Social class and student’s retention in the Greek University
Author(s):
Eleni Sianou-Kyrgiou (submitting) Iakovos Tsiplakides (presenting)
Olga Tzafea (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 11 B, Inclusion and Diversity in Higher Education Settings

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-12
17:15-18:45
Room:
STD-302
Chair:
Pauline Taylor

Contribution

Over the last few decades, policies in many European Union members states promote the expansion of higher education. This has led to the widening participation in order to develop the 21st century knowledge society.  Despite  that, in a short time, the issue of student retention or non completion has been raised (Tinto,1993). Retention or non completion is a growing concern and has prompted increasing research.

A growing body of literature shows that a large amount of  students entering higher education fail to realize their dreams and aspirations. In this context, a growing number of research examines the reasons for student retention and its impact on students and higher education institutions. Some of the major reasons are academic preparedness, campus climate, commitment to educational goals, institutional habitus, academic integration and financial aidand social class (Taylor &  Bedford 2004, Thomas, 2002). Student retention is a serious problem that leads to the reproduction of inequalities in higher education, despite the widening of participation that aimed at promoting equality. Student retention, or non completion is linked to social inequalities in higher education, as there is a clear relationship between social background and achievement due to differential levels of economic, cultural, and social capital (Bourdieu & Passeron, 1977). Students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are more prone to poor educational outcomes and drop out of university (Thomas & Yorke, 2003).

Despite the growing importance of mass retention, there is a poor body of research in Greece,   at a time when according to official statistics a great number of students do not their studies in higher education.

The aim of that research is to find out the importance of academic integration with regard to student retention and the fact that students have a difficult time completing their studies. We made an attempt to answer on two basic questions. Firstly, we tried to investigate the reasons why students drop out and secondly, the interaction between students’ socioeconomic background and retention. This proposal takes into account the findings of the relevant literature, as well as the trends of current European Union policy about the creation of a common space of European higher education. 

Method

The sample includes students from the University of Ioannina, who have attended university, without completing their studies so far in the official designated time. We focused on students who have not completed their undergraduate studies after two and more years than the official time required. The University of Ioannina is located in Ioannina, a city of about 100,000 inhabitants in north-western Greece. It includes 17 academic departments which altogether number about 20,000 undergraduate and postgraduate students. Both quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection were used. A self completed questionnaire was administered to first-year students (n =750), and 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted (Cohen and Manion 1994).

Expected Outcomes

Findings In answer to the first research question, findings show that the following parameters lead to retention: (a) the system of higher education entry, (b) health problems, (c) the programs of studies in university departments (e.g. workload, teaching/learning method), (d) the effects of the economic crisis, and (e) social factors. As regards the second research question, data provide strong evidence that there is a close relationship between students’ socioeconomic background and retention rates. Discussion Findings show that the effects of each factor on graduation rates are statistically important. Mostly, the differential levels of students’ financial, cultural and social capital have an impact on their trajectories within university as regards their achievement, success, experiences from their studies, and most importantly, degree completion (Sianou-Kyrgiou & Tsiplakides, 2011). Consequently, we strongly recommend that higher education policies at national and European level need to focus on supporting students from less privileged backgrounds through special programming and activities so that they can complete their studies and have the benefits of a university degree in relation to future occupational outcomes. Finally, innovative is rigorous analysis of institutional practice that may improve college persistence and completion rates and may unlock the innovative potential of young.

References

Bourdieu, P., and Passeron, J. C. (1979). The Inheritors: French students and their relation to culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction, in J. Karabel and A. H. Halsey(eds) Power and Ideology in Education. New York: Oxford University Press, 487-511. Bowen, E., Price, T., Lloyd, S. & Thomas, S. (2005). Improving the Quantity and Quality of Attedance Data to Enhance Student Retention. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 29:4, 375-385. Cohen, L. and Manion, L. (1994). Research Methods in Education (4th edition). London: Routledge. McCausland, W. D., Mavromaras, K. & Theodossiou, I. (2005) Explaining Student Retention: The case of the University of Aberdeen Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 7,3, 24-26 Smith, J. P., & Naylor, R. A. (2001). “Dropping out of university: a statistical analysis of the probability of withdrawal for UK university students”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, Vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 389 - 405. Sianou-Kyrgiou, E. (2010). Stratification in higher education, choice and social inequalities in Greece. Higher Education Quarterly, 63:4, 22-40. Sianou-Kyrgiou, E. & I. Tsiplakides (2011). Similar performance, but different choices: social class and access to higher education in Greece. Studies in Higher Education, 36:1,89-102. Taylor A. J. & T. Bedford. (2004). Staff perceptions of factors related to non completion in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 29:3, 375-394 Thomas, L. (2002). Student retention in higher education: the role of institutional habitus. Journal of Education Policy, 17:4, 423-442 Thomas, L & Yorke, M. (2003). Improving the retention of students from lower socio-economic groups. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25:1. 63-75 Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. (2nd Edition). University of Chicago Press.

Author Information

Eleni Sianou-Kyrgiou (submitting)
University of Ioannina, Greece
Iakovos Tsiplakides (presenting)
University of Ioannina, Greece
Olga Tzafea (presenting)
University of ioannina
School of Philosophy
Ioannina

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.