Vocational Education and Workplace Affordances: A Study of Vocational Learning in Workplace Contexts
Author(s):
Magnus Fjellström (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

02 SES 08 B, Transitions: Teachers' Learning at Work

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-10
09:00-10:30
Room:
324. [Main]
Chair:
Vibe Aarkrog
Discussant:
Lars Heinemann

Contribution

This study is a part of a larger study that explores affordances for vocational learning in school and workplace contexts i.e. in a construction programme in a Swedish upper secondary school and apprenticeship education in work life. As, Jonasson (2014) argues, these two educational contexts represent the education field that constitutes vocational education. Learning in these contexts are important to understand in order to develop knowledge on affordances for vocational learning that are shaped within these different learning contexts. Consequently, both vocational learning in school and at work are central to develop vocational skills for work life contexts (Aarkrog, 2005; Tanggaard, 2007). Thus, Akkerman and Bakker (2012) argues that vocational learning processes in school can be difficult to transfer into workplace contexts. On the other hand, Rosvall (2012) emphasizes that it is important that the knowledge developed in a school environment can be transferred into work life contexts. Since learning in a school environment can be questioned on the basis of transferability to work life contexts, it is important to increase the understanding of conditions for learning in the different learning contexts. Research that handle issues about affordances for developing vocational competencies in school-based VET programmes and workplaces are needed in order to further understand how educational contexts affects possible development of vocational competences. Specifically, this paper intends to highlight apprentices’ experiences and reflections on affordances for learning in production oriented workplace contexts.

The theoretical concept used in this paper draws on aspects of Stephen Billett’s idea of a ‘workplace curriculum’ which includes how participants learn in social practices through engagement and participation in workplace contexts (Billett, 2006). Learning and working can be seen as interdependent (Billett, 2001). The apprentices in this study thus develop vocational competences through work by interacting in a social environment (i.e. in a construction site) that provides opportunities for learning affordances. Thus, learning in workplaces and the enactment of a workplace curriculum are likely to be shaped within: “(a) the kinds of activities that individuals engage in; (b) their access to the contribution of situational factors, including support and guidance; and (c) how individuals engage, interact and interpretatively construct knowledge from these situations” (Billett, 2006, p. 21). In this study, the starting point is that personal interests and workplace affordances shapes the apprentices possibilities to develop vocational competences.

The aim of this study is to explore how affordances for vocational learning are shaped within apprentices’ education after graduating a VET programme comprising the construction programme. In this paper are following questions addressed: i) How can vocational competencies be developed within workplace contexts? ii) What forms of learning can be developed in workplace contexts? and iii) How do workplace contexts provide affordances to develop vocational competencies?

Method

Semi-structured interviews have been conducted with 11 apprentices that all have participated in a project-based vocational education (PBVET) and graduated from a construction programme in a Swedish upper secondary school in 2013 (Fjellström, 2014b). The apprentices that are in focus in this study comprises former vocational students in upper secondary school that conducts their remaining apprentices’ time at a construction site. The interviews where formed and designed to capture the apprentices experiences on their learning in their specific workplace following Kvale and Brinkmann’s (2014) idea of how to conduct interviews. Thus, the apprentices are all working (i.e. being educated) in different workplaces, data has been structured to capture their thoughts and experiences so they could be comparable. Initially the interviews have been categorised and structured according to Kvale and Brinkmann’s ideas of categorising data from interviewes into managebal areas. These categories were; competences in workplace, engaging tasks, expectations on their apprenticeship education and learning affordances in the workplace. The theoretical concept of a workplace curriculum has been used to analyse the interviews in order to understand how affordances for learning can be shaped and understood in workplaces through an apprenticeship employment.

Expected Outcomes

The result indicates that affordances for workplace learning is highly comparable to learning in PBVET (Fjellström, 2014a, 2014b) whereas learning is highly connected to performing tasks. In this study, apprentices follow a supervisor and/or co-worker and adopts their performances in different tasks. High complex tasks (above their skills) are instructed and overviewed by supervisors and co-workers and guided into a correct performance. Therefore, the apprentices’ performance of different tasks often results in positive feedback by performing the task ‘correct’ as a consequence of close supervision from more experienced workers. Other non-problem oriented tasks were referred as not developing competences due to its low complexity. So, high complex tasks increase the apprentices’ eager to perform task that develop vocational competences. The apprentices are also assigned tasks that follows the phase of the production which the apprentices highly appreciates because they express that understanding the building process is a key competence that only can be developed by being a part of that process. This corresponds to Billett’s (2006) idea of a workplace curriculum which consists of understanding workplace goals. Further, the findings indicates that workplace contexts provide options for apprentices to, on their own or in interaction with others, find own solutions to perform tasks. This result also corresponds to the developed model of affordances in the learning environment that is presented in Fjellström (2014b), that suggests that the freedom of choosing method can result in developing a higher, productive learning. So, vocational competencies are developed within interaction with more experienced workers and from the ability to make own solutions and problem solving activities to complete tasks. This paper has highlighted affordances for vocational learning in production oriented workplaces that involves apprentices’ interaction and development of vocational competences from workplace contexts comprising both high complex tasks and informal- and formal guidance.

References

Aarkrog, V. (2005). Learning in the Workplace and the Significance of School-Based Education: A Study of Learning in a Danish Vocational Education and Training Programme. [Reports - Evaluative]. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 24(2), 137-147. Akkerman, S. F., and Bakker, A. (2012). Crossing boundaries between school and work during apprenticeships. Vocations and Learning, 5(2), 153-173. Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace : strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest, N.S.W.: Allen & Unwin. Billett, S. (2006). Constituting the Workplace Curriculum. [Opinion Papers]. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 31-48. Fjellström, M. (2014a). Project-based vocational education and training: opportunities for teacher guidance in a Swedish upper secondary school. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 1-16. doi: 10.1080/13636820.2014.983957 Fjellström, M. (2014b). Vocational education in practice: a study of work-based learning in a construction programme at a Swedish upper secondary school. Empirical resesarch in Vocational Education & training, 2014 6:2. Jonasson, C. (2014). Defining boundaries between school and work: teachers and students’attribution of quality to school-based vocational training. Journal of Education and Work, 27(5), 544-563. doi: 10.1080/13639080.2013.787483 Kvale, S., and Brinkmann, S. (2014). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun (3. [rev.] uppl. ed.). Lund: Studentlitteratur. Rosvall, P.-Å. (2012). Yrkesutbildning i förändring? Konsekvenser för undervisningen. I I. Henning Loeb and H. Korp (Eds.), Lärare och lärande i yrkesprogram och introduktionsprogram (1. uppl. ed., pp. 232 s.). Lund: Studentlitteratur. Tanggaard, L. (2007). Learning at trade vocational school and learning at work: boundary crossing in apprentices’ everyday life. Journal of Education and Work, 20(5), 453-466.

Author Information

Magnus Fjellström (presenting / submitting)
Umeå university
Department of Education
Umeå SE

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.