Session Information
ERG SES C 07, Education Policies
Paper Session
Contribution
Topic:
The problematic of education policy reform is the theme of this paper.
Research Question:
The paper questions education system reform from within the Australian State of Victoria, and elsewhere, Europe and the UK and argues that contemporary reform efforts take aim at classroom teachers, their instruction and their pre-service preparation. The paper draws on critical theory and the theoretical resources of Foucault to argue that present reform efforts comprise exacting and specific declarations of operation that ignore and deny context. Furthermore, reform efforts rope in for transformation other stakeholders, in the main academic faculties of teacher education. Implicit in the reform effort is not surprisingly decentralization, and importantly an explicit outline of penalty chiefly reserved for ‘underperforming’ classroom teachers and courses of teacher preparation deemed ineffective. The central argument of the paper is that policy portrayals and declarations of fragile and unproductive education system performance originate from an economic reform agenda that slates the contemporary teaching profession including teacher preparation programs.
Theoretical Framework:
A research method informed by critical theory is used. The paper draws on Foucault by framing the analysis on “governmentalization” (Foucault, 1997, p. 28) to critique the “normalizing power” (Mayo, 2000, p. 104) of contemporary education policy, specifically the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD) discussion paper New directions for school leadership and the teaching profession (2012), hereafter referred to as the DEECD Discussion Paper.
The representational focal point of education system modification through transformation hinges on a “regime of truth” (Foucault, 2008, p. 19) the objective of which reflects imposed “techniques of governmentality” (Foucault, 2011c, p. 8). International markers of indicative comparison are central policy constituents of quality. The “reifying abstractions” (Bourdieu & Passeron, 2000, p. 102) used to justify change and reform fails to grasp let alone can deal with the collection of constrictions — mainly economic — experienced by public school systems across Europe, the UK and Australia. Outcomes of schooling typically defined and specified emblematically as statistical symbolic pictographs conceal the “façade of calculation” (Ball, 2006, p. 153) that distracts attention from subjugating policy-making constrictions of economic and political power.
The paper is in three parts. Part one expands on the proposed reforms, and integrates aspects of Foucauldian critical analysis to stress exclusive and international reform focal points of action. Part two deals with the policy emphasis of authentic and valid evaluations of performance that specifically utilize comparative indicators. Part three recognizes that classroom teachers have agency and so a counteracting critique is proposed to the current articulations of reform predicated on forms of resistance that refute system imposed modifications of conduct. The paper concludes by extending the proposed counter critique outlined in part three. In thinking differently about education policy reform, the paper mentions the importance of creativity in teaching practice as a basis for a theory of teaching.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Ball, S. (2006). Education Policy and Social Class. The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London and New York: Routledge. Bourdieu, Pierre. & Passeron, Jean-Claude. (2000). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage Publications. Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in Schools. Tensions and Dilemmas. London and New York: Routledge. Deleuze, G. (1999). Foucault. London: Continuum. Foucault, M. (1989). Madness and Civilization. A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Routledge: London and New York. Foucault, M. (1992). The Use of Pleasure. The History of Sexuality: 2. Great Britain: Penguin. Foucault, M. (1997). The Politics of Truth. New York: Semiotext(e). Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Bio-Politics. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan. Foucault, M. (2011a). Security, Territory, Population. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan. Foucault, M. (2011b). The Government of Self and Others. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan. Foucault, M. (2011c). The Courage of Truth. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan. Moore, A., Edwards, G., Halpin, D., & George, R. (2002) Compliance, Resistance and Pragmatism: The (re)construction of schoolteacher identities in a period of intensive educational reform, British Educational Research Journal, 28:4, 551-565. Wrigley,T., Lingard, B., & Thomson, P. (2012): Pedagogies of transformation: keeping hope alive in troubled times, Critical Studies in Education, 53:1, 95-108. Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. New directions for school leadership and the teaching profession. Discussion paper. Communications Division: Melbourne.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.