Social Segregation in Education Within Schools in Turkey
Author(s):
Nacar Demir (presenting / submitting) Zafer Kiraz
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES F15, Inter-cultural issues

Parallel paper session

Time:
2012-09-18
09:00-10:30
Room:
FCEE - S. 3
Chair:
Sabine Krause

Contribution

Before the institutionalization of education, education belonged to a particular person or aristocracy. Institutionalization of education started with industrialization. Depending on the increase at factory production and mass production, labor skills had chanced, new business process had begun. This current state required to gain more knowledge and skills before starting work. Schools were the institutions that meet these needs (Ünal and others, 2005). But the aim of institutionalization of education and increase in schooling was not only to improve the skills of the labor.

At 19th century, schools served as a lever of modernity. The citizen of the modern world could train only at schools that reached a wide audience, so education provided as a public sevice at this period (Sayılan, 2001).

As is clear from these narratives, schools – like every instution – is gaining its meaning and function within the system that it takes part in. Today, schools provide the selection and certification of the labor. Also it stores and transmits the dominant culture, and it defines it as a legitimised knowledge. Thus, it provides the continuity of social inequalities, privileges through the cultural transmission. Schools also takes over the function of teaching all the things ( behaviours, standarts, thinking patterns etc.) that can serve to the ideological hegemony of the dominant groups (Apple, 2006).

Schools performs this function through strict discipline rules; control mechanisms; standard educational programs; boring and authoritarian teaching methods. Another function of schools, which is related to listed above, is reproducing social inequalities, discrimination, exclusion and social segregation by its own mechanisms.

In Turkey, this is seen most clearly in areas that schools built. Today most of the cities have lost their public space character. Opportunities in urban areas are not accessible for everyone. This social segregation and spatial fragmentation cause socio-spatial division at schools (Ünal and others, 2010).  This divison creates schools with different qualities in the same region. Also it deepens ethnic, cultural, religious, gender and class inequalities.

This segregation happens not only between schools, but also within a school. This study will focus on educational experiences at school in Turkey. What kind of segregation dynamics are created by this experiences? To answer this question, basic dynamics of social segregation in Turkey will be examined, which are gender, social class, ethnicity, and religious origin.

Method

In this study, qualitative research approach will adopted and behavioral patterns that occur in school, discipline rules, relationship between student – teacher - administrator will be examined. The purpose of the qualitative research is to reveal a holistic and in–depth look at a research object, and examine, understand it in the context of its complexity (Punch, 2005). Therefore qualitative research approach provides to make an in-depth analysis within the complex relations at schools. The study group of the research will be selected by purposive sampling technique. Ethnic, cultural, religious and social class diversity will be taken into account in order to determine the school. Systematic observation will be done at that selected school. Also in-depth interviews will be made with students and teachers. In-depth interview technique will make it possible to grasp the details and to get the esence of relations, process and fact of the social reality. Interview and observation forms will be created by scanning the relevant literature. After receiving the expert opinion, the application process will start.

Expected Outcomes

Nowadays, many studies in the literature reveals social segregation between schools and within a school, and the reletionship between segregation and social inequalities (Kozol, 2005; Rivkin, 1994; Strtesky and Hogan, 2005; Willms, 1996; Conger, 2004). Educational segregation studies takes place in literature of Turkey more recently. Ünal’s and others (2010) and Kiraz’s (2009) studies shows the dimensions of segregation between and within schools in Turkey. In this study, social segregation in education within schools will tried to examine in the light of gender, social class, ethnicity, and religious origin.

References

• Apple M. (2006), Eğitim ve İktidar, (Çev: Ergin Bulut), Kalkedon Yayınları, İstanbul. • Conger, D. (2004). Understanding Within-School Segregation in New York City Elementary Schools. Unpulished Dissertation. New York University. • Kiraz Z. (2009). Kent İlköğretim Okulları Arasındaki Ayrışmanın Dinamiklerinin Çözümlenmesi: Ankara İli Çankaya İlçesi Örneği. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. • Kozol, J. (2005). The Shame of the Nation: The Restoration of Apartheid Schooling in America. New York: Crown Publishing. • Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to Social Research–Quantitative & Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage. • Rivkin, S. G. (1994). Residential Segregation and School Integrtion. Sociology of Education 67(4), p. 279-293. • Sayılan F. (2001), “Paradigma Değişirken: Küreselleşme ve Yaşamboyu Eğitim”, Cevat Geray’a Armağan, Mülkiyeliler Birliği Yayını, p. 609–624. • Strtesky, P. B., Hogan, M.J. (2005). Segregation and School Disorder. The Social Science Journal, 42, p. 405–420. • Ünal L. I., Tural N., Aksoy H. H., (2005), Mesleki Eğitim ve Yaşam Boyu Eğitim: Ekonomi Politik Bir Değerlendirme, Yaşam Boyu Öğrenme, Pegem A. Yayıncılık, Ankara. • Ünal L. I., Özsoy S., Yıldız A., Güngör S., Aylar E., Çankaya D., (2010), Eğitimde Toplumsal Ayrışma, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara. • Willms, J. D. (1996). School Choice and Community Segregation: Findings From Scotland. In A Kerckhoff (Ed.), Generating Social Stratification: Toward a New Research Agenda. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Author Information

Nacar Demir (presenting / submitting)
Ankara University Faculty of Education Science
Education Management and Policy
Ankara
Gaziosmanpasa University
Departmant of Educational Science
Tokat

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.