Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002). Does External Accountability Affect Student Outcomes? A Cross-State Analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305–331 Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective Sensemaking about Reading: How Teachers Mediate Reading Policy in Their Professional Communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170 Darling Hammond, L. (1994). National Standards and Assessments: Will They Improve Education? American Journal of Education, 102(4), 478–510 Darling Hammond, L. (2004). Standards, Accountability, and School Reform. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1047–1085 Darling Hammond, L., & Ball, D. Loewenberg. (1994). Teaching for High Standards: What Policymakers Need To Know and Be Able To Do. CPRE Joint Report Series. American Journal of Education, 102(4), 478–510 Darling Hammond, L., & Wise, A. E. (1985). Beyond Standardization: State Standards and School Improvement. Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 315–336 Denzin, N. K. (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory. San Diego: Academic Press. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160 Dingwall, R., & Lewis, P. (Eds.) (1983). The Sociology of the Professions: Laywers, Doctors, and Others. New York: St. Martin's Press. Douglas Orton, J., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223 Fidler, B. (2001). A Structural Critique of School Effectiveness and School Improvement. In A. Harris & B. Nigel (Eds.), School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Alternative Perspectives. New York/London: Continuum. 47-74 Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Goldstein, H. (2001). Using Pupil Performance Data for Judging Schools and Teachers: Scope and Limitations. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 433–442 Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., & Klein, S. P. (Eds.) (2002). Making sense of test-based accountability in education. Santa Monica, CA: Rand. Hanushek, E.A., & Raymond, M.E. (2004). The Effect of School Accountability Systems on the Level and Distribution of Student Achievement. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2-3), 406-415 Harris, S. G. (1994). Organizational Culture and Individual Sensemaking: A Schema-Based Perspective. Organization Science, 5(3), 309–321 Helmke, A. (2004). Von der Evaluation zur Innovation. Pädagogische Nutzbarmachung von Vergleichsarbeiten in der Grundschule. Das Seminar, 2, 90-112 Ingram, D., Louis, K. Seashore, & Schroeder, R. G. (2004). Accountability Policies and Teacher Decision Making: Barriers to the Use of Data to Improve Practice. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1258–1287 Kane, T.J. & Staiger, D.O. (2002b). Validity in School Test Scores: Implications for Test-Based Accountability Systems, Brookings Papers on Education Policy. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution. Klieme, E. et al. (2004). The development of national educational standards. An expertise. Education reform, 1. Bonn: Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Kuper, H. (2001). Organisationen im Erziehungssystem. Vorschläge zu einer systemtheoretischen Revision des erziehungswissenschaftlichen Diskurses über Organisation. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 4(1), 83-106 Kuper, H. (2004). Das Thema ‚Organisation’ in den Arbeiten Luhmanns über das Erziehungssystem. In D. Lenzen (Ed.). Irritationen des Erziehungssystems, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 122-151 Kuper, H. (2005). Evaluation im Bildungssystem, eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. Kuper, H./Hartung, V. (2007): Überzeugungen zur Verwendung des Wissens aus Lernstandserhebungen. Eine professionstheoretische Analyse. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 10(2), 214-229 Louis, K. Seashore, Febey, K., & Schroeder, R. (2005). State-Mandated Accountability in High Schools: Teachers' Interpretations of a New Era. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 27(2), 177-204 Luhmann, N. (2000). Organisation und Entscheidung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Luhmann, N. & Schorr, K.E. (1979). Das Technologiedefizit der Erziehungswissenschaften und die Pädagogik. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 85, 345-365 Luyten, H., Visscher, A., & Witziers, B. (2005). School Effectiveness Research: From a Review of the Criticism to Recommendations for Further Development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(3), 249-279 Meyer, H.-D., & Rowan, B. (Eds.). (2006). The new institutionalism in education. Albany: State University of New York Press. Meyer, J. W., Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363 Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall. Parsons, T. (1939). The Professions and Social Structure. Social Forces 17, 457-467 Parsons, T. (1968). Professions. International Encyclopedia of the Social Science 12, 536-547 Parsons, T. (1978). Research with Human Subjects and the ‘Professional Complex”. In T. Parsons (1978). Action Theory and the Human Condition, New York: Free Press, 35-65 Strauss, Anselm L., Professions, Work and Careers, New Brunswick: Transactio Rowan, B. (2006). The New Institutionalism and the Study of Educational Organizations: Changing Ideas for Changing Times. In: Meyer, H.-D. & Rowan, B. (Eds.) (2006). The New Institutionalism in Education. New York: State University of New York Press. 15-32 Rueschemeyer, D. (1964). Doctors and Lawyers: A Comment on the Theory of the Professions. Canadian Review of Sociology & Anthropology, I(1), 17–30 Rueschemeyer, D. (1983). Professional Autonomy and the Control of Expert Services. In R. Dingwall, & P. Lewis (Eds.), The Sociology of the Professions: Laywers, Doctors, and Others (pp. 38–58). New York: St. Martin's Press. Spillane, J. P. (2000). Cognition and Policy Implementation: District Policymakers and the Reform of Mathematics Education. Cognition and Instruction, 18(2), 141–179 Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy Implementation and Cognition: Reframing and Refocusing Implementation Research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431 Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Stake, R.E (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Qualitative Research (pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Strauss, A. L. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Visscher, A. J., & Coe, R. (Eds.) (2002). School improvement through performance feedback. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger. Visscher, A. J., & Coe, R. (2003). School Performance Feedback Systems: Conceptualization, Analysis, and Reflection. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 321-349 Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19 Weick, K. E. (1982). Administering Education in Loosely Coupled Schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 63(10), 673–676 Weick, K. E. (1993). The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652 Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Foundations for organizational science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Weick, K. E. (2001). Making Sense of the Organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers. Yin, R. K. (2005). Case study research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Zucker, L. G. (1980). Institutional Structure and Organizational Processes: The Role of Evaluation Units in Schools. Los Angeles, CA: California University, Center for the Study of Evaluation.