Dialogue and Partnership in Secondary Vocational Education and Training for Learning Communities
Author(s):
Magdolna Benke (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

02 SES 04 C, VET Pathways and Partnerships

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-03
09:00-10:30
Room:
B025 Anfiteatro
Chair:
Vidmantas Tutlys

Contribution

The topic of the proposal is rooted in the research of learning regions and learning communities, in connection to my PhD dissertation in preparation.  

All learning region concept emphasizes the importance of learning within and between organizations. This process is a learning partnership that will create added value for the participants. The learning region concepts have some common building blocks, as of dialogue, partnership, recognizing the importance of local knowledge, innovation processes launch, bottom-up initiatives, development and co-operation of networks (Florida, 1995; Asheim 1996; Morgan 1997; Putnam, 1993; Lundvall 1996).

The learning region concept represents a serious promise for development policy in support of lifelong learning. The European Commission supported a number of projects and programs aimed at the creation of that learning regions (R3L + program, Telson, PENR3L, the Learning Regions Network in Germany).

Based on the literature it is clear that in recent years, along with the continuation of the discourse on the learning regions, growing attention is being paid to the learning communities, as well.

Some authors are linking the topic learning community to vocational education and training. „The linking of learning to regional economic development will invoke a new organisational paradigm for education and training that is embedded more within the community, not in central policy agencies”. (Kimberley, 2003) And, also Kimberley emphasizes the new challange VET meets in relation to the learning communities. ”VET can meet the postmodern challenge to satisfy the paradox of simultaneously working from the bottom up (learning community enterprise) and the top down (policy imperatives) (Kimberley, 2003). According to the vision of a new EU project, new, untraditional partnerships can play an important role in the development of learning communities. Interest and capacity of citizens about learning means the most precious resource of the learning community matters (Gejel, 2012). And as regards previous experiences, the challenging ideas of Gustavsen, Nyhan and Deitmer on the learning regions (Cedefop publication 2007), and some concrete European and German pilots, f.e. the Golo project, the works of Kämäräinen and Grollmann are interesting resources to be discussed, too.

The research aims to explore how the different stakeholders involved in the Hungarian secondary vocational education and training system consider the role and the efficiency of dialogue and partnership related to the formation of secondary VET, particularly in respect of the development of local communities.

The main research question is, how local VET institutions can make a contribution to the development of local learning communities, in partnership with the different interestgroups.

Method

An on-line survey was carried out in the beginning of January 2014. The target group consists of the members of the former Hungarian Association of Vocational Education (MSZT), 596 members. MSZT as NGO functioned as a professional forum and provided information for different interest groups who were involved in vocational education and training for 25 years. The Association as NGO was forced to cease in December 2013 and the membership was given the opportunity to join a larger civil society organizations. A few weeks after the termination of the organization members of MSZT may have felt more important to deliver an opinion than a few months earlier. 150 people completed the questionnaire until the end of January. The response rate (25 %) is much higher than my former expectations. The questionnaire is still available, so further responses can be expected. The purpose of the questionnaire is to measure how former members of MSZT feel about the efficiency of partnership, the role of each stakeholder's group and the strength of the partnership related to VET. The questionnaire included a new topic, which has not been previously investigated: people were asked what they think about the relationship between VET and the local communities. The questionnaire consists of multiple choice questions and Likert scale questions. One section of the questionnaire is directed to the main tensions of our VET system, and another is directed to the role of different interest groups in vocational education and training. Deeper processing and analyses of data of survey applying SPSS will start soon. Expert meetings and a few case studies will take place in the spring, after having the result of the analyses of data.

Expected Outcomes

Respondents welcomed the new approach to the topic, searching the link between VET and local communities. Several people have indicated that they look forward to the result of the survey and would like to participate in discussions. The initial phase of processing of the questionnaires showed the following results. Nearly 90 % of respondents agreed that VET institutions can play an important role in the development of local communities in the future. About 80 % of respondents are willing to participate in dialogue and partnership in order to make a contribution to the development of local VET. Respondents' evaluation about their own role in the partnership related to local VET development varies depending on their membership in different interest groups. Since about 50 % of the respondents are teachers or trainers, more information will be needed about the other partners in the second phase of the research. Targeted interviews and case studies can make up for the missing information.

References

BENKE, Magdolna (2013): A tanuló régió – Kihívás és lehetőség. (The Learning Region. Challenge and Opportunity) (PhD Dissertation in preparation, University of Debrecen) (Teamleader: Prof. Dr. Tamás Kozma). BENKE, Magdolna (2013): A tanuló régiók, a tanuló közösségek és a szakképzés. (Learning regions, learning communities and vocational education and training) Vocational Training Review, 29, 3, 5 - 21. GEJEL, Jan (2012): Towards Learning Communities. A guide compendium. www.learningcommunities.eu. European Commission. (2013. 04.11.) KEARNS, Peter, KEARNS, Denise Reghenzani (2010): Some strategies building learning communities and regions. PURE, PASCAL Observatory. http://pure.pascalobservatory.org/print/pascalnow/pascal-expertise/other-resources/some-strategies-building-learning-communities-and-regions (2013.04.02.) KIMBERLEY, Helen (2003): Urban Disadvantage and Learning Communities: Integrating Report. OVAL Research Working Paper, 03-21, The Australian Centre for Organizational, Vocational and Adult Learning, Sydney, The University of Technology. http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/41206/20040331-0000/www.oval.uts.edu.au/publications/0321kimberley.pdf (2013.09.05.) KUPPER, Hendrik et al (2007): Vocational and professional education as regional knowledge centres. Paper presented at VET symposium, ECER, Improving the Knowledge Base through work and learning partnerships between research & development, professional education and industrial business. Ghent. 1-12. LUNDVALL, Bengt-Åke (ed.) (1992): National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter Publishers, London. LUNDVALL, Bengt-Åke (1996): The Social Dimension of The Learning Economy. DRUID WORKING PAPER, NO. 96-1, 1-17. MORGAN , K. (1997): The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal. In Regional Studies, 31, 5, 491-503. NYHAN, Barry, ATTWELL, Graham, DEITMER, Ludger (eds) (1999): Towards the Learning Region: Education and Regional Innovation in the European Union and the United States. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Cedefop Reference Document, 150 p. NYHAN, Barry (2007): Building learning regions for innovation in Europe: a challenge for education and training. In: Gustavsen, B. – Nyhan, B. – Ennals, R. (eds): Learning together for local innovation: promoting learning regions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, (Cedefop Reference series: 68) 16-45. PUTNAM, R. 1993, ‘The prosperous community: Social capital and public life’, The American Prospect, .13, Spring, .35–42. RAY, Ch. (1999): Towards a Meta-Framework of Endogenous Development: Repertoires, Paths, Democracy and Rights. Sociologia Ruralis, 39, 4. 521-538. „Understanding Vocational Excellence: refining the concept; Workshop 2: „VET excellence for smart growth”, Synthesis note, EC (2012)

Author Information

Magdolna Benke (presenting / submitting)
University of Debrecen
CHERD
Budapest

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.