"The effectiveness of an anti-bullying intervention program in Greek secondary schools"

Session Information

05 SES 03, (Preventing) Bullying and Violence

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-10
17:15-18:45
Room:
D-313
Chair:
Ruth Leitch

Contribution

                Bullying is recognized among the most serious problems in schools, impairing children’s  emotional wellbeing and learning (Andreou,  Vlachou,  & Didaskalou, 2007. VanDeur, 2011). Recent studies in Greece suggest that involvement in bullying is an issue in school students, affecting  one out of three children in the country (Giavazolias, et al., 2010). There is evidence that children who do not cope well with bullying and who respond in counter-productive ways, may actually reinforce further victimisation (Kochenderfer-Ladd & Skinner, 2002. Skrzypiec et al., 2011).

    In the literature the potential advantages of working through schools as sites for interventions are highlighted (Slee et al., 2009). The ‘coping with bullying’ (CWB) intervention is a program devised by Slee and Murray-Harvey (2006) based on the suggestion that young people could be taught how to cope with stressful situations. The intervention adopts a systemic model of reducing bullying as it is implemented within a whole-school approach to the problem, particularly by encouraging students’ active involvement in working with coping strategies. Central to the intervention is a DVD written and performed by high school students .The programme also includes: Teacher Lesson Plans and lesson materials, Teacher Timetable, Teacher Training Powerpoint, Teacher feedback sheets, and the Student Workbook with the message: Stay Calm. ThinkClearly.

    The original program proved to be effective, as those who reported being seriously bullied pre-intervention were more likely to report less serious bullying post-intervention (effect size: r=.14).

    In order to adjust the intervention program to the Greek reality, an –emic approach had to be followed (Skrzypiec, Roussi-Vergou, & Andreou, 2011). The purpose of our presentation is to a) describe the steps taken to the development of the Greek version of the originally Australian intervention material, b) to present the evaluation from the pilot study, and c) to present the initial outcomes from the final study.

Method

In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the program we conducted two studies: in the pilot study, 130 students, aged 12-13, completed questionnaires before, immediately after and 3 months after the intervention. In the main study, 500 students participated. Their answers were compared to the similar participants’ answers in the control group (N=300), who received no intervention. Measures: we collected data on the frequency and instances of bullying experiences and coping strategies used by young people to deal with it. The same questionnaires were used in the pilot and the main study with the only exception that in the latter the majority of the students completed them online.

Expected Outcomes

The pilot study showed that the intervention successfully reduced the incidence of bullying amongst the seriously bullied students, (with an effect size η2 = 0.65). As the data collection of the main study is still under process, we expected that the seriously bullied children will benefit only in the intervention groups. In that case, the evaluation of the program will be considered completed, and the program will be offered to open access to schools of Greece, suitable for use in the secondary education.

References

Andreou, E., Vlachou, A. & Didaskalou, E. (2007). Emerging Aspects in Understanding Bullying in Schools: Implications for Research and Intervention. In E. M. Vargios (Ed.), Educational Psychology Research Focus, pp. 185-189. New York: Nova Science Publishers. Giavazolias, T., Kourkoutas, E., Mitsopoulou, E., & Georgiadi, M. (2010). The relationship between perceived school climate and the prevalence of bullying behaviour in Greek schools: Implications for preventive inclusive strategies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2208-2215. Kochenderfer-Ladd, B, & Skinner, K. (2002). Children’s coping strategies: Moderators of the effects of peer victimization? Developmental Psychology, 38, 267-278. Skrzypiec, G., Roussi-Vergou, C., & Andreou, E. (2011). Common problems, common solutions? Applying a foreign ‘coping with bullying’ intervention in Greek schools. In R. Shute (Ed.), P. Slee & K. Dix (Assoc. Eds), International perspectives on mental health and wellbeing in education (pp.263-274). AU: Shannon Research Press Skrzypiec, G.K., Slee, P., Murray-Harvey, R., & Pereira, B. (2011). School bullying by one or more ways: does it matter and how do students cope? School Psychology International, 32(3), 288-311. Slee, P.T., & Murray-Harvey, R. (2006). Coping with School Bullying: A video documentation. Paper presented at the 19th Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development, July 2-6, Melbourne, Australia. Slee, P.T., & Murray-Harvey, R. (2011). School bullying: a matter of mental health and wellbeing. In R. Shute (Ed.), P. Slee & K. Dix (Assoc. Eds), International perspectives on mental health and wellbeing in education (pp.79-90). AU: Shannon Research Press Slee, P.T., Skrzypiec, G.K., & Murray-Harvey, R. (2009).The Coping with Bullying Intervention. Paper presented at the ISSBD, Zambia. VanDeur, P. (2011). Seeking students’ perspectives on their social and emotional wellbeing. In R. Shute (Ed.), P. Slee & K. Dix (Assoc. Eds), International perspectives on mental health and wellbeing in education (pp.63-76). AU: Shannon Research Press

Author Information

Eleni Didaskalou (presenting / submitting)
Department of Special Education, University of Thessaly, Greece
University of Thessaly
VOLOS
Secondary Education Bureau of Magnesia, Greece
Department of Special Education, University of Thessaly, Greece

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.