Understanding religions in multicultural education

Author(s):

Anna-Leena Riitaoja

Conference:

ECER 2009

Network:

7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education

Format:

Paper

Session Information

07 SES 04 A, Challenges in Responding to Cultural Diversity

Paper Session

Time:

2009-09-28

16:00-17:30

Room:

HG, HS 31

Chair:

Chris Gaine

Contribution

The presentation deals with religions in the context of multicultural education. Religions are essential for shaping identity, and religious understanding is vital for constructing ideologically multicultural society. Religion is also an elemental part of culture, even more essential than ethnicity or gender. It creates a frame of reference, “lenses” to the world. The essence of religions deals with the deepest level of culture: the basic assumptions about life and existence. Religious worldviews are not, in essence, similar with each other or with e.g. secular humanistic worldview – although there are some similarities. Despite the need religions and religious education have not been widely discussed in the context of multicultural / intercultural education neither in US nor Europe or Finland. The importance of religions has not understood well enough compared to gender, ethnicity or class. When considered, religions have been approached mainly through external elements, whenever the essence of religion has not discussed. Or, religions have been discussed in negative light trough the problems of fundamentalism. Religious frames of reference (e.g. world religions) are useful for multicultural education, because they decrease the risk that education is based on one unrecognized frame of reference only; lenses of secular humanism and liberalism. Knowing the lenses is vital for critical education and for acquiring religious literacy as a part of intercultural competence. An interesting theme in the Finnish (as well as European) educational discussion is emphasizing of tolerance, which is supported by liberal pluralism especially. In the recent years in Finland, there has been announced a tendency to eliminate Christian traditions from schools. However, according to critical pedagogy, there is no neutral education. Therefore, elimination of Christian elements easily leads to unrecognized strengthening of secular humanism and liberalism. Then, “hidden curriculum” of Christian privilege will just change to another one, where the meaning of religions is ignored and eliminated outside of one’s private life. In multicultural education there should be considered how to discuss religions in a way that takes account their own frames of reference. This allows also self-critical examinations of secularism. The starting point of multicultural education would not therefore be in eliminating of religious elements but taking account both religious and non-religious diversity and give students possibilities to understand how the world looks like from religious viewpoints. This does not, however, mean confessional teaching in religions. There has been interest in this kind of discussion both in Finland and internationally.

Method

The discussion on connections of religious education and multicultural education is mainly theoretical.

Expected Outcomes

Theoretical discussion shows the importance of religious education as a part of – but also as starting point of – multicultural or intercultural education.

References

Banks J. A.( 2001). Cultural Diversity and Education: Foundations, Curriculum, and Teaching, Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Berling, J.( 2004). Understanding Other religious Worlds: A Quide for Interreligious Education. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis. Bleszynska, K. M. (2008). Constructing intercultural education. Intercultural education, 19 (6), 537-545. Bokhorst-Heng, Wendy D. (2007). Multiculturalism's narratives in Singapore and Canada: exploring a model for comparative multiculturalism and multicultural education. Journal of Curriculum Studies 39 (6), 629–658. Clack, C. (2006). Unburning the Cross – Lifting the Veil on Christian Privilege and White Supremacy in the United States and Abroad: Building Multicultural Understanding of Religion, Spirituality, Faith and Secularity in Educational and Workplace Settings. In: Hoosain, R. & Salili, F. (eds.) Religion in Multicultural Education. Research in Multicultural Education and International Perspectives. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing, 167–214. Coulby, D. (2008). Intercultural education, religion, knowledge and the limits of postmodernism. Intercultural education, 19 (4), 305-314. Coulby, D. & Zambeta, E. (2008). Intercultural education, religion and modernity. Intercultural education, 19 (4), 239-295. Curry, B. K. & Houser, N. O (2006). Reconsidering Moderate Securalism: Constructing a Language of Possibility for Religion in Public education. In: Hoosain, R. & Salili, F. (eds.) Religion in Multicultural Education. Research in Multicultural Education and International Perspectives. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing, 259–278. Franlin, K. & Brummelen, H. V. (2006). Religious Diversity in Western Canadian Education: Presumptions, Provisions, Practices and Possibilities. In: Hoosain, R. & Salili, F. (eds.) Religion in Multicultural Education. Research in Multicultural Education and International Perspectives. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing, 41-70. Hoosain, R. & Salili, F. (2006). Introduction: Dimensions of Religion in Multicultural Education In: Hoosain, R. & Salili, F. (eds.) Religion in Multicultural Education. Research in Multicultural Education and International Perspectives. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing, 1-8. Kiwan, D. (2008). Citizenship education in England at the cross-roads? Four models of citizenship and their implications for ethnic and religious diversity. Oxford Review of Education, 34, (1) pages 39-58. Papastephanou, M. (2008). Religious education for political thinking and citizenship. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 29 (2), 125-138. Rasanen, R. (2005). Etninen moninaisuus koulujen haasteena [Ethnic diversity as a challenge for schools]. In: Kiilakoski, T., Tomperi, T. & Vuorikoski, M. (eds.) Kenen kasvatus? Kriittinen pedagogiikka ja toisinkasvatuksen mahdollisuus. [Whose education? Critical pedagogy and possibility to another type of education.] Tampere: Vastapaino. 87-111. Subedi, B. Merryfield, M., Bashir-Ali, K. & Gunel, E. (2006). Teachers’ and Students’ Experiences Working with Religious Issues in U.S. Schools. In: Hoosain, R. & Salili, F. (eds.) Religion in Multicultural Education. Research in Multicultural Education and International Perspectives. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing, 215-238. Taylor, E. (1994). A Learning Model for Becoming Interculturally Competent. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 18:3, 389-408. Tisdell, E. J. (2006). Spirituality, Cultural Identity, and Epistemology in Culturally Responsive Teaching in Higher Education. Multicultural Perspectives, 8(3), 19–25. Trompenaars, F. & Hampden-Turner, C. (1997). Riding the waves of culture: understanding cultural diversity in business. London: Nicholas Brealey. 2th edition reprinted. Wilson, H.S. (2006). The Other/Neighbor in World Religions: An Exploration from a Multicultural Education Perspective. In: Hoosain, R. & Salili, F. (eds.) Religion in Multicultural Education. Research in Multicultural Education and International Perspectives. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing, 9-40. Wright A. (2004). Religion, education, and post-modernity. London : RoutledgeFalmer. Zambeta, E. (2008). Religion, modernity and social rights in European education. Intercultural education, 19 (4),297-304.

Author Information

Anna-Leena Riitaoja

Uníversity of Helsinki

Applied Sciences of Education

Lohja

Search the ECER Programme

Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
Search for authors and in the respective field.
For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.