Role And Task Division In Duch Vet Teacher Teams
Author(s):
Patricia Brouwer (presenting / submitting) Carlos van Kan
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

02 SES 06 B, Teachers and Teaching in VET

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-03
15:30-17:00
Room:
B027 Anfiteatro
Chair:
Marja-Leena Stenström

Contribution

Along with the implementation of competence-based education in Dutch senior vocational education working in teams was introduced. Teacher teams are considered a success factor in increasing the quality of education (MBO raad, 2009). Teachers are responsible for educational as well as organizational tasks, which often surpass the capabilities of one single team member. The mutual responsibility for a wide range of team tasks requires different combinations of expertise within a teacher team (Wesselink, 2010; van Veldhuizen, 2011) According to the formal collective terms of employment, teams are responsible for the process and outcome of the division of roles and tasks. However, research about working in teams in Dutch senior vocational education, particularly focusing on the division of roles and tasks, is scarce. Consequently there is limited insight in how the role and task division is currently constituted and in what underlying rationales for the role and task division are.

 

The overall aim of this research is to contribute to the scholarly base as well as help team managers and teams in Dutch senior vocational education understand the complexity of the division of roles and tasks by making the rationales behind this division explicit. Subsequently team managers and their teams can make better-informed decisions with regard to the way they organize the work they are responsible for. Therefore, this study focuses on (1) gaining insight in how the role and task division is currently constituted in teams in senior vocational education from the perspective of team managers, and (2) exploring underlying rationales from the perspective of team managers.

 

Senior secondary education comprises vocational programmes at four qualification levels for youngsters who have completed the first compulsory cycle of secondary education. At each qualification level, students are able to choose whether they learn in the workplace or in school. Various combinations are possible with a minimum of either one-day learning in school or one day learning in the workplace. Graduates of courses at the highest qualification level are allowed to enter the bachelor programmes in higher professional education. Ducht VET has a three-folded public assignment. It prepares students for the labor market, it prepares students for being a responsible citizen, and it prepares students for entering higher professional education.  

Expertise in a VET-team mostly comprises of 5 roles that teachers take on as part of their work (see eg. Schuiling, 2011; Wesselink, 2010; van Veldhuizen, 2011, Noij & Koster, 2012):

1)    The Expert. ‘In the expert role teachers possess relevant knowledge of their discipline, being able to stimulate students to develop this disciplinary knowledge as well, and stay up to date by scanning the environment and listening to students and colleagues from within their educational institution and professional practice’ (Wesselink, 2010 p. 54).

2)    The Coach. ‘The role of coach consists of facilitating students’ learning processes and assisting students in their preparation for their future professions’ (Wesselink, 2010 p. 54).

3)    The assessor. ‘The assessor is responsible for evaluating, diagnosing and monitoring students’ competence level and development, for conducting formative and summative assessments and ensuring that the assessments are authentic by involving relevant persons from practice’ (Wesselink, 2010 p. 54).

4)    The developer. ‘The developer can be described as designing learning activities and developing learning materials and assessment procedures in cooperation with colleagues’ (Wesselink, 2010 p. 55).

5)    The manager. ‘The manager checks the quality of learning and assessment processes and improves quality where necessary. The manager keeps in contact with external parties relevant to the learning process, such as workplace trainers and colleagues from other educational institutions’ (Wesselink, 2010 p. 55).

Method

A multiple case study methodology was conducted. To answer our main research questions team managers from twelve senior vocational education institutes were interviewed, using a semi-structured interview protocol. Because teams do not operate in a vacuum interview questions were asked at macro- (institute), meso- (domain) and micro- (team) level. Besides questions about the role and task division other themes that are likely to connect to the role and task division in teams were included, such as organizational structure, physical location of teams, leadership, collaboration, autonomy, self-directedness and team effectiveness. In addition, team plans were analyzed because they include a formal overview of roles and tasks per team member. Aiming at maximum variation sampling, the case selection was based on variation in geographical location of vocational education institutions, size, and educational domain. Note: in a follow-up study the perspective of team members will be also be included. The analysis of the interview fragments and the development of an analytic framework was part of an iterative process. Categories and codes in a descriptive framework do not exclusively emerge from the data but are equally generated by the theoretical approach: ‘Particular research questions and concerns generate certain categories. Certain theoretical approaches and academic disciplines suggest particular coding schemes’ (Corbin & Strauss, 1998). In other words, both the theoretical concepts and the empirical data guide the way the data are arranged and, subsequently, how the results and conclusions of a study are reached.

Expected Outcomes

Concerning the first focus of our study, the following results can be reported: (1) across institutions for senior vocational education that were part of our study, a variety of role and task divisions can be distinguished, (2) team design varied between team managers within institutions en between institutions, and (3) team managers reported that they have a high level of autonomy when it comes to team design, i.e. in particular the division of roles and tasks. The findings of the study with regard to the second focus of the study are: (1) rationales behind role and task division are mainly based on organizational and functional aspects such as such as the number of students, seniority of team members and workload, and (2) team managers do not tend to involve aspects such as team development and interpersonal work relations within teams in their rationales behind role and task division. From the results it can be concluded that with regard to the participating teacher teams, the functional role and task division varies across and within institutions for senior vocational education. This way teams are flexible to react to regional context variables such as developments in small and medium sized enterprises and student population. A second conclusion is that from the perspective of team managers mainly organizational and functional aspects seem to be part of the rationale behind the role and task division. Team managers have little attention for aspects of teamwork that relate to team development, and interpersonal relations.

References

• MBO Raad (2009). Professioneel statuut. De Bilt: MBO Raad. • Noij, L. & W. Koster (2012). Een functieontwerp en opleidingsbouwwerk voor rolgerichte professionalisering van docenten. In: R. Klarus & S. Weijzen (Red.), Mensen maken beroepsonderwijs, (pp. 107-122). Den Haag: Boom Lemma. • Schuiling, G. (2011). Rolgerichte competentieontwikkeling. Rollenportfolio’s in beroepsonderwijs, industrie en Dienstverlening. HAN press: Nijmegen. • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (Eds.). (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage: Thousand Oaks. • Truijen, K. (2012). Teaming teachers [doctoral thesis]. Gildeprint Drukkerijen: Enschede. • van Veldhuizen, B. (2011). Learning at Work, Working to Learn. Professional Development of Teachers from the Personal and Organizational Perspective [doctoral thesis]. Gildeprint Drukkerijen: Enschede. • Wesselink, R. (2010). Comprehensive competence-based vocational education: the development and use of a curriculum analysis and improvement model [doctoral thesis]. Wageningen University: Wageningen.

Author Information

Patricia Brouwer (presenting / submitting)
ecbo
's-Hertogenbosch
ecbo
Vorden

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.