Exploring Multiple Conceptions of Financial Literacy
Author(s):
Carmela Aprea (presenting / submitting) Klaus Breuer (presenting)
Peter Davies (presenting)

Eveline Wuttke (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Round Table

Session Information

02 SES 05 B, Round Table: Exploring Multiple Conceptions Of Financial Literacy

Round Table

Time:
2012-09-19
11:00-12:30
Room:
FCT - Aula 22
Chair:
Anna Maria Ajello

Contribution

Given the financial challenges that most European countries are currently facing, financial literacy (i.e. the ability to reasonably deal with financial matters) is becoming an indispensable competence in everyday life. However, citizens of all ages seem not to be very well prepared to effectively cope with these demands, as several international surveys (e.g., INFE, 2009; OECD, 2005; 2009; Reifner, 2006) conveyed. Thus, the promotion of financial literacy remains a core concern for every educational system. This necessity, in turn, presupposes the availability of an educationally sound and agreed upon conception which helps to define the aims and contents of financial literacy education and assessment. However, instead of a concerted action, the current debate resembles a cacophony of diverging personal, institutional and curricular conceptions of financial literacy with many different purposes (e.g. knowledgeable consumers, acceptance of fiscal policy) and interest groups (e.g., politicians, consumer protectors, financial service providers), yet bearing the danger that not sufficiently reflected intentions may enter the classrooms. The roundtable aims to support the clarification of this debate by focusing on the following questions:

  • What conceptions of financial literacy do exist and what specific characteristics do they have?
  • Are these conceptions helpful with respect to educational purposes?
  • How can diverging conceptions be made visible, and thus negotiable and/or reconcilable?

Four short paper presentations are foreseen:

Presentation 1:Financial literacy in the context of democracy (Davies)

This paper contrasts the prevailing individualistic approach of financial literacy measurement and financial education with an educational framework that seeks to equip young people to play an active democratic role and to develop a broader understanding of the financial world. In particular, the framework suggests how important dimensions of financial literacy may be addressed in terms of the individual, the financial industry and government.

 

Presentation 2:Students’ attitudes towards financial issues (Breuer)

Whereas financial literacy is mostly conceptualized as an issue of content knowledge, this paper discusses students’ attitudes towards money as another important factor to influence financial performance. More specifically, the development and validation of an assessment questionnaire will be addressed, and results from the validation study (e.g. item analyses, individual attitude profiles) will be presented.

 

Presentation 3:Curricular conceptions of financial literacy (Wuttke & Aprea)

This paper explores the question of how financial topics are already integrated into existing secondary level school curricula. Since curricula seem to vary to a large extend in and between countries, it specifically stresses the need for systematic curricular analyses. In this respect, the rationale as well as first results from a field trial of a respective analysis tool will be presented.

 

Presentation 4:Alternative approaches for exploring conceptions of financial literacy (Aprea & Wuttke)

Given the many-faceted character of financial literacy conceptions, it is reasonable to assume that their exploration requires multiple methodological approaches. Thus, this paper aims to give a synthetic overview of document analysis, self-assessment questionnaires and knowledge tests as prevailing research instruments. Moreover, two studies will be presented, that used competence-based tests and concept maps as alternative assessment devices.

 

 

Method

As already indicated in the context of paper 4, the topic at hand requires a combination of various methodologies and methods. Paper 1 adopts a qualitative approach. Based on the consideration of criteria for a balanced and justified educational framework, it contains a document analysis of some of the currently available financial literacy texts. Paper 2, instead, follows a quantitative stance by forwarding the development and factor analytical corroboration of a typical self-assessment instrument. Paper 3 seeks to merge the two perspectives by analyzing both, quantitative characteristics (e.g. hours designated to financial topics) as well as qualitative facets (e.g. depth of content coverage) of existing curricula. Finally, paper 4 takes up a meta-perspective in that it discusses and evaluates different instruments with respect to the type of information they generate as well as to their prevalence, feasibility and validation in this field of interest.

Expected Outcomes

Given the recentness and controversy of the topic, our intention is surely not to produce definite answers, but to point out directions for further research. With this consideration in mind, the four contributions will, inter alia, lead to the following outcomes: (a) A rationale for defining financial literacy in relation to diverging (intra- and interindividual) purposes and interests (especially papers 1 and 2). (b) Frameworks and tools for curriculum design (paper 1) and curriculum analysis (paper 3) which articulate different dimensions of financial literacy. (c) A synthesis of possible approaches for empirically exploring divergent conceptions of financial literacy (paper 4). Besides these contribution-related issues, we expect the roundtable to stimulate a European and international discussion especially with respect to the following questions: (1) Whose “voices” should be included in conceptualizing financial literacy for educational purposes and why? (2) Are there interest-group related and even country-specific and/or cultural differences in conceptualizing financial literacy? (3) What should be the role of educational research (and researchers) in conceptualizing financial literacy?

References

INFE (2009): Global message on financial education and the crisis. OECD (2005): Improving financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. OECE (2009): PIAAC Literacy: Financial literacy and consumer protection: overlooked aspects of the crisis. From: http://www.financial-education.org/dataoecd/32/3/43138394.pdf Reifner, U. (2006): Financial literacy in Europe. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

Author Information

Carmela Aprea (presenting / submitting)
Swiss Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training, Switzerland
Research and Development
Lugano
Klaus Breuer (presenting)
JGU Mainz
Law & Economics - Voc & Ec Ed
Mainz
Peter Davies (presenting)
University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
Eveline Wuttke (presenting)
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Germany

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.