Session Information
20 SES 07 A, Intercultural Learning, Identity and Citizenship
Paper Session
Contribution
Research Questions and Objectives: The focus of this research is to investigate Cypriot and immigrant children’s experiences of intercultural pedagogical practices inCyprus. This study also aims to explore children’s suggestions for the improvement of policies and practices for intercultural education. In addition, we examine whether Cypriot and immigrant students share similar or different conceptualisations and understandings regarding the above aspects. In a setting that lacks a research culture, this study aims to point out Cypriot and immigrant children’s understanding of the disparities, conflicts and dilemmas, but also of the prospects of intercultural education inCyprus.
Theoretical Framework: In the recent years, listening to children’s voices has gradually arisen in the agenda of education research as an important aspect that facilitates school improvement (e.g. Rudduck et al., 1996; Raymond, 2001). Beyond education research, listening to children’s voices has been also stimulated by international organisations, such as the United Nations (UN) through the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UN, 1989). Furthermore, previous research has shown that listening to children’s voices is a prerequisite in order to develop inclusion (e.g. Tangen, 2008; Messiou, 2011). Messiou (2006) argues that children may better identify the factors that impede or promote inclusion in their schools, while they may challenge segregationist practices that enhance marginalisation. In addition, Stevens (2008: 184) argues that research should examine students’ understanding of racism in order to make ‘inferences about the impact of racism on students’ self-esteem and educational outcomes.
Despite concerns in the international literature, in the Cypriot context, there is little evidence that children’s voices have been taken into consideration in the research focusing on school policies and practices for intercultural education. Nevertheless, Ainscow et al. (1999: 39) argue that ‘without listening to the often hidden voices of students it is impossible to understand fully the policies and practices of individual schools’. Taking a step further, we argue that research should listen to children’s voices in order to fully examine the policy trajectory, including policy development and implementation. Arguably, the definition of intercultural education as an approach, in which every individual takes action towards social emancipation (Tiedt & Tiedt, 2002), necessitates the involvement of children in both the decision-making and implementation of intercultural education policy.
In the Cypriot context, little research engages with children’s voices and their experiences in the area of inclusion and/or intercultural education’s. Firstly, Messiou’s research (2006; 2011) on students’ experiences of marginalisation within primary schools, concluded that children conceptualise marginalisation in adverse ways. Although some children recognise that they are marginalised and make efforts to alter this situation, other children either do not feel it or do not admit it. Moreover, Nicolaou et al.’s (2007) research focusing on high-school students’ attitudes of cultural diversity showed that students held both positive and negative attitudes towards the ethnic ‘other’. Partasi’s (2009; 2011) study on identity and belonging in culturally diverse classrooms indicated that immigrant students experience an identity conflict struggling between their family and peer cultures. In addition, the participant children referred to racist incidents against immigrant students because of their skin colour and their dress code.
Apparently, research encompassing children’s voices in theCypruscontext has not thoroughly, if at all, examined children’s understandings of education policy regarding intercultural education. However, children’s meanings of a change that is proposed may become a factor that could prevent (or promote) change. Thus, Rudduck et al. (1996) contends that if these meanings are not connected to the purpose of the proposed change, they will act as barriers or resistance to change, while children will continue to safeguard tradition.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
References: Ainscow, M., Booth, T. & Dyson, A. (1999). Inclusion and exclusion in schools: Listening to some hidden voices. In: K. Ballard (Ed.) Inclusive Education: International Voices on Disability and Justice (pp.139-151). London: Falmer Press. Chamberlin-Quinlisk, C. & Senyshyn, R. M. (2012). Language teaching and intercultural education: Making critical connections. Intercultural Education, 23(1), 15-23. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd Edition). California: Sage Publications, Inc. Hajisoteriou, C. (2012). Intercultural education set forward: Operational strategies and procedures of Cypriot classrooms. Intercultural Education, 23(2), 133-146. Messiou, K. (2006). Conversations with children: Making sense of marginalisation in primary school settings. European Journal of Special Needs Education,21(1), 39-54. Messiou, K. (2011). Collaborating with children in exploring marginalisation: An approach to inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, DOI:10.1080/13603116.2011.572188 Nicolaou, A., Nitsiou, C. & Charalambous, S. (2007). Cypriot high schools as cultural mosaics: Pupils’ perspectives and experiences. International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations, 7, 343-351. Partasi, E. (2009). Identity and belonging in a culturally diverse classroom in Cyprus. International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations, 9(2), 146-156. Partasi, E. (2011). Experiencing multiculturalism in Greek-Cypriot primary schools. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 41(3), 371-386. Raymond, L. (2001). Student involvement in school improvement: From data source to significant voice. Forum, 43(2), 58-61. Rudduck, J., Chaplain, R. & Wallace, G. (1996). Pupil voices and school improvement, in: J. Rudduck, R. Chaplain, & G. Wallace (eds) School Improvement: What can pupils tell us? London: David Fulton. Stables, A. (2005). Multiculturalism and moral education: Individual positioning, dialogue and cultural practice. Journal of Moral Education, 34(2), 185-197. Stevens, P. A. J. (2008). Exploring pupils’ perceptions of teacher racism in their context: A case study of Turkish and Belgian vocational education pupils in a Belgian school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(2), 175-187. Tangen, R. (2008). Listening to children’s voices in educational research: Some theoretical and methodological problems. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(2), 157-166. Tiedt, P. L. & Tiedt, I. M. (2002). Multicultural Teaching: A Handbook of Activities, Information and Resources (Sixth edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.