The European Qualifications Framework: an evidence-based neutral policy tool?

Author(s):

Pia Cort

Conference:

ECER 2009

Network:

23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education

Format:

Paper

Session Information

23 SES 04 E, Education Policy Making: The European Union

Paper Session

Time:

2009-09-28

16:00-17:30

Room:

HG, HS 45

Chair:

Romuald Normand

Contribution

‘This VET area should be cultivated through the use of common frameworks, instruments and tools and supported by consistent use of comparable data enabling evidence-based policy-making’. ("Maastricht Communiqué on the future priorities of Enhanced European Cooperation in Vocational Education and Training", 2004, p. 4) The aim of this proposal is to provide a critical reading of the EU policy of qualifications frameworks as solutions to the challenges of globalisation. The European Qualifications Framework (EQF) has been a political priority since 2004 where it was mentioned in the Maastricht Communiqué that priority should be given to ‘the development of an open and flexible European qualifications framework, founded on transparency and mutual trust’ (Ibid). In January 2008, a resolution on the EQF was adopted by the Parliament and the Council. In the recommendation, the objectives for the implementation of a Framework were stated as follows: (12) The objective of this Recommendation is to create a common reference framework which should serve as a translation device between different qualifications systems and their levels, whether for general and higher education or for vocational education and training. This will improve the transparency, comparability, and portability of citizens’ qualifications issued in accordance with the practice in the different Member States’ (own emphasis) ("Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning", 2008) Furthermore, it is recommended that the Member States should relate their national qualifications systems to the EQF by 2010, either by referencing existing qualifications systems to the EQF or by developing national qualifications frameworks. By 2012, all national certificates should include a reference to the EQF level at which the qualification belong. From a discursive perspective, there are two interesting claims made in the policy: 1) in the EU policy documents, the EQF is described as a “neutral” tool of “translation”, “bridging” the quite diverse education and training systems in Europe, and 2) an important consideration is to base it on evidence of good practices from other countries. This is clearly stated in the Bordeaux Communiqué: Basing VET policies on reliable evidence supported by rigorous research and data, and improving the statistical systems and data concerning VET ("Bordeaux Communiqué", 2008, p. 10) The aim of this proposal is to look into these two claims by looking into the “evidence” from countries having implemented qualifications frameworks.

Method

The critical reading will be based on a review of existing research and evaluations of national qualifications frameworks in England, Scotland, New Zealand and South Africa. In the article, I shall look into the issues of “transparency”, “comparability” and “portability”, three policy goals which run across the countries and which are central to the EU justification of implementing national qualifications frameworks and a European Qualification Framework. In a sense, I – naively - take the discourse for granted and try to establish the basis for its claims of being a “neutral evidence-based policy tool”.

Expected Outcomes

The construction of a qualifications framework, even a meta-framework like the European, is not a “neutral” action, but a case of intervention in national policies and qualifications systems. Although, the EQF is claimed to be a “descriptive” rather than “prescriptive” qualifications framework, its focus on learning outcomes and decontextualisation of qualifications is a factor of influencing and harmonising qualifications across Europe. The EQF is about furthering European integration through the free mobility of workers and the establishment of a European labour market. Basically, I shall conclude what seems obvious: there is no such thing as a “neutral” policy – policies are to intervene in, modify, change, restrict some kind of social practice, in this case, the practice of education. And as to “evidence”, there is no univocal evidence pointing in the direction of national qualifications frameworks being better fit to meet the challenges of globalisation and increased societal complexity.

References

Allais, S. M. (2003). The National Qualifications Framework in South Africa: a democratic project trapped in a neo-liberal paradigm? Journal of Education and Work, 16(3). Allais, S. M. (2007). Why the South African NQF Failed: lessons for countries wanting to introduce national qualifications frameworks. European Journal of Education, 42(4), 523-547. Bacchi, C. L. (1999). Woman, Policy and Politics: the construction of policy problems. London - Thousand Oaks - New Delhi: SAGE publications. Bjornavold, J. (2007a). EQF and National Qualifications Frameworks. Thessaloniki: Cedefop. Bjornavold, J. e. a. (2007b). Explaining the European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning. In C. o. L. L. Policies (Ed.): Directorate General for Education and Culture, European Commission. Bjørnåvold, J., & Coles, M. (2007/2008). Governing education and training; the case of qualifications frameworks. European Journal of Vocational Training, 42/43(3/1). Bohlinger, S. (2007/2008). Competences as the core element of the European Qualifications Framework. European Journal of Vocational Training, 42/43(3/1), 96-112. Bordeaux Communiqué. (2008). European Union. Bouder, A. (2003). Qualifications in France: towards a national framework? Journal of Education and Work, 16(3), 347-357. Cort, P. (2008). The EC discourse on vocational training - how a “common vocational training policy” turned into a lifelong learning strategy. Vocations and Learning. Hanf, G., & Rein, V. (2007/2008). European and National Qualifications Frameworks - a challenge for vocational education and training in Germany. European Journal of Vocational Training, 42/43(3/1), 113-128. Hozjan, D. (2007/2008). European qualifications framework influences on a national framework: the case of Slovenia. European Journal of Vocational Training, 42/43(3/1), 143-155. Keating, J. (2003). Qualifications Frameworks in Australia. Journal of Education and Work, 16(3), 271-288. Lauzackas, R., & Tütlys, V. (2007/2008). Modelling the national qualifications framework of Lithuania into the European qualifications framework. European Journal of Vocational Training, 40/43(3/1), 167-183. Levin, B. (1998). An Epidemic of Education Policy: (what) can we learn from each other? Comparative education, 34(2), 131-141. Maguire, B., Mernagh, E., & Murray, J. (2007/2008). Aligning learning outcomes descriptors in national and meta-frameworks of qualifications - Learning from Irish experience. European Journal of Vocational Training, 42/43(3/1), 70-83. Maastricht Communiqué on the future priorities of Enhanced European Cooperation in Vocational Education and Training. (2004). Raffe, D., Gallacher, J., & Toman, N. (2007/2008). The Scottish credit and qualifications framework: lessons for the EQF. European Journal of Vocational Training, 42/43(3/1), 59-69. Raffe, D., Howieson, C., & Tinklin, T. (2002). The Scottish educational crisis of 2000: an analysis of the policy process of unification. Journal of Education Policy, 17(2), 167-185. Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning. (2008). (Vol. PE-CONS 3662/07): European Union. Werquin, P. (2007). Moving Mountains: will qualifications systems promote lifelong learning? European Journal of Education, 42(4), 459-484. Wolf, A. (1995). Competence-based Assessment. Bristol: Open University Press. Young, M. (2003). National Qualifications Frameworks as a Global Phenomenon: a comparative perspective. Journal of Education and Work, 16(3), 223-237. Young, M. (2004). An Old Problem in a New Context: rethinking the relationship between sociology and educational policy. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 14(1), 3-20. Young, M. (2007). Qualifications Frameworks: some conceptual issues. European Journal of Education, 42(4), 445-457. Young, M. (2008). Towards a European qualifications framework: some cautionary observations. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(2/3), 127-137.

Author Information

Pia Cort

The Danish School of Education, Aarhus University

Dept. of Curriculum Research

København NV

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER.

Search the ECER Programme

Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
Search for authors and in the respective field.
For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.