This paper analyses Higher Education (HE) teachers’ learning during a new ERASMUS funded Intensive Programme ‘Exploring the application of Intercultural Dialogue (ICD) as global citizens in a changing world’ (2013-2014). Following the ‘European Year of the Citizen’, (2013) the paper addresses the question: ‘What do we learn about curriculum design from engagement as citizens with the complex local and global issues of our times?’. The HE teachers are drawn from 9 different European countries participating in the Intensive Programme. They represent the broad disciplines of education, international development, economics, social work, teacher training, health, psychology.
It is recognised in some regions that a majority of HE students are expecting to be able to learn about the issues of our times during their studies in Higher Education (Drayson R et al, 2013). It is further argued that students are entitled to learning that is ‘future facing’ so that they are supported in their thinking not just about current but also emergent and future situations (HEA / QAA, 2013). This view is supported at the level of wider European policy formulation:
‘HEIs are the focal points for imparting what is known, interrogating what is not known, producing new knowledge, shaping critical thinkers, problem solvers and doers so that we have the intellectual muscle needed to tackle societal challenges at every level necessary...’ (European Commission High Level Group on the Modernisation of Higher Education: 2013)
Cotton et al further provide evidence from a wide range of subject disciplines that ‘future-fit’ approaches to curriculum design are practicable (Cotton D et al, 2013). Thus the enquiry is relevant to an emerging concern that professional development in HE is able to address contemporary physical and social issues that we commonly face.
The current Intensive Programme is an example of a response to this call. Within the programme students are able to experience the ways in which exposure to broader European contexts is significant for learning about complexities that are played out on the global stage and in their own everyday lives. The themes of ‘diversity’, ‘equality’, ‘ecologies’, ‘economies’ and ‘power’ (DEEP) that unfold within the 9 different European regions represented on the programme are exploited as opportunities for dialogue with others who carry alternative ways of seeing the world. The various case study materials that are being researched and collated provide fresh lenses for staff and students alike to explore complexities in their own lives and works. ICD becomes a vehicle for engagement with new world views that emerge (through external dialogues) and for making sense both in personal and professional terms (through internal dialogues).
As indicated above, the key question for this enquiry is how the teaching team envisage the relevance of learning about such complexities for meaningful curriculum making in their own academic and professional disciplines. Thus the enquiry is centred on teachers’ developing ‘identities’, ‘ethical professional sense’ ‘actions’ and ‘civic self shaping’ (IDEAS) and their experience of the power of ICD as professionals and citizens in this process.
The enquiry is rooted in earlier commentaries, reflected in UNECE 2011, about the need to further develop HE pedagogies to include engagement with a diversity of world views , for example through Wals’ discussion of learning through ‘gestaltswitching’ (Wals A, 2010: 25) and through Meziro’s references to ‘communicative discourse’ as a an educational base in HE:
'The purpose of communicative discourse is to arrive at the best judgement. To do so one must access and understand, intellectually and empathetically, the frame of reference of the other and seek common ground with the widest range of relevant experience and points of view'. (Meziro J, 2009: 93)