Transition of Education and Lifelong Learning through Social Innovation
Author(s):
Antonius Schroeder (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

23 SES 08 B, Adult Education Policies and Practices

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-10
09:00-10:30
Room:
418.Oktatóterem [C]
Chair:
Anne Larson

Contribution

The transition from an industrial to a knowledge-based society and the increasing need for a short-time adjustment of knowledge, competences and self-management skills is challenging education and lifelong learning structures - from the early-childhood to the retirement phase. Education has to give responsive and structural answers to these challenges. In the debate on the most promising approaches for the modernisation of education and the development of lifelong learning structures, the social innovation concept is becoming more and more prominent.

The continuous improvement of education is the key challenge for European societies and the global world. Education and training, or from a European perspective better summarised under the more comprehensive Lifelong Learning (LLL) strategy, “have a fundamental role to play in achieving the Europe 2020 objectives” (European Council 2011) as well as to deliver competences to manage social change. Educational strategies do not only focus on the knowledge society to foster European competiveness, but also on the reduction of poverty and the improvement of social inclusion. This might be the case also from a global perspective, especially education in developing countries, focusing on social innovation on access to education, inequality, education and women, alphabetisation and others.

Both in Europe and globally, the concept of social innovation is becoming increasingly evident in policy, scientific and public debates. We define social innovation as a new combination or figuration of practices in areas of social action, prompted by certain actors or constellations of actors with the goal of better coping with needs and problems than is possible by using existing practices. An innovation is therefore social to the extent that it varies social action, and is socially accepted and diffused in society (cf. Howaldt/Butzin/Domanski/Kaletka 2014).

There is a growing consensus among practitioners, policy makers, the research community and others that widespread social innovation is required to cope with the significant challenges that societies are facing now and in the future, and education is one of the main and fundamental global and European challenges. The EU funded project SI-DRIVE (www.si-drive.eu) will contribute to a comprehensive understanding of how social innovations occur and under which conditions they lead to social change. One of the key objectives is to determine the nature, characteristics and impacts of social innovation as key elements of a new paradigm of innovation and to identify success factors and also drivers and barriers of social innovations in seven policy areas, including education.

Analysing the relation between social innovation and social change, the main focus of the policy field education is on research on social innovation processes for the implementation of new educational structures within the European concept of improving Lifelong Learning. From a perspective of global comparison different priorities might be set in other global areas, but all in all improving education has to be seen as the ground to overcome economic and social changes, and to assure social cohesion and economic growth.

The main research questions are

-   What is the context of social innovation in education and lifelong learning?

-   What is the structure of actor-networks in concrete social innovation processes of education?

-   What is the relation between European and national education and lifelong learning policies on the one hand and regional-local implementation on the other hand, including support and policy structures?

-   In how far do social innovations in education and lifelong learning having already up-scaled impact on systemic change?

-   What are social innovation prototypes and clusters of education and lifelong learning within different European regions?

-   What are important coordination models and platforms for education and lifelong learning?

Method

The SI-DRIVE project looks at theoretical concepts, empirical research and observable trends of social innovation. It refers to socio-scientific innovation research and its contribution to the development and spread of an advanced and more comprehensive notion of social innovation. Based on the preliminary theoretical framework of SI-DRIVE (Theoretical Approaches to Social Innovation) global and European mapping of about 1000+ actual social innovation cases from all over the world will be done. This mapping will lead to prototypes and typologies of social innovations, and more concretely in the field of education and lifelong learning as one of the project’s seven policy fields. Mapping the “world of social innovation” will combine regional perspectives with the policy fields and related cross-cutting themes (like gender, migration, demographic change, information and communication technologies) and cultural, religious and ethical backgrounds. The database will feature a criteria-based assessment system that allows to qualitatively describe the main dimensions of the mapped social innovations as well as to assign quantitative scores to these dimensions. The focus in the policy field education, in close connection to the overarching research questions of SI-DRIVE, will be to analyse the educational policy environment in order to find out what and who drives social innovation in the field of education, which stakeholders are doing what and how far educational policies can be barriers or facilitators to innovation. On the basis of theoretical progress, empirical case studies and European and global comparison as well as policy analyses, SI-DRIVE will identify how “management of change” can work in the field of education. It will especially work on those topics which represent educational upheavals in the past and present: Endeavours to overcome education related sectoral borders and constraints, the development of comprehensive learning approaches and target-oriented systemic change in education (fostering employability and flexicurity in changing labour market needs or promoting active citizenship including cultural, social and political participation).

Expected Outcomes

SI-DRIVE contributes to a deeper understanding of social innovations. New definitions of social innovations and new theoretical frameworks for understanding social innovations will be developed. Using the empirical knowledge in education and lifelong learning, which we will generate through mapping and case studies, will help to understand the role of social innovations for transformative changes in education (policy and practices). As the first empirical phase of SI-DRIVE, a world-wide mapping of more than 1.000 social innovation cases, is currently running and will be finalized in June 2015, we will be able to provide first concrete results from this massive empirical exercise at the ECER 2015 conference. The expected outcomes include is a better understanding of social innovations in the field of education and lifelong learning, their process dynamics, drivers and barriers. They also include a differentiated heuristics of different actors’ roles and functions (policy, different education areas, stakeholders of related policy fields like employment and economy, learners, pupils and parents, teachers, learning in the workplace etc.) within social innovation. We want to introduce our empirical findings on the background of our theoretical framework to the education research community with the aim to discuss relevant findings and outcomes, stressing the focus on the importance of social innovations for transformative educational approaches. One main aspect will be to learn from European and non-European countries in regard to pioneer models of social innovations to increase access and participation to formal non-formal and informal education globally. Social innovations in specific practice fields (combining different social innovation projects and initiatives) will be analysed on their contributions to solve societal challenges (skills shortages, improvement of participation in education and lifelong learning, equal opportunities, modernizing the different education areas, social and digital inclusion, etc.).

References

Howaldt, J. & Schwarz, M. (2010). Social Innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. IMO international monitoring. Aachen. Retrieved from http://www.sfs.tu-dortmund.de/odb/Repository/Publication/Doc/1289/IMO_Trendstudie_Howaldt_Schwarz_englische_Version.pdf Franz, H.-W., Hochgerner, J., & Howaldt, J. (2012). Challenge social innovation. Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society. Berlin, New York: Springer. Howaldt, J., Kopp, R., & Schwarz, M. (2013). Social innovations as drivers of social change – Tarde's disregarded contribution to social innovation theory building. Retrieved from http://de.scribd.com/doc/191799115/Social-innovations-as-drivers-of-social-change-%E2%80%93-Tarde%E2%80%99s-disregarded-contribution-to-social-innovation-theory-building European Commission. (2013). Social Innovation Research in the European Union. Approaches, findings and future directions. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/social_innovation.pdf Howaldt, J., Butzin, A., Domanski, D., & Kaletka, C. (2014). Theoretical Approaches to Social Innovation - A Critical Literature Review. A deliverable of the project: ‘Social Innovation: Driving Force of Social Change’ (SI-DRIVE). Dortmund: Sozialforschungsstelle. Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). The International Handbook on Social innovation. Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Elgar. Tarde, G. (1903). The law of imitation. New York: Henry Holt and Company. Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The Open Book of Social Innovation. London: Nesta. Schröder, A. (2012). Implementing Innovative Structures to Improve Lifelong Learning - A Social Innovation Process. The Example HESSENCAMPUS CSI Discussion Paper, Nr. 28, Vienna: Centre for Social Innovation (self-publishing). Howaldt, J., Butzin, A., Domanski, D., & Kaletka, C. (2014). Theoretical Approaches to Social Innovation - A Critical Literature Review. A deliverable of the project: ‘Social Innovation: Driving Force of Social Change’ (SI-DRIVE). Dortmund: TU Dortmund, Sozialforschungsstelle. LLL2010 (2011). Final Integrated Report: Towards lifelong learning society in Europe: The contribution of the education system. Working Paper 77. Project Report 6.

Author Information

Antonius Schroeder (presenting / submitting)
TU Dortmund
Sozialforschungsstelle - sfs
Dortmund

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.