A Good Enough Job: The Vocational Path To Workplace Inclusion In Small And Medium-Sized Companies
Author(s):
Fabio Dovigo (presenting / submitting) Emanuela Zappella (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

02 SES 04 C, VET Pathways and Partnerships

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-03
09:00-10:30
Room:
B025 Anfiteatro
Chair:
Vidmantas Tutlys

Contribution

Besides being essential for economic and personal growth, work is one of the factors that allow the social inclusion of disabled people (Blustein, 2008; Bruyère, Erickson, Ferrentino, 2003). However, the unrealistic expectations of workers and employers along with the unwillingness of colleagues to collaborate frequently hinder the work experience of disabled people (Stone, Colella,, 1996). Even though Italian law (68/99) requires employers to hire a percentage of disabled workers, legislation in itself is unable to ensure their effective inclusion in companies (Lalive et al. 2013).

Research shows that the main factors affecting the inclusion of disabled people in organizations are personal traits (attributes of the disabled person and the employer), environmental factors (size and types of activities), and organizational characteristics such as norms, values, policies, the nature of jobs, and reward systems (Stone, Colella, 1996; Heerkens, 2004).

Disability management analysis has especially focused on the issue of matching companies’ productivity goals with the needs of workers through “reasonable accommodation” conceived of as an interactive process involving employee, employer and colleagues (Geisen, 2008).

Recent studies highlight that employers’ attitudes towards inclusion play a key role in ensuring the successful integration of disabled people at work. The literature emphasizes some important issues:

-       Understanding of disability: employers can embrace either a “medical” or a “social” model, seeing disability just like a personal problem or, conversely, considering how the environmental aspects (organizational procedures and practices) may “disable” people and affect them (Barnes, Mercier, Shakespeare, 2009);

-       Size and type of activities: large companies generally choose their employees according to aptitude tests and are more able to manage the hiring process. Conversely, in small and medium size businesses the process essentially relies on intuition and turns out to be more problematic (Davidson, 2011);

-       Organizational culture: disabled people prefer organizational cultures that enhance collaboration among employees rather than  environments that emphasize individualism and competition (Hartnett et al. 2011; Shur, Kruse, Blank, 2005);

-       Attitudes: employer affective reactions and behaviours towards disability in the work setting affect crucial dimensions such as hiring decisions, provision of accommodations, performance appraisals, costs related to workplace accommodation, safety, and additional duties (Burke et al. 2013; Australian Government, 2011; Ren et al., 2008);

-       Previous experience: negative past experiences lead employers to be more reluctant about new hiring options. Conversely, positive experience and greater knowledge about disabled people would encourage employers toward hiring prospects, particularly since disabled people constitute a loyal pool of workers (Lyth, 2012);

-       Negotiation of accommodations: reasonable adjustments to the work environment are associated with positive outcomes such as increased job tenure, improved individual performances, and employee’ satisfaction. Educational services could play a crucial role in mediating the different needs in order to improve the workplace experience (Gold et al. 2012; Kulkarni, Kote, 2013)

 

Our research aims to identify the elements that influence the hiring of disabled people and facilitate their inclusion in the workplace. Focusing on a sample of small and medium Italian enterprises, we interviewed employers and employees and examined the factors which ease or hinder successful job placement. Moreover, through the analysis of two case studies we classified the key elements facilitating the matching between employers and workers within organizations. Finally, we offer practical suggestions for improving the management of the hiring experience.

Method

We adopted a mixed-methods approach in the investigation, using three instruments: - A questionnaire sent to all the companies that hired a disabled worker in the past year, aimed at measuring the employers’ degree of satisfaction about the experience and checking their willingness to repeat it; - In-depth interviews carried out with 30 employers and disabled workers during the hiring process to capture the recruitment practices in real time (thus limiting problems of recall in retrospective interviews). The collected data has been analyzed using the interpretative phenomenological approach (IPA) addressed at exploring in detail the participants’ views about their experience. The results have been subsequently retuned with the participants using the Delphi method to share the interpretation of data and obtain further details; - Two longitudinal case studies offered the opportunity of investigating the various stages of the hiring process and exploring tools which can allow employers to manage the inclusion of a disabled worker in a more conscious way. We followed the career path of two workers (one with physical disabilities, the other one with mental problem) from the first employment application to the end of the trial period into a supermarket. Moreover, we analyzed how supervision activity is managed, carrying out direct observations, collecting accounts from the supervisors, and investigating the methods they adopt to introduce accommodations in the workplace. Finally, we introduced two experimental tools addressed to ease the companies in managing the hiring process of disabled people: a battery of indicators directed to assess the level of inclusiveness of the workplace; and a set of operational guidelines for improving the interaction with disabled workers.

Expected Outcomes

Our research shows that employers’ attitudes play a key role in influencing decisions which are crucial in hindering or promoting the effective inclusion of disabled workers. Such decisions apply to five organizational and educational areas of intervention: • Management of the recruitment process: employers can choose to internally manage the recruitment process or ask external services for help in supporting worker’s inclusion and encouraging colleagues to get involved in developing an inclusive environment; • Placement of the employee: the employee may be relegate to a marginal role, addressed to execute poor or inessential tasks, or do a job useful to the organization, especially designed through an analysis of organizational activities; • Evaluation of the worker: the applicant can be evaluated according to the disability (what he/she is not able to do) or the ability and actual work potential (what he/she can do with the aid of assistive technology and the support of colleagues); • Membership of the organization: the company can recognize as members only workers who meet a “regular” standard or can extend membership to actively include all workers, disabled or not, within the organization; • Introduction of accommodations: the company may decide to limit any change in workplace organization or negotiate improvements with the workers to make the work environment and procedures more inclusive. To date, few attempts have been done to develop educational strategies aiming to support employers in dealing effectively with these critical decisions. Our inquiry suggests that promoting employers’ training through the extensive use of indicators and guidelines would be highly beneficial for helping them to plan and put into practice an inclusive workplace, so ensuring a high quality work experience for all.

References

Australian Government, (2011) Employer perspectives on recruiting people with disability and the role of Disability Employment Services, Employment Monitoring and Evaluation Branch. Barnes C., Mercer G., Shakespeare, T., (1999) Exploring Disability: A Sociological Introduction. Polity Press, Cambridge. Blustein, D. L. (2008) The role of work in psychological health and well-being: A conceptual, historical, and public policy perspective. American Psychologist, 63, 228–240. Bruyère S., Erickson W., Ferrentino, J. (2003) Identity and disability in the workplace. William and Mary Law Review, 44(3), 1173-1196. Burke J. et al. (2013) Employers' Attitudes Towards Hiring and Retaining People with Disabilities: A Review of the Literature. The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, / Volume 19 / Issue 01 / July 2013, pp 21-38. Davidson J., (2011) A Qualitative Study Exploring Employers' Recruitment. Behaviour and Decisions: Small and Medium Enterprises, Leeds. Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report No 754. Gold, P. B., Oire, S. N., Fabian, E. S., & Wewiorski, N. J. (2012) Negotiating reasonable workplace accommodations: perspectives of employers, employees with disabilities, and rehabilitation service providers. Journal of Voc Rehabil, 37(1), 25–37. Hartnett HP, Stuart H, Thurman H, Loy B, Batiste LC (2011) Employers’ perceptions of the benefits of workplace accommodations: reasons to hire, retain and promote people with disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2011;34(1):17–23. Heerkens, Y., (2004) The use of the ICF to describe work related factors influencing the health of employees. Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 26(17), 1060-1066. Kulkarni M., Kote J. (2013) Increasing Employment of People with Disabilities: The Role and Views of Disability Training and Placement Agencies. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. Lalive R. et al. (2013) “Do financial incentives affect firms’ demand for disabled workers?” Journal of the european economic association, February 2013, 11(1), pp. 25-58. Lyth M., (2012) Employers' attitudes to the employment of the disabled. Occupation psychology, Vol 47(1-2). Ren, L.R., Paetzold, R.L., Colella, A., (2008) A meta-analysis of experimental studies on the effects of disability on human resource judgments. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 191–203. Schur, L., Kruse, D., Blanck, P., (2005) Corporate Culture and the Employment of Persons with Disabilities. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23: 3-20. Stone, D.A, Colella, A., (1996) A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, 352-401.

Author Information

Fabio Dovigo (presenting / submitting)
Bergamo University, Italy
Emanuela Zappella (presenting)
University of Bergamo
Human Science
Bergamo

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.