Examining the Views of Pre-Service Teachers about Nuclear Power Plants
Author(s):
Sinem Uner (presenting / submitting) Huseyin Akkus
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES C 07, Science Education

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-17
13:30-15:00
Room:
FCEE - Aula 2.7
Chair:
Patrícia Fidalgo

Contribution

Energy is one of the leading conditions of economic activities in all developed or developing countries. The significance of energy and energy requirement is increasing every day. Nuclear energy has emerged to be one of the options to meet the growing energy requirement (Temurcin & Aliagaoglu, 2003). A revival of interest has occurred on nuclear energy since the beginning of the twenty-first century (Whitfield, Rosa, Den & Dietz, 2009).

The future of nuclear energy not only depends on economical and technical factors, but also depends on social acceptability (van der Pligt, van der Linden & Ester, 1982). The acceptability of nuclear energy programs will depend on the reactions of people (Venables, Pidgeon, Simmons, Henwood & Parkhill, 2009). The acceptability of nuclear energy is not just a matter of public risk perception, but also the matter of beliefs and values (van der Pligt, et al., 1982). Public attitudes, values and perceptions on nuclear energy should be understood and the policies about nuclear energy should be adopted by public (Whitfield, et al., 2009). Nuclear energy can cause an extraordinary concern among people (van der Pligt, et al., 1982). To ensure public support for the issue of nuclear energy need to be addressed effectively and reliably (Adamantiades & Kessides, 2009).

The social aspects about the construction of nuclear power plants in Turkey remain very uncertain. The nuclear power plant issue at the technical levels has been discussed, but the social dimension of the issue has been ignored and the social acceptability has not been investigated. Individuals' views should be examined in order to explain the social acceptability of construction of nuclear power plants (Palabıyık, Yavas & Aydın, 2010).

The purpose of this study is tointroduce pre-service teachers’ views about the nuclear power plants and the construction of nuclear power plants in Turkey.

Method

This study was designed as a case study conducted with 233 pre-service teachers at a public university in Turkey in 2010-2011 spring semesters. The 13 of the participants were pre-service chemistry teachers, 52 of them pre-service primary science teachers and 168 of them were pre-service primary mathematics teachers. 12 pre-service teachers stated that they had no idea about nuclear power plants. Because of this reason these pre-service teachers were excluded from this study and the other 221 pre-service teachers’ views were analyzed. The sample was formed with the convenience sampling method. The participants were asked to write their views about nuclear power plants and the construction of nuclear power plant in Turkey. In this study, content analysis was used to analyze the views of the participants. Content analysis is a useful method to determine the interests of individuals and groups (Stemler, 2001). In this study, written data was categorized and the categories were counted. Also written data obtained from the participants were analyzed interpretively. The participants’ views were analyzed by each researcher independently. Consistency for the evaluation of categories was 90% agreement among the researchers. The researchers resolved all disagreements by discussion until 100% agreement was reached.

Expected Outcomes

The results of this study indicated that participants were divided into two groups who supported the construction of nuclear power plants and who objected to the construction of nuclear power plants. The participants who supported the construction of nuclear power plants stated that the nuclear power plants were the best way to deal with global warming and would contribute to the national economy. Some of the participants thought that the nuclear power plants could provide cheaper and more efficient energy than the other energy sources. Some of the participants stated that they could conduct a campaign to construct the nuclear power plants. The participants who objected to the nuclear power plants stated that they objected to the construction of nuclear power plants because of the accident risk. Some of the participants stated that they could conduct a campaign to prevent the construction of nuclear power plants. Also some of them thought that the nuclear power plants could reduce the biological diversity and nuclear waste could not store safely.

References

Adamantiades, A. & Kessides, I. (2009). Nuclear power for sustainable development: current status and future prospects. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5149-5166. Palabıyık, H., Yavas, H. & Aydın, M. (2010). Türkiye’de nükleer santral kurulabilir mi? çatışmadan uzlaşıya: türkiye’de nükleer enerji projelerinde sosyal kabul sorunu ve halkın reddetme sendromunun araştırılması. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 5(2), 175-201. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17). Temurcin, K. & Aliagaoglu, A. (2003). Nükleer enerji ve tartışmalar ışığında türkiye’de nükleer enerji gerçeği. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 1 (2), 25-39. van der Pligt, J., van der Linden, J. & Ester, P. (1982). Attitudes to nuclear energy: beliefs, values and false consensus. Journal of Enviromental Psychology, 2, 221-231. Venables, D., Pidgeon, N., Simmons, P., Henwood, K. & Parkhill, K. (2009). Living with nuclear power: a q-method study of local community perceptions. Risk analysis, 8, 1089-1104. Whitfield, S.C., Rosa, E.A., Den, A. & Dietz, T. (2009). The future of nuclear power: value orientations and perceptions. Risk analysis, 3, 425-437.

Author Information

Sinem Uner (presenting / submitting)
Gazi University
Secondary Science and Mathematics Education
Ankara
Gazi University, Turkey

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.