Main Content
Session Information
02 SES 12 B, Transition in Education and Research: Skills Development
Paper Session
Contribution
Transitions from school into apprenticeship or field of studies constitute a fundamental task in adolescence. Most of the theories of career choice can be classified as either sociological or psychological approaches. Gottfredson’s theory (1981) in contrast integrates sociological as well as psychological aspects. From a developmental perspective she assumes that occupational choice is a long-term process that already begins (even if partly unconscious) in early childhood by developing a subjective field of occupational aspirations. In order to evaluate occupational alternatives she refers to three major aspects: correspondence of sextype and prestige level (as essential aspects of the social self) and interests (as essential aspects of the psychological self). In first instance Gottfredson assumes that this subjective zone of acceptable alternatives (the so called social space) is defined on the one hand by a tolerable sextype-boundary and on the other hand by tolerable prestige-boundaries. The latter are influenced by a) the assessment of the effort required to achieve a vocational goal and refer to self-efficacy beliefs (upper prestige-boundary) as well as b) the expected level of social support (lower prestige-boundary) (Gottfredson & Lapan 1997). Next, within the set boundaries, adolescents search for occupations best fitting their interests. With respect to the theoretical approach that defining occupational aspirations is an elimination process, she assumes that the social space needs to be small-sized at higher stages of cognitive age.
Although the general hypotheses concerning a restricted subjective zone of the social space with increasing cognitive age have already been confirmed (Ratschinski 2009), most empirical approaches to test Gottfredson’s assumption of circumscription focus on few occupational preferences. However, with regress to Gottfredson, this procedure can only be considered as pointing out the central core of social space (cf. Gottfredson 1996, p. 205). Furthermore, there still exists a lack of information related to the position and boundaries of the field.
Thus, this study aims to test the theoretical assumptions on the basis of a wider scope of occupational alternatives. Moreover, there is little known about further psychological aspects that might have an influence on the structure of occupational aspirations. Especially with regard to vocational interests, seen as personality-facets (Holland 1997) and orientations of the individual to handle decision-making processes in concern of satisfying personal needs (Todt 1995), the study examines the meaning of attachment representations as an indirect determinant of occupational aspirations. Previous findings indicate that career development is influenced by attachment under effects of career exploration (e.g. Blustein, Walbridge, Friedlander & Palladino 1991), career indecision and self-efficacy beliefs (e.g. Tokar, Withrow, Hall & Moradi 2003). Thus, it is hypothesized that attachment representations directly influence career exploration and vocational identity formation, which in turn may affect the field of occupational aspirations and the clearness of vocational interests.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Blustein, D. L., Walbridge, M. M., Friedlander, M. L. & Palladino, D. E. (1991). Contributions of psychological seperation and parental attachment to the career development process. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 39-50. Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology Monograph, 28(6), 545-579. Gottfredson, L. S. (1996). Gottfredson's theory of circumscription and compromise. In Duane Brown & Linda Brooks (Ed.), Career choice and development (pp. 179-232). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Gottfredson, L. S. & Lapan, R. T. (1997). Assessing gender-based circumscription of occupational aspirations. Journal of Career Assessment, 5(4), 419-441. Grau, I. (1999). Skalen zur Erfassung von Bindungsrepräsentationen in Paarbeziehungen. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 20(2), 142-152. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments, 3rd edition. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources. Joerin Fux, S. (2005). Persönlichkeit und Berufstätigkeit. Theorie und Instrumente von John Holland im deutschsprachigen Raum, unter Adaption und Weiterentwicklung von Self-directed Search (SDS) und Position Classification Inventory (PCI). Göttingen: Cuvillier. Kracke, B. (1997). Parental behaviors and adolescents' career exploration. The Career Development Quarterly, 45, 341-350. Lapan, R. T. & Jingeleski, J. (1992). Circumscribing vocational aspirations in junior high school. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(1), 81-90. Leung, S. A. & Harmon, L. W. (1990). Individual and sex differencesin the zone of acceptable alternatives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37(2), 153-159. Ratschinski, G. (2009). Selbstkonzept und Berufswahl. Eine Überprüfung der Berufswahltheorie von Gottfredson an Sekundarschülern. Münster: Waxmann. Todt, E. (1995). Entwicklung des Interesses. In Hildegard Hetzer, Eberhard Todt, Inge Seiffge-Krenke & Roland Arbinger (Ed.), Angewandte Entwicklungspsychologie des Kindes- und Jugendalters (pp. 213-264). Heidelberg: Quelle und Meyer. Tokar, D. M., Withrow, J. R., Hall, R. J. & Moradi, B. (2003). Psychological separation, attachment security, vocational self-concept crystallization, and career indecision: A structural equation Analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(1), 3-19.
Programme by Networks, ECER 2021
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
Network 28. Sociologies of Education
Network 29. Reserach on Arts Education
Network 30. Research on Environmental und Sustainability Education
Network 31. Research on Language and Education (LEd)
Network 32. Organizational Education
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
Marginal Content
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.