Views of Emerging Researchers on Educational Research Process
Author(s):
Sezen Apaydin (presenting / submitting) Halime Ozturk
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES C 04, Research Processes

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-17
13:30-15:00
Room:
FCEE - Aula 2.4
Chair:
Fiona Hallett

Contribution

According to Mortimore (2000), educational research has four tasks: to observe and record systematically, to analyze and draw out implications, to publish findings, and to improve educational processes and outcomes. To publish the results of an investigation is one of the most important parts of research process. Ray (2006) emphasized that the aim of scientific investigation was publication and he noted the following statement: "If a tree falls in the forest and there is no one there to hear it fall, does it make sound? The correct answer is no. Sound is more than, 'pressure waves' and indeed there can be no sound without a hearer. And similarly, scientific communication is a two-way process. Just as a signal of any kind is useless unless it is both received and understood by its intended audience." As can be understood from Ray's expression, educational research like the others is done to be released for related people.
Educational researchers have queried themselves about what do they do, who read their articles, who use researches' results, etc. While some researchers emphasize that educational research's potential to guide the practice which consists of teachers, school leaders and policy makers (Mortimore, 2000; Hargreaves, 1997; Hemsley-Brown & Sharp, 2003), the others suggest that educational researches cannot be educative always but informative (Hammersley, 2003). Eventually, educational researchers are still discussing on aims, nature, understanding and methods of educational research (Vanderlinde and Braak, 2010).
There are numerous investigations which aimed to determine teachers' (Shkedi, 1998) and school leaders' (Vanderlinde and Braak, 2010) opinions on educational research.  However, the researches which publicly uncover what educational researchers think about this are limited. In this context, it is aimed to reveal views of emerging researchers who form the future of educational researchers' community on educational research process.  For this purpose, the following research questions are addressed:
1.    According to emerging researchers, what is educational research?
a.    What does it include?
2.    According to emerging researchers, for what is educational research published?
a.    Who should benefit from?
3.    According to emerging researchers, how can be educational research become more useful?

Method

The research method is qualitative due to the nature of qualitative research such as naturalistic setting, design to explore, interpret and understand social contexts collecting data by interactive researchers and in-depth analysis (Lodica, Spaulding&Voegtle, 2006: 264). Participants are composed of the research assistants studying in the Faculty of Education at Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University(COMU). As the researcher is actual source of data and long-term studies are requested during qualitative research process (Bogdan&Biklen, 1998: 4-7), we use advantage of becoming colleagues and have chance to observe other researchers and share experiences which strengthen the validity and reliability of the data. We followed convenient sampling. Even there are about 25 research assistants; we used both focus-groups and individual interviews for data collection. Besides individual interviews, we aim to use the advantage of focus groups due to in-depth and rich data by means of group dynamism and creativity (Krueger&Casey, 2000). Firstly, a focus-group interview has been made in order to clarify the research questions and experience interview skills. Having completed the transcriptions, data were analyzed by content analysis. After that, 2 focus group interviews have been made. We continue to transcribe them. Besides focus groups, we will 6-7 individual interviews will be made.

Expected Outcomes

At the end of the study, data related to how research assistants define educational research, utility of these researches and how they can become better will be provided in order to present the existing situation. We will have chance to compare the results with the literature about this issue. Regarding to the utility of educational researches, emerging researchers discussed about the difference between the qualifications and outcomes of publications by educational and medical researchers. Similarly, one of the researchers studying in special education area told that a teacher can apply the method for similar evidence in his/her classroom By means of this study, it is also thought that it might be an important step in order to present the cultural side for educational researches in Turkiye, to make evaluation from point of view of European educational researches and following the discussions to provide improvement at least at COMU. In addition, suggestions for better educational researches by emerging researches offered ones oriented to teacher training (including curriculum, research methods & access to resources), applications for teachers such as in-service education and more effective university-school relationship. The quality of in-service training has been discussed as well.

References

Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research education: an introduction to theory and methods. Allyn & Bacon: America Online. Hargreaves. (1997). In defence of research for evidence-based teaching: a rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley. British Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 405-419. Hammersley, M. (2003). Can and should educational research be educative? Oxford Review of Education, 29, 3-25. Hemsley-Brown, J. & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to improve professional practice: a systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education, 29, 449-470. Lange, Jeffrey K. (2002). Review: Richard A. Krueger & Mary Anne Casey (2000). Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd Edition) [10 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(4), Art. 28, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0204280. Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2006). Methods in educational research: from theory to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass A Wiley Imprint. Mortimore, P. (2000). Does educational research matter? British Educational Research Journal, 26(1), 5-24. Ray, R. A. (2006). How to write and publish a scientific paper (5th edition). Oryx Press. Shkedi, A. (1998). Teachers’ attitudes towards research: a challenge for qualitative researchers. Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(4), 559-577. Vanderlinde; R. &Van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal. 36 (2). 299-316.

Author Information

Sezen Apaydin (presenting / submitting)
Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
Secondary Science and Mathematics Education
Canakkale
Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
Educational Sciences
Canakkale

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.