School Differentiation, Social Networks, and Anti-School Attitudes
Author(s):
Daniel Alexandrov (presenting / submitting) Valeria Ivaniushina
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

05 SES 04 B, School Disaffection

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-19
09:00-10:30
Room:
ESI 1 - Aula 25
Chair:
Mark Hadfield

Contribution

Our paper is concerned with the school differentiation and the formation and persistence of pro/anti-school attitudes in urban schools, and the role of motivation and pro-school attitudes in school achievement. 

Researchers have long argued that racial/ethnic /class gaps in educational achievement are often due to peer pressure effects and the emergence of particular ‘anti-school culture’ of working class and/or minority students in schools. After seminal studies by Paul Willis of ‘anti-authority’ subculture and John Ogbu of ‘oppositional culture’ the research in this area was polarized into two distinct trends: urban ethnography and quantitative sociology of large-scale surveys. 

We approach this problem from the vantage point of social network analysis which has the advantage of grasping local contextual effects and doing it with statistical rigor. While research on differentiation-polarization was focused on individual and school level (working class vs. middle class, vocational vs. academic track etc.), we look at the emergence and persistence of anti-school culture in students' small crowds (cliques) rather than on school level. We identify cliques in class networks and use them as a level of analysis anti-school attitudes along with individual and schools.

In our research we test the following hypotheses:
H 1. Socio-economic differentiation of schools leads to the rise of anti-school attitudes in small disadvantaged schools (in accordance with differentiation-polarization theory). Smaller schools with lower aggregate SES have higher anti-school attitudes. High level of anti-school attitudes negatively influence GPA controlled by family SES (= school effects).
H 2. Peer pressure effects are stronger in social networks rather than on school or class level, and students form groups within schools based on anti-school attitudes and educational plans. There is homophily on anti-school attitudes. Network effects on anti-school attitudes are stronger than school effects.

Method

Our research is based on large original survey dealing with ethnicity, segregation and social networks in schools in St. Petersburg metropolitan area (104 schools, 419 classes = 419 complete networks, 7300 students). In the survey we elicited full class friendship networks and measured pro/anti-school attitudes, engagement in learning, educational and professional aspirations, parental SES, ethnic and migration status. The survey results are complemented and verified by the qualitative data from the same schools. As statistical techniques for social network analysis we used p2 in StockNET and ERGM in R, and for multi-level analysis we used HLM7 package.

Expected Outcomes

Analysis of friendship choices in classes while controlling for gender, social class, ethnicity and migration background reveals homophily between students on anti-school attitudes and educational plans. Students exhibit homophily on anti-school attitudes without having homophily on educational aspirations and educational plans. There is no strong effect of anti-school culture on the school level, i.e. there are no schools with concentrated anti-school culture in St. Petersburg despite pronounced school differentiation. Effect of shared anti-school attitudes on clique level is much stronger, even after controlling for personal anti-school attitudes. We argue that students form small cliques that share certain level of anti-school culture, and it is on the clique level that anti-school attitudes are shaped and developed. The paper will discuss both network data and qualitative data focusing on the relation between ethnicity, migration background, social class and anti-school attitudes, and the emerging counter-school culture.

References

Ainsworth-Darnell, J.W., Downey, D.B. (1998). Assessing the Oppositional Culture Explanation for Racial/Ethnic Differences in School Performance. American Sociological Review 63: 536-553 Downey, D.B., Ainsworth-Darnell, J.W. (2002) The Search for Oppositional Culture among Black Students. American Sociological Review. Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 156-164 Farkas, G. (2002) Does Oppositional Culture Exist in Minority and Poverty Peer Groups? American Sociological Review, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 148-155 Fryer, R.G., Torelli, P. (2005) An Empirical Analysis of 'Acting White. NBER Working Paper 11334. Lucas, S.R. Stratification Theory, Socioeconomic Background, and Educational Attainment: A Formal Analysis, Rationality and Society November 2009 vol. 21 no. 4 459-511 Stark, T., Flache, A. (2011) The Double Edge of Common Interest: Ethnic Segregation as an Unintended Byproduct of Opinion Homophily. Sociology of Education - firstonline - published on December 19, 2011 as doi:10.1177/0038040711427314

Author Information

Daniel Alexandrov (presenting / submitting)
Higher School of Economics
Sociology
St.Petersburg
Higher School of Economics - St.Peterburg, Russian Federation

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.