dimension of education is of importance to young people themselves (Ainscow et al. 1999), and a key factor in parents’ wishes to send their child to a mainstream school (Koster et al. 2009). Maslow (1954) suggests that positive social interaction is also essential for healthy development and wellbeing, creating young people who are tolerant and accepting of difference (Thomas 1997).However, French and Swain (2009) found when talking to young disabled people about their experiences of mainstream education, many felt embarrassment about being different, having a negative effect on their relationships with other children.These difficulties are further emphasised byWarnock (2005) who expressed concerns about inclusion due to the high levels of bullying and victimisation reported by pupils with SEN compared to their typically developing peers.

 

Objectives

 

The purpose of this study is to examine the social relations, friendship and belonging of children, some of who have BESD. This involves examining how participants are treated by peers (and their attitudes towards this), their sense of belonging, and also why this is the case, investigating the teaching practices and wider school policies which may have been helpful or detrimental in supporting these social experiences. Research in this area is very limited, especially studies which foreground the views of children themselves (Ash et al. 1997), demonstrating the usefulness of this research.

 

My research questions are:

 

1. What are participants’ social experiences and sense of belonging during both formal (lesson time) and informal (breaks and lunchtime) parts of the school day?

 

2. What teaching strategies and wider school practices support or inhibit the positive social experiences and sense of belonging of participants?

 

This study also has a strong methodological focus, in which I investigated the affordances of various methods (such as participatory social mapping and video stimulated recall) in providing insights into participants’ social interactions and belonging. The final research question is:


3. How can the visual be used to illuminate the social experiences and belonging of participants?

Method

In this paper I focus on fieldwork in one primary school in Southern England. Utilising a visual, ethnographic case study approach, I explore the social experiences of 6 children aged 7-11, some with BESD. Methods included me adopting the role of ‘helper’, keeping fieldnotes and a reflexive diary to help me think about the situatedness of the research. Reflecting feminist and disability discourses (Reinharz 1992; Oliver 1990) I was determined to foreground the experiences of the participants. I used a task based visual approach alongside my ‘helper’ role, which involved: Social mapping – To support discussion each participant drew a concept map to show the children they spend time with in school. Walking tour – Each participant took me on a tour of their school, using a video camera to record the children they spend time with. Video stimulated recall - Each participant watched and discussed the video images they had created during their walking tour and also images of themselves taking part in the research. Analysis reflects an on-going, cyclical process, embracing the ambiguous nature of the data. Using Transana video analysis software, all the data (including the visual – such as gesture) were transcribed and coded enabling multimodal analysis.

Expected Outcomes

I anticipate that this research will show: 1.The uniqueness of the children’s social experiences and the aspects of school practice which support or hinder these social experiences for these particular children. These findings may then cautiously be applied more broadly to other children in other schools (both in England and abroad), something Bassey (2001) refers to as a ‘fuzzy generalisation’. 2.The need for stakeholders both in England and further afield to be more aware of the specific nature of peer relations and belonging for children. 3.The affordances of the visual in illuminating the social experiences of children, creating an approach that is more inclusive, enjoyable and motivating than traditional research approaches, such as using a questionnaire. 4.The role of visual methods in supporting the active and competent participation of children (especially those with BESD) in research, challenging traditional deficit understandings of children and SEN.

References

Ainscow, M., Booth, T. & Dyson, A. (1999). Inclusion and exclusion in schools: listening to some hidden voices. In Ballard, K. Inclusive education. International Voices and Disability and Justice. London, Falmer press. 139-151. Ash, A., Bellow, J., Davies, M., Newman, T. & Richardson, L. (1997). Everybody In? The experience of disabled students in further education. Disability & Society, 12, 4, 605-621. Bassey, M. (2001). A Solution to the Problem of Generalisation in Educational Research: fuzzy prediction. Oxford Review of Education, 27, 1, 5-22. Booth, T. & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for Inclusion: Developing Learning and Inclusion in Schools. Bristol, Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education. DfEE. (1997). Excellence for All Children: Meeting Special Educational Needs. London, HMSO. French, S. & Swain, J. (2009). Controlling inclusion in education: young disabled people's perspectives. In Swain, J., French, S., Barnes, C. & Thomas, C. Disabling Barriers - Enabling Environments. London, Routledge. 169-175. Koster, M., Pijl, S.J., Houten, E.V. & Nakken, H. (2007). The social position and development of pupils with SEN in mainstream Dutch primary schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education 22, 1, 31–46. Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York, Harper. Oliver, M. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke, The MacMillan Press Ltd. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. Oxford, Oxford University press. Thomas, G. (1997). Inclusive schools for an inclusive society. British Journal of Special Education, 24, 3, 103-107. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Salamanca, Spain, UN. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. New York, UN. Warnock, M. (2005). Special Educational Needs: A New Look. London, Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.

Author Information

Samantha Child (presenting / submitting)
University of Southampton
Southampton Education School
Southampton

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.