Session Information
Contribution
The point of departure for identifying possible areas/issues to be included in the tool to be developed was to identify the needs of the potential users and beneficiaries of such a supporting system. In the light of these a number of target groups were classified and additionally addressed. The target groups were: Practioners - Institutions and Key Experts working with quality assessment in the context of self-evaluation. In a number of interviews, often set up as focus group interviews, were subsequently conducted with the above mentioned groups. The context for the interview was quality assurance and how self-evaluation can contribute the overall enhancement of the services delivered with in the area of CTV. The feedback from the respondents in the participating countries provided the working group members with an extensive number of need and requirements to be met in order to prepare and introduce a self evaluation instrument. The feedback was analysed, discussed, prioritised and finally structured into levels dimension in the self evaluation tool. The levels constitute different ways of how to approach self evaluation:Structural - Institutional - Team/Colleagues - Individual level. The dimensions represent the grouping of the feedback into main areas/focus points like teaching and learning experiences, recognition and assessment and networking. The levels and dimension will be further elaborated in the symposium.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.