Transition between Primary and Lower Secondary Stage of Basic School from the Students’ and Their Teacher` Perspective
Author(s):
Marketa Holubova (presenting / submitting) Katerina Novotna (presenting) Karel Stary
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES H 09, Transitions and education

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-18
13:15-14:45
Room:
FCEE - Aula 2.9
Chair:
Alison Neilson

Contribution

Our paper deals with students` and teachers` experience of transition between primary and lower secondary school. We are predominantly interested in Czech students at the age of 11 or 12, when they leave the primary stage of the basic school and enter the second lower secondary stage of the basic school. At the end of the primary stage of the basic school Czechs students have two possibilities how to continue in their educational journey. They enter multi-year gymnasium or stay at the basic school and enter the lower secondary stage of the basic school. A number of researches concerning the transition to multi-year gymnasia have been done, but few researchers have been concerned with the transition within the basic school. However, the transition between primary and lower secondary school was identified as complicated point of basic education in the Czech Republic and other European countries with similar educational system. During the transition considerable social changes occur, an arrangement of teaching differs and many students are confronted with first serious failures.

The research topic emerged from the previous research (Dvořák, Starý et al, 2010), which was devoted to the school as an institution, and several questions were raised. We tried to answer the questions in the presented research that was part of a larger research. The research question: ‘How the students and their teachers perceive transition between primary and lower secondary school?’ We did not focus on objective description of different kinds of transition, which were described in Walterová et al (2011) but we were interested in subjective description of students` and teachers` feeling accompanying the transition, and what they see as the most important aspects, which contribute to the smoothest transition. 

The paper tries to discuss whether the arrangement of the teaching is as important as teachers stress it. The support of rebuilding the class collective at the beginning of lower secondary school, providing students with enough information related to the transition and better cooperation between teachers of primary and lower secondary school might be more crucial for the smooth transition. The lack of information and knowledge of their new classmates increase the students` anxiety related to transition more than expectation of worsening their school results and decrease of their free time.

There seems to be also a relationship between the nature of the teacher’s perception and their students` perception of the lower secondary school. The more motivating and positive about lower secondary school teachers are, the more relaxed and positive the students` attitude is.   

 

Method

For the data collection we made interviews with students and theirs teachers from 5th and 6th grade at chosen basic schools from Prague. These two grades separate the 1st and 2nd stage at Czech basic school. We chose a qualitative research approach because it seems to be suitable for the detection of subjective feelings. The content of their responses were analyzed in order to capture the essence of their meaning which summarizes the research question: ‘How the students and their teachers perceive transition between primary and lower secondary school?’ For the data collection we chose the following methods: • In-depth interviews with teachers took approximately 1 hour each • Triads with students took approx. 30 minutes each. Triads are qualitative method of data collection that is essentially a three-person focus group with a moderator. Because there are fewer participants, triads offer an opportunity to hear each participant views in more depth, and is a good way to test more complex materials. All interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the program MAX QDA. We used the method of open coding, which is usually used in the grounded theory.

Expected Outcomes

The description of students` perception of the transition could be differentiated into four categories: anxiety (related mainly to worse school results, bigger demands, more strict teachers etc.), expectation of being older, social changes in the class, and changes in arrangement of teaching and school life in general. On the other hand the main topics in teachers` statements were the preparation of students for the transition in terms of training students to certain style of work and the role of the class teacher during the transition. Another topic, which teachers see as important, is problems related to social changes in class due to leaving of some of the students and enrolling of new students which results in the need of conscious support or even rebuilding the class collective. Surprisingly the students see the transition more positively and less problematic than their teachers. Students consider having enough information about the lower secondary level as one of the most significant aspect enabling smooth transition, while teachers see a good preparation in terms of style of work at the school and learning and gradual rising of demands as the vital element.

References

Dvořák, D. Starý, K., Urbánek, P., Chvál, M., & Walterová, E. (2010). Česká základní škola. Vícepřípadová studie. [Czech basic school. Multicase study.] Praha: Karolinum. Walterová, E. a kol. (2011) Dva světy základní školy? Úskalí přechodu z 1. na 2. stupeň. [Two worlds of a basic school? Difficulties of the transition from the first stage to the second stage. ] Praha: Karolinum. Blackwell, D. & Blackwell, B. (1988). Conducting qualitative research with children. Quirk’s Marketing Research Review. Retrieved from http://www.quirks.com. Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine. Nuthall, G. (2004). Relating Classroom Teaching to Student Learning: A Critical Analysis of Why Research Has Failed to Bridge the Theory-Practice Gap. Harvard Educational Review, 74 (3), 273-306. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd edition) London: Sage Publications. Hendl, J. Kvalitativní výzkum: Základní metody a aplikace. [Qualitative research. Basic methods and applications.] Praha: Portál, 2005. Švaříček, R., Šeďová, K. et al (2007) a kol. Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. [Qualitative research in educational studies.] Praha: Portál.

Author Information

Marketa Holubova (presenting / submitting)
The Faculty of Education, Charles University
The Institue for Research and Development of Education
Prague
Katerina Novotna (presenting)
Faculty of Education, Charles University in Prague
Institute for Reasearch and Development
Prague
Charles University in Prague
Faculty of Education
Praha

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.