Educational equity and its implications: how German pupils conceive of inequality, tracking and segregation
Author(s):
Stefan Müller-Mathis (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

07 SES 05 JS, Joint Session NW 07 and NW 25

Paper Session Joint Session NW 07 and NW 25

Time:
2014-09-03
11:00-12:30
Room:
B007 Anfiteatro
Chair:
Nina Thelander

Contribution

Educational equity is on the top of political issues. During the last decade in Germany educational reforms tried intensely to decouple educational chances from social and ethnic backgrounds. A lot of people would agree that educational success should not depend on social and ethnic characteristics of pupils. However, the question whether inequality in education is unfair is still subject of controversial public discussion. There is a variety of ideas and opinions engendering how schools have to proceed to ensure justice for all. Centering on educational equity and its implications this paper explores what adolescents at the end of upper secondary education have learnt about educational justice in a multi-ethnic and economically structured society. This is a research investigation on pupil’s views on justice decoding their implications for equity in education.

In depth the empirical research systemizes two facets. At first I ask for pupils´ conceptions of justice evaluating the educational system of Germany: what do they think is fair or unfair in school education? Pupils were seen as experts of schooling who appraise critically of inequalities, tracking and (social and ethnic) segregation. As Gorard and Smith (2010) have declared in their international study examining pupils views on educational equity, young learners in tracked and stratified school systems perceive more inequality compared to pupils in inclusive school systems. I conceptualize a comparable interest, exploring the German case which is neglected in international research activities so far. Because of the high rate of inequality and segregation in German secondary school tracking it could be assumed that German adolescents perceive some inequalities in education. Furthermore, the empirical work investigates young learners´ understanding of socioeconomic, cultural and political inequity (see Fraser 2003/ Keddie 2012). Finally, I discuss if their thinking about inequalities, tracking and (social and ethnic) segregation could or couldn´t implicate an educational policy that minimizes social and ethnic stratification in education. It is a core question what they expect from politics. Secondly I ask for their experiences of inequalities in daily school life: what do they learn about diversity and racism at school and how do they get involved in inequality and segregation? The second core question understands the pupils as social agents being part of segregated spaces. We know a lot about the importance of informal learning of tolerance and social cohesion in peer constellations at school (Abs et al. 2009/ Buhl et al. 2011). It can be supposed that pupils´perspectives and their understanding of tolerance go back to the kind of experiences they make in learning and living together or separate. Do they value or devalue a more social and ethnic cohesive community and society? In the end the implications for educational equity and the experiences of diversity and inequality will be compared. This paper illustrates what pupils in a tracked and stratified school system learn about justice and it spotlights the risks and chances for the multi-ethnic German society.

At the ECER in Spain two years ago I presented first ideas of my research. In Porto I will show the final results closing by a discussion of inequality and justice in education brought from the German case to a European level.   

Method

The research activity is part of the international project “Perceptions of Inequalities” (Kolokitha and Preston 2009/ Janmaat et al. 2012) conducted by the University of London (UK). The focus of my presentation was inquired in-depth for an extended German part sample by the University of Giessen (Germany). The study builds mainly on qualitative analysis of 17 semi-structured interviews with adolescents in German upper secondary education. I talked to pupils in a “Gymnasium” (academic track), in a “Berufsschule” (vocational track) and in a remedial action for dropouts. The interviewees included in the sample show different social and ethnic backgrounds as well as different educational trajectories and prospects for life. Therefore the sample allows discovering large contrasts, but doesn’t miss exploring similarities youngsters share. Interviews were analysed comparatively using the analytical modes of content analysis and “documentary interpretation” (Nohl 2010).

Expected Outcomes

Finally, do German pupils perceive inequalities in education? Contrary to previous assumptions the results show that they actually believe in equal chances in education (Janmaat et al. 2012). The qualitative interpretation indicates that young citizens tend to justify inequalities by meritocratic principles and that only a few of them rethink their education through the lens of socioeconomic, cultural and political aspects of injustice. Thus most of them know to legitimate early tracking and segregation, they focus on individualistic factors. Their tolerant attitudes towards social and ethnic others in education are developed rather from a distance, than in daily interactions. Temporary experiences of diversity are out of school experience. The making up of people was observed as a kind of othering concerning school type, social background and ethnic belongings. Especially meritocratic justifications and “groupism” (Brubaker 2007) turned out as problematic for social cohesion. It is time to refocus on the beliefs of inequality and justice pupils adapt in educational systems in Europe (see Janmaat et al. 2012). This study regains the voices of young citizens in the education they get and it depicts potential risks for a multi-ethnic and social cohesive society.

References

Abs, H. J./ H. Breit/ A. Huppert/ A. Schmidt und S. Müller-Mathis (2009): Germany. In Jaap Scheerens (Hg.). Informal Learning of Active Citizenship at School. An International Comparative Study in Seven European Countries. Berlin. Brubaker, R. (2004): Ethnicity without Groups. Harvard University Press. Buhl, M./ H. Kuper/ A. Goldenbaum/ J. Höhler/ D. Lindner und S. Müller-Mathis (2011): Bericht zur Evaluation des Buddy-Landesprogramms in Hessen. Frankfurt am Main. Fraser, N. (2003): Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation. In N. Fraser and A. Honneth (Ed.). Redistribution or Recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. Verso. Gorard, S. und E. Smith (2010): Equity in Education. An international Comparison of Pupil´s Perspectives. Basingstoke. Janmaat, J. G./ B. Hoskins/ S. Mueller-Mathis and H. J. Abs (2011): Perceptions of Inequalities. Technical Report and First Results. llakes.co.uk. Keddie, A. (2012). Schooling and social justice through the lenses of Nancy Fraser. In: Critical Studies in Education, Vol. 53, No. 3. Kolokitha, M. and J. Preston (2009): Inequalities at a `glance´. LLAKES Newsletter, 09 (2). Nohl, A.-M. (2010): The Documentary Interpretation of Narrative Interviews. In: Bohnsack, R./ N. Pfaff and W. Weller (Ed.): Qualitative Analysis and Documentary Method in International Educational Research. Opladen.

Author Information

Stefan Müller-Mathis (presenting / submitting)
University of Giessen
Herr
Giessen

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.