Session Information
32 SES 06, Transition of Organizations (Ethics, Emotions and Fun)
Paper Session
Contribution
This study explores teachers' perceptions of critical ethical incidents experienced by themselves, in order to discover the reasons teachers give for their uncertainty about how to respond to critical ethical incidents.
The goals of this study are to:
(a) Investigate the degree to which teachers are aware of official policies in regards to critical ethical incidents, including laws, procedures, or management circulars.
(b) Find out whether the level of awareness of the official educational policy affects the teacher's ethical decision-making.
Theoretical background
The official policy: ethical guidelines in education
In order to help teachers in their ethical decision-making, different countries (e.g., the US, Canada, New Zealand) have formulated official policies, which include management circulars and procedures regulating sensitive educational situations. However, the numerous instructions found in these documents are mostly unrelated to ethics. Despite the law’s treatment of topics such as 'human dignity,' 'right to freedom' and 'confidentiality,' teachers still find it difficult to relate these general sections to specific critical incidents in practice.
Our study of Israeli ethical guidelines for teachers may be influenced by examples of ethical codes from countries all over the world, such as the USA, New Zealand, the Philippines, Germany, and England. In Israel there is a draft of a general code of ethics dating from 1995 (Executive Committee of the Association of Israeli Teachers, 2002). However, most Israeli teachers do not even know it exists, and around the world, we may find ethical codes for teachers that have been written by various educational institutions, usually by functionaries in high-level positions in teachers unions, and a few by education ministries. However, even in places where there are formal ethical codes, most teachers are unaware of their existence. In a few cases, even teachers familiar with their country's code of ethics written by teachers' unions and the ministry of education find that it does not always prescribe or proscribe particular behaviors (O'Neill and Bourke 2010).
We may explain this phenomenon by the fact that because codes of ethics are usually developed by high level functionaries in teachers' unions or education ministries, without the participation of enough ‘regular’ teachers in the field, they are perceived as irrelevant by teachers and consequently remain unimplemented (Slattery & Rapp 2003).
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Author (2013). Executive Committee of the Association of Israeli Teachers (2002). Code of Ethic for Israeli Teachers – A Draft. Executive Committee of the Association of Israeli Teachers. Jerusalem (In Hebrew). O'Neill, J., & Bourke, R. (2010). Educating teachers about a code of ethical conduct. Ethics and Education, 5(2), 159-172. Slattery, P., & Rapp, D. (2003). Ethics and the foundations of education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.