Educational Innovation as Professional Development.

Author(s):

Carlos MarceloMarita Sánchez Paulino Murillo Cristina Mayor

Conference:

ECER 2009

Network:

1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations

Format:

Paper

Session Information

01 SES 01 B, Promoting Professional Development

Paper Session

Time:

2009-09-28

09:15-10:45

Room:

NIG, HS II

Chair:

Vivienne Collinson

Contribution

The teaching profession is a key mediating agency for society as it endeavours to cope with social change and upheaval(Bransford, 2005). But the teaching profession must be trained and equipped so that it will have the capacity to cope with the many changes and challenges which lie ahead. If it is to retain the confidence of society, the teaching profession must adapt a great deal so that it can act in a constructive manner within a fast-changing society(Hargreaves, 2003). The changes and new realities lead the gaze inexorably towards the teachers. Day states that "teachers are potentially the most important asset in the notion of a learning society" (Day, 2001:495). Introducing educational innovations in schools and classrooms is a demanding task (Fullan, 1990; Little, 1999; Miles, 1998). Teachers have to acquire new knowledge and skills they are unlikely to have gained in their own education or in their previous classroom work (Day, 2000; Penlington, 2008; Putnam & Borko, 2000). Researchers have suggested that changes in teaching practices must be complemented by changes at the school level; individual learning must be complemented by organizational learning (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1999; Darling-Hammond & McLaughlin, 1999; Elmore, 2004). But innovation is not a mandate. Innovation occurs in a context, a "breeding ground" that allows people to think and develop the best projects to promote quality learning in students (Fullan, 2008). Educational innovation can be understood as a form of professional development (Adey, 2006; Ingvarson, Meiers, & Beavis, 2005; Muijs, Day, Harris, & Lindsay, 2004; Osborn, 2006). From this point of view this research aims to provide information about the processes of educational innovation being developed in Spanish schools. The present research has been commissioned by the Ministry of Education, Social Policy and Sport of Spain to our research team. The goals that guide us in this investigation are: 1. Analyze, from the standpoint of teachers, as well as external agents of innovation (consultants, inspectors, advisors) conditions that facilitate or hinder the planning, implementation and evaluation of educational innovations. 2. Analyze the characteristics and processes that take place in schools that develop innovative projects in education. 3. Identify and characterize the issues on which educational innovations are developed in Spain 4. Know the impact of projects of educational innovation in students, teachers and schools.

Method

We have used different procedures for collecting information: • Questionnaire: We have designed and implemented two types of questionnaires. The first is aimed at teachers involved in projects of educational innovation, and was answered by 911 projects for educational innovation in Spain. The second questionnaire was sent to school inspectors, advisers, as well as counselors. It was answered by 167 external agents. • Focus groups: We have 36 focus groups. There were 18 focus groups in which teachers from different educational levels involved in the development of innovation projects in their schools. The 18 discussion groups correspond to different regions of Spain. There were also 18 focus groups with external agents to the innovation (consultants, advisors and inspectors). • Case Study: We have developed 8 case studies of projects of educational innovation in different regions in Spain.

Expected Outcomes

Conclusions are: * The attitude of commitment of head teacher and the involvement of teachers is a part of the aspects that guarantee the success of any innovation. * There is a growing interest to integrate the innovation projects in the dynamics of schools. * A good climate in the school promotes the initiation, development and achievement of desired outcomes of the projects being undertaken. * The changes and results are often welcomed. Is generally recognized that the effort made it worthwhile. * Sometimes, participation in institutional projects does not mean more than the institutionalization of an earlier initiative that had been developed in schools. * There is no single source in the initiation of innovations, even within the same institution. * There is no single source in the initiation of innovations, even within the same institution.

References

Adey, P. (2006). A model for the professional development of teachers of thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 49-56. Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L.Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 1-39). (Jossey Bass. ed.). S. Francisco. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of Knowledge and Practice: Teacher Learning in Communities. In A. I.-N. a. P. D. Pearson (Ed.), (Vol. Review of Research in Education, pp. 249-305). Washington: American Educational Research Association. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. (1999). Investing in Teaching as a Learning Profession. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), (Vol. Teaching as a Learning Professional. Handbook of Policy and Practice., pp. 376-411). S. Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Day, C. (2000). Teachers in the Twenty-first Century: time to renew the vision. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6(1), 101-115. Elmore, R. F. (2004). Building a New Structure for School Leadership. In R. Elmore (Ed.), School Reform from the Inside Out (pp. 41-88). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Fullan, M. (1990). Staff Development Innovation and Institutional Development. In B. Joyce (Ed.), School Culture Through Staff Development (pp. 3-25). Virginia: ASCD. Fullan, M. (2008). The Six Secrets of Change: What the Best Leaders Do to Help Their Organizations Survive and Thrive. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the Knowledge Society. Education in the Age of Insecurity. New York: Teacher College Press. Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the Impact of Professional Development Programs on Teachers' knowledge, Practice, Student Outcomes & Efficacy. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10). Little, J. W. (1999). Organizing Schools for Teacher Learning. In L. D.-H. a. G. Sykes (Ed.), (Vol. Teaching as a Learning Professional. Handbook of Policy and Practice, pp. 233-261). S. Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Miles, M. (1998). Finding Key to School Change. A 40-Year Odyssey. In A. e. a. Hargreaves (Ed.), International Handbook of Educational Change (pp. 37-69). London: Kluwer. Muijs, D., Day, C., Harris, A., & Lindsay, G. (2004). Evaluating CPD: an overview. In C. Day (Ed.), International Handbook on the Continuing Professional Development of teachers (pp. 291-319). Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education. Osborn, M. (2006). Changing the context of teachers' work and professional development: A European perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(4-5), 242-253. Penlington, C. (2008). Dialogue as a catalyst for teacher change: A conceptual analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1304-1316. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.

Author Information

Carlos Marcelo

University of Seville

Didactica

Sevilla

Marita Sánchez

University of Seville, Spain

Paulino Murillo

University of Seville, Spain

Cristina Mayor

University of Seville, Spain

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER.

Search the ECER Programme

Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
Search for authors and in the respective field.
For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.

Session Information

Contribution

Method

Expected Outcomes

References

Author Information

Update Modus of this Database

Search the ECER Programme

Navigation

Info for