Session Information
26 SES 08 A, Feedback and Coaching
Paper Session
Contribution
This paper addresses the methodological issues arising in the process of translating CALL - an online based survey- and feedback system on leadership for learning - from an American to a Danish educational context. The paper pursues the argument that the process of translation is not solely a linguistic exercise. It also implies methodological and conceptual questions related to the translation and as such transformation of general and theoretical research based models of leadership for learning into recognizable features of specific leadership practices in shifting contexts. The paper specifies thiissue by analysing empirical data material relating to the process of translating and validating the survey through the method of cognitive validity testing (Blitz et al. 2013). In the this analysis we use an analytical framework built on a conceptualisation of translation as both a textual and a organisational matter (Røvik 2007; Obed Madsen 2013)
The Comprehensive Assessment of Leadership for Learning (CALL) aims at assessing, but also informing the development of leadership practices across the school promoting student learning and equity (Kelley and Halverson 2012). CALL draws on a research based theoretical model of leadership for learning comprising five core domains: 1) focus on learning; 2) monitoring teaching and learning; 3) building nested learning communities; 4) acquiring and allocating resources; 5) maintaining a safe an effective learning environment (Halverson and Dikker 2011). Furthermore CALL is based on a concept of distributed leadership and focuses on leadership practices or tasks. The methodological argument is that CALL is not an assessment of individual principals. Rather, it is a formative assessment of actual leadership practices as these may be distributed across the school and across formal and informal leadership positions (Blitz et al 2014; 359).
The underlying conceptualization of leadership for learning resonates with a wider the research field of leadership for learning. As such the CALL-model is similar to the model of student-centered leadership (Robinson 2011) and it reflects a shift towards and 'integrated perspective' on leadership for learning across the field (Leithwood and Louis 2012; Robertson & Timperley 2011; Robinson et al 2008; 2009; Bjerg & Staunæs 2014).
Futhermore the educational system in Denmark is currently marked by major educational reforms. The overall aim is to increase the learning outcomes of all students. This implies an increased demand for educational leadership practices which have proven efficient in enhancing student learning. As such the actual context is very apt for translating and implementing CALL-DK as a tool for the assessment as well as the development of educational leadership practices.
We are currently in the midst of translating CALL. This translation is being carried out in close cooperation with Professor Carolyn Kelley and the research team behind CALL, based at the School of Education, University of Madison Wisconsin.
In our analysis of the process of translation our main argument is that a translation of CALL into CALL-DK needs to reflect not only the need for a linguistic translation of the survey and survey items from English to Danish, but also to look into how the leadership practices implied in the underlying leadership model may or may not be recognized within a Danish context. Though it is not just a matter of adjusting the leadership model to reflect actual leadership practices in Denmark more accurately, because CALL is also designed to be formative. Therefore CALL should not only reflect practices as they currently are, but also be directive as to how leadership practices should develop - according to the underlying model. As such the distance between actual practices and CALL is part and parcel of the formative ambition of developing leadership for learning.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Bjerg, H. & Staunæs, D. (2014): Læringscentreret skoleledelse. Tænketeknologier til forskningsinformeret skoleledelse. Frederikshavn: Dafolo Blitz, M. H.; Salisbury, J.; Kelley, C. (2014): The role of cognitive validity testing in the development of CALL, the comprehensive assessment of leadership for learning. In: Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 52/3, 358-378 Halverson, R. & Dikker, S. (2011) Comprehensive Assessment of Leadership for Learning (CALL): Development and Design of an Online, Formative Assessment and Feedback System for Middle and High School Leadership. Annual Conference of the American Education Research Association. New Orleans, LA. April 2011. Kelly, C. & Halverson, R. (2012): "The Comprehensive Assessment of Leadership for Learning: A Next Generation Formative Evaluation and Feedback System". I Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 3 (2), 1- 14 Leithwood, K. & Louis, L.S. (2012): Linking Leadership to Student Learning. Jossey Bass. Madsen, S. Obed. (2013): Lederen som oversætter. Et oversættelsesteoretisk perspektiv på strategisk arbejde [The Leader as Translator]. PhD-dissertation. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Robinson, V. (2011): Student-Centered Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Robinson, V.; Hohepa, M. & Lloyd, C. (2009): School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES] Wellington: Ministry of Education, Wellington, New Zealand. Robinson, V.; Lloyd, C. & Rowve, K.J. (2008): "The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership type". In: Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635 - 674 Robertson, J. & Timperley, H. (Eds.) (2011): Leadership and Learning. SAGE Røvik, K. A. (2007): Trender og translasjoner. Ideer som former det 21. århundrets organisasjon. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.