What Do Skills Demonstrations Reveal? The Reliabilitys and Confidence in the Assessment Process of Skills demonstrations in upper secondary VET
Author(s):
Mari Räkköläinen (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

02 SES 07 B, Assesment Of Competences: Analyses Of Diverse Practices

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-19
17:15-18:45
Room:
FCT - Aula 22
Chair:
Andreas Saniter

Contribution

What Do Skills Demonstrations reveal? The Reliability and confidence in the assessment process of Skills Demonstrations in VET

Student assessments for upper secondary vocational qualifications have been reformed such that vocational competence is assessed based on skills demonstrations. Skills demonstrations enable students to demonstrate their competence either at the workplace or in other surroundings that provide an accurate representation of the functional modules relevant to their occupational proficiency. Skills demonstrations in upper secondary vocational qualifications are known as vocational skills demonstrations. In addition to student assessments, national evaluation of learning outcomes in vocational education and training were also reformed to become skills demonstrations-based. As a result, assessment information for national evaluations will be obtained directly from skills demonstrations and separate national tests are no longer needed. However, coordination of student assessments and national evaluations involves tensions between the different aspects of assessment.

The purpose of this study was to provide information on use of assessments to develop the assessment and evaluation system further based on skills demonstrations, to increase theoretical understanding of assessing vocational competence based on vocational skills demonstrations and to observe tensions present in assessments, reliability of assessments and confidence in the assessment process. In addition, this study strives to provide relevant information to facilitate drawing practical conclusions in the process of developing the assessment system based on skills demonstrations. The conceptual framework is based on theories on assessment and assessment concepts involving, in particular, different assessment and evaluation traditions, different functions of assessments and evaluation and criteria or quality requirements set for assessment information. In addition, the relationship between assessment and learning is observed. The research questions posed were as follows: In what way are control and confidence present in the process of assessing occupational proficiency on the basis of vocational skills demonstrations? What kind of assessment information do assessments of vocational competence provide in different contexts, in particular, student assessments, the assessment practises of educational institutions and system-level evaluation? How is reliability of assessment information ensured and how is confidence in the new system of assessing vocational competence on the basis of skills demonstrations promoted?

Skills demonstrations have many functions and purposes in political decision-making and national guidance, but in the finalised system, the function of skills demonstrations is yet to be specified in detail and the objectives of skills demonstrations tend to include both formative and summative assessment targets in parallel. Regulations concerning skills demonstrations involve balancing between tensions: there is ambivalence between control and trust in all contexts of quality assurance of assessments based on skills demonstrations – quality assurance is both rigid and flexible and there are dissonances between different quality requirements. Assessments based on skills demonstrations are considered to be an accurate and usable method of student assessment, because skills demonstrations are authentic situations and assessment is based on set criteria Vocational skills demonstrations increase the accuracy and validity of assessment results, but reliability is an issue in national evaluation of learning outcomes.

 

Method

The approach is understanding and interpretative in a phenomenological-hermeneutic framework. The research material – official records and memoranda, pilot project results, participants’ experiences and external evaluation and feedback for the project – were gathered from national development work carried out between 1999 and 2008. The materials were classified into different contexts in line with the subject of the study, that is, an assessment process based on skills demonstrations. Analysis of the material was based on a conceptual model of tensions between the formative and summative, internal and external and confidence and control aspects of assessments applying holistic hermeneutic interpretation with first-order and second-order observations leading to the main findings.

Expected Outcomes

In conclusion: positive effects of assessment based on skills demonstrations, such as participation and learning experiences, increase confidence in the new assessment system. Quality assurance and confidence are linked in a positive way: the same factors that promote the quality of skills demonstrations and reliability of learning outcomes also increase confidence in assessments. These factors include collaborative assessment, target and criteria-based assessment, useful feedback, participation and peer assessment in quality assurance of skills demonstrations. Assessments based on skills demonstrations also increase confidence in the quality of student assessments. However, it is not possible to distinguish when assessments rely on confidence and when they promote confidence. Quality assurance will develop assessment of students’ skills demonstrations and increase confidence in assessment results. Excessive regulation can lead to a reduction in the accuracy of skills demonstrations and thus decrease confidence in assessments. Confidence in assessments based on skills demonstrations could be boosted by increasing provision of training for assessors, clarifying assessment criteria as well as providing more material for comparison and background information to support interpretation of national learning outcomes. Participatory quality assurance methods increase confidence in skills demonstrations. In national evaluation, confidence in skills demonstrations is undermined by uncertainty of their purpose and significance.

References

Crooks, T.J. 2002. Educational Assessment in New Zealand Schools. Profiles of Educational Assessment Systems World-Wide. Assessment in Education 9 (2), 237–253. Fetterman, D. 2001. Foundations of Empowerment Evaluation. London: Sage Publications. Guba, G.E. & Lincoln, Y.S. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. O´Neil O. 2002. A Question of Trust. The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Patton, M.Q. 1997. Utilization – Focused Evaluation: The new Century Text. 3.painos. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Pawson, R. & Tilley, T. 1997a. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage Publication. Räkköläinen, M. 2011. What do skills demonstrations reveal? The realibility and confidence in assessment process of skills demonstrations in upper secondary vocational gualifications. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1636. Tampere University Press. Saunders, M. 2006a. Do we Hear the Voices? The “Presence“ of Evaluation Theory and Practice in Social Development. Evaluation. The Internation Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 12 (2), 251–264. Stobart, G. 2008. Testing Times. The uses and abuses of assessment. Lontoo: Routledge. Stame, N. 2004a. Theory-based Evaluation and Types of Complexity. Evaluation. The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 10 (1), 58–76.

Author Information

Mari Räkköläinen (presenting / submitting)
Finnish National Board of Education
Professional Development of Educational Personnel
Helsinki

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.