Mediation of teachers’ learning through talk within a professional learning community: a case study in Cyprus
Author(s):
Christina Chinas (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES H 15, Didactics

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-18
13:15-14:45
Room:
FCEE - S. 3
Chair:
Theo Wubbels

Contribution

Objectives or purposes

The overarching aim of this doctoral research is to address our limited understanding and try to make sense of the mediation of Cypriot teachers learning through talk within a professional learning community. I consider the interactive processes through which teachers collaboratively develop and construct new and critical insights into their classroom practices as a basis for changing those practices. Yet there appears to be an absence of research that identifies and conceptualises different kinds of teacher talk in collaborative teacher learning groups. Thus there is an interest in describing different kinds of talk especially the ones that are useful for collaborative learning as well describing the different types of knowledge that are developed during joint work.

 

Perspective(s) or theoretical framework

Vygotsky's theory suggests that learning is best achieved through processes of social interaction (Mercer, 2000). From this view of situated learning comes a central focus on collaboration and problem solving. Hargreaves (1999, 2001) notes the importance of reflection, dialogue and inquiry. Most of these are well-founded elements of effective professional development (McCormick et al, 2008; Cordingley et al, 2005a, b). Few accounts of research investigate the processes by which new classroom practices are created and there is an absence of research that identifies different kinds of teacher talk in collaborative teacher learning groups. Thus there is an interest in describing the kinds of talk especially the ones that are useful for collaborative learning as well describing the types of knowledge that are developed during joint work.

 

Research question (maybe including hypothesis/hypotheses)

It is proposed to examine the following research questions:

  1. What are the conditions and processes of collaboration through which Cypriot teachers learn in collaborative settings?

 

  1. What kinds of talk characterise Cypriot teachers’ collaboration within a professional learning community and what kinds of talk are useful for supporting teachers’ collaborative learning?

 

  1. In what ways are different types of knowledge developed and exchanged within a group of teachers?

 

  1. How does teachers’ collaborative learning influence pupils’ and teachers’ classroom practices?

Method

I used a mixed-method multiple case study approach and discourse analysis strategies. The different methods are: lesson study planning meetings (observations, post-meeting teachers’ interviews and diaries); classroom lesson observations, teacher’s and pupils’ interviews; and lesson study evaluation meetings (observations, post-meeting teachers’ interviews and diaries). Before leaving fieldwork general interviews were conducted with the teachers. This research design involved an exploration of the lesson study processes involving five different lesson study groups. I selected the lesson study approach to gain access to the interactive processes through which teachers develop new and critical insights into their classroom practices as a basis for changing those practices. In this way I was able to identify and conceptualize different kinds of teachers’ talk in collaborative teacher learning groups. All five lesson study groups consist of three primary school teachers teaching children of similar age. Teachers produced lesson plans and notes from the lesson study meetings. Also, pupils’ work during the classroom lesson was collected to support data analysis and I was keeping a research journal which is important for qualitative research (Burgess, 1985; Lincoln & Cuba, 1985).

Expected Outcomes

It appears to be an absence of research that identifies and conceptualises different kinds of teacher talk in collaborative teacher learning groups. With this research four kinds of talk were identified. These kinds of talk encouraged the development of different types of knowledge which was classroom based and pupil centred. Evidence suggests that the learning that teachers did together with the use of different kinds of talk, with a strong basis in classroom practice, and with a clear orientation to experimentation and inquiry was particularly effective as a foundation for changing classroom practice. This study illuminated problems teachers face and ways to resolve them with the use of teachers’ classroom based knowledge within their school reality. In addition there is a description of how effective collaboration can be more reliably achieved and describe how effective teaching classroom based practices can arise. Teachers do this inter-thinking in ways which most of us take for granted but which are at the heart of human achievement. Developing a better understanding on how teachers can reach it and use it to combine their intellectual resources has useful and practical outcomes for education.

References

Alexander, R. (2006). Education as Dialogue: Moral and Pedagogical Choices for a Runaway World. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education. Black, P. (2002). Working Inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom. London: King's College. Burgess, R. (1985). Issues in Educational Research: Lewes: Falmer Press. Cordingley, P. et al [CPD Review Group] (2005a). The Impact of Callaborative CPD on Classroom Teaching and Learning. Review: What Do Teahcers Impact Data Tell Us about Collaborative CPD?, London:EPPI-Centre Cordingley, P. et al [CPD Review Group] (2005b). The Impact of Callaborative Continuying Professional Developemnt (CPD) on Classroom Teaching and Learning. Review: How Do Collaborative and Sustained CPD and Sustained but Not Collaborative CPD Affect Teaching and Learning?, London:EPPI-Centre Hargreaves, D.H. (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47 (2), 122-144. Hargreaves, D.H. (2001). A capital theory of school effectiveness and improvement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 27 (4), 487-503. James, M., Carmichael, P., Frost, D., MacBeath, J. E. C., Pedder, D., Proctor, R., et al. (2006). Learning How to Learn: Tools for Schools. London: Routledge. Lincoln, Y., & Cuba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. New York: Sage. McCormick, R., Banks, F., Morgan, B., Opfer, D., Pedder, D., Storey, A., et al. (2008). Schools and continuing professional development (CPD) in England – State of the Nation research project: Training and Development Agency for Schools. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge. Rudduck, J., & McIntyre, D. (2007). Improving leanring through consulting pupils. London and New York: Routledge. McGuinness, C. (1999). From thinking skills to thinking classrooms : a review and evaluation of approaches for developing pupils' thinking: Annesley, Nottingham : DfES Publications.

Author Information

Christina Chinas (presenting / submitting)
University of Cambridge
Cambridge

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.