Entangled Histories of Handicraft Education: Prussia and Italy between 1870 and 1914
Author(s):
Elena Tabacchi (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

17 SES 12, Paper Session

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-05
09:00-10:30
Room:
B221 Sala de Aulas
Chair:
Geert Thyssen

Contribution

This paper aims to rethink the significance of the cultural transfers, social actors behind and spaces of the internationalization of pedagogical knowledge between Prussia and Italy by looking at the development of a specific discipline: handicraft education or manual training.

The research covers the three last decades of the nineteenth century up to the First World War (1870 – 1914).

The last decades of the nineteenth century saw an increasing demand for industrial workers in both Italy and Germany and, even though in both countries the industrialization process was a regional phenomenon, it had a profound effect on the national pedagogical debate and hence on the implementation of a national school system after the respective unifications. 

It may be added that, only in time of intense industrialization and nation building, like the second half of 19th century was, manual training achieved a new relevance and reached a larger political and cultural audience.

For one of the most ardent propagandists of Froebel's theory in Italy, Italian teacher Adolph Pick, the Kindergarten represented the best solution for the industrial society to come: in this space, children could learn to cooperate and work together, while at the same time preventing the spread of social conflict (Pick 1929). But Froebel was not the only reference for the Italian reformers; between the end of the 1870s and the beginning of the 1880s, the Manual Training Movement (Handfertigkeitsbewegung) expanded in Germany and attracted much attention. 

In Italy the new interest in the development of a work-oriented education system was linked not only to the modernization process under-way in the country, but also to the new electoral bill. In 1882 the voting right was extended to all those citizens who could read and, even though in number terms it represented a weak democratization of the Italian electoral body, it had great political significance. Primary school took on a new importance and shaping good citizens through school became a central issue on the political agenda of the Liberal elites. 

Starting in the second half of the nineteenth century, Italian reformers began to frequently cross the national borders in order to observe and learn innovative pedagogical techniques, such as those of the Kindergarten or those of the School of Manual Training in Leipzig; meanwhile, some of the most ardent Froebelian propagandists travelled in Italy and helped to extend the German pedagogue’s success. In 1885, the Minister of Education approved the inclusion of Froebel’s Kindergarten in teacher-training schools and promoted pedagogical missions abroad in order to collect information about the foreign systems of manual schooling. In 1894, inspired by Froebel's theory, handicraft education was introduced to the primary school curriculum.

A benchmark may be considered the introduction of manual training in primary school curriculum reform in 1894, by the Italian minister of education Guido Baccelli.

The minister provided in 1899 special guidelines for those teachers who wanted to develop handicraft education in their school. For the first time, with the teaching of manual training, strong differences between male and female education were introduced at primary school level. 

Method

For the first part, the correspondence, reports and works of the so-called gatekeepers will be useful to map the networks within which the pedagogical knowledge and practice circulated. In this case, Bertha von Marenholz and Julia Schwabe's letters are very illuminating. They organized visits and trips abroad for female teachers of Froebel's pedagogy and handicraft education and it has been recently noticed that they frequently send teachers to Hamburg (Albisetti 2006). In the Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana in Rome, it is possible to examine the correspondence between Julia Schwabe and Pasquale Villari. Other information about international meetings and exhibitions might be provided by both Italian and German pedagogical journals. In the second part, the research will turn to the institutional outcomes. How did this stage of internationalization of pedagogical knowledge shape the Italian scenario? As Michel Espagne and Michel Werner pointed out in their research about the French university system, cultural transfer does not exclusively affect intellectual debates, but deeply shapes the institutional and political sphere too. From this perspective, this concept may shed some light on the reception of German pedagogical theories and practices in Italy at different levels (Espagne-Werner 1985; Charles-Schriewer-Wagner 2004). In the third part, I will outline what ideological meanings were associated to handicraft education, in order to analyse the shift in the way of thinking the social purpose of manual training in the age of intense industrialization. More specifically, the core objective of this section is to outline how the new concept of handicraft education shaped the construction of gender and class categories and how the internationalization of pedagogical knowledge influenced the debate.

Expected Outcomes

This research aims to outline the impact of the transnational circulation of pedagogical knowledge between two well-connected areas (Prussia and Italy) and to point out the contributions of a number of social actors. Even though a transnational approach to this field has barely been explored with regard to the Italian context, it may offer an original point of view on the history of the curriculum reforms in the “age of nationalism” and so on the history of the construction of national identity via school media.

References

C. CHARLES, J, SCHRIEWER, P. WAGNER (eds), Transnational Intellectual Networks. Forms of Academic Knowledge and the search for cultural identities, Chicago, 2004. A. CHERVEL, L'histoire de disciplines scolaires, in “Histoire de l'Education”, 38, 1988, pp. 59 – 119. M. ESPAGNE, M. WERNER, Deutsch-Französischer Kulturtransfer im 18. und 19. Jh.: Zu einem neuen interdisziplinären Forschungsprogramm des C.N.R.S, in “Francia” 13, 1985, pp. 502–510. B. LATOUR, Reassembling the social. An introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford, 2005. T. POPKEWITZ (ed.), Rethinking the History of Education. Transnational Perspectives its Questions, Methods and Knowledge, London, 2013. J. C. ALBISETTI, Froebel Crosses the Alps: Introducing the Kindergarten in Italy, in “History of Education Quarterly”, 49, 2009, pp. − Education for Poor Neapolitan Children: Julie Schwabe's Nineteenth Century Secular Mission, in “History of Education”, 35, 2006, pp. 637–652. C. MAYER, Female Education and the Cultural Transfer of Pedagogical Knowledge in eighteenth century, in “Paedagogica Historica”, 48, 2012, pp. 511 – 526. D. MATASCI, Le système scolaire français et ses mirroirs. Les missions pédagogiques entre comparaison internationale et circulation des savoirs (1850-1914), in “Histoire de l’Education”, 125, 2010, pp. 5-26.

Author Information

Elena Tabacchi (presenting / submitting)
University of Florence
History
Firenze

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.