Predictors of Educational Performance Gap between Natives and Migrants in 14 Countries
Author(s):
Evgeni Varshaver (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES H 04, Intercultural education

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-18
13:15-14:45
Room:
FCEE - Aula 2.4
Chair:
Patrícia Fidalgo

Contribution

Jaap Dronkers was the first to include countries of origin into analysis of the “immigrant gap” in the large cross-country educational tests (Dronkers and Fleischmann 2010; Levels and Dronkers 2008; Levels, Dronkers and Kraaykamp 2008). By running a set of multilevel models he comes to a conclusion that all three effects play a certain role: though the family effect (background characteristics) has the biggest explanatory power, the effects of origin and destination also matter (Levels and Dronkers 2008:1422). At the same time he leaves the explanation of this finding for the future scrutiny. Michael Minkov (2008) gives an important clue on importance of considering values in attempts to explain the differences on the country level. Building upon a tradition of texts that deals with the notion of long-term orientation values on individual (Heine 2001) and ecological (Hofstede 2001) level and taking the World Values Survey as the data source he creates a monumentalism index. This index is a combination of two conceptual scales: self-enhancement versus self-effacement and self-stability versus self-flexibility (Minkov 2008:183). According to his estimations (Minkov 2008:187), while controlled for the GDP and the PPP, the monumentalism rate is strongly and negatively correlated with TIMSS both math and science results of all years. The proposed research builds upon these two efforts and attempts to answer the basic research questions: Do predictors that lie in the realm of values able to explain variance in the gap between educational results of natives and different groups of migrants? Is the Monumentalism index capable of explaining the gap? Are there other value-predictors applicable for explaining gaps?

Method

The PISA test was selected among other cross-national educational tests due to the fact that it is the only test than contains data on the country of origin. The gaps between natives and existent groups of migrants were selected. The number of countries test countries was 14 and the number of diasporas was 93. The gap was selected as a dependent variable. The set of independent variables consisted of (a) gaps in family characteristics between natives and diasporas, (b) country of test characteristics, (c) gaps in value indices between natives and diasporas, (d) cultural regions of countries of origin (Inglehart and Welzel 2010). The multivariate regression was run, 16 models were estimated.

Expected Outcomes

The biggest explanatory power among four groups of variables has the first group that deals with the characteristics of a family. The difference between PISA built-in index ESCS of a group of natives and a diaspora explains 61.5% of variance. The Gini index adds 2.9% to the explanatory power of the final model. It has been also shown that values play a certain role in predicting school performance of migrant children of different origin. There are combinations of cultural values that, while considering country and family characteristics, can predict school performance of different immigrant groups. The two sets of values that are of the biggest explanatory power are traditional versus secular-rational values (Inglehart) and monumentalism values (Minkov) with the former adding 4.7% and the latter adding 7.9% of explained variance to the final model. Adding a binary variable that describes a diaspora in terms of whether it originates from Confucian or non-Confucian region strengthens the explanatory power of a final model by 11.5% of explained variance. In all observed cases Chinese migrants perform better than natives. At the same time, taken separately Islamic or Ex-Communist origin doesn’t have such effect – neither positive nor negative.

References

Dronkers, J., and F. Fleischmann. 2010. The educational attainment of second generation immigrants from different countries of origin in the EU-member-states. In Quality and inequality of education. cross-national perspectives., ed. J. Dronkers. Dordrecht/London: Springer. Heine, S. J. 2001. Self as cultural product: An examination of east asian and north american selves. Journal of Personality 69 (6): 881-906. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Inglehart, R., and Ch Welzel. 2010. Changing mass priorities: The link between modernization and democracy. Perspectives on Politics 8 (2): 551-67. Levels, M., and J. Dronkers. 2008. Educational performance of native and immigrant children from various countries of origin. Ethnic and Racial Studies 31 : 1404-25. Levels, M., J. Dronkers, and G. Kraaykamp. 2008. Immigrant Children’s educational achievement in western countries: Origin, destination, and community effects on mathematical performance. American Sociological Review 73 : 835-53. Minkov, M. 2008. Self-enhancement and self-stability predict school achievement at the national level. Cross-Cultural Research 42 (2): 172-96.

Author Information

Evgeni Varshaver (presenting / submitting)
National Research University - Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russia)
Sociology of Education and Science Laboratory
Moscow

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.