How and what are children learning about economics? A comparative case study with two primary schools
Author(s):
Tim Jay (presenting / submitting) Ulises Xolocotzin
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

14 SES 01 B, Home-school-community Links: Learning Mathematics, Economics and Family Business

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-23
13:15-14:45
Room:
OB-Theatre B
Chair:
Linda Mary Hargreaves

Contribution

This paper reports a study of children's out-of-school learning in the context of economic activity. The study drew on theory from the economic psychology literature, from the mathematics education research literature, and from research on out-of-school learning.

The majority of research on the development of children’s economic thinking has focused on understanding the ways in which children’s activity and thinking comes to resemble that of adults (Gudmunson & Danes, 2011). However, researchers have also identified a need to study of children’s economic development and socialization in its own right, independently of adult involvement (Webley & Lea, 1993). Although it is relatively challenging to carry out, such research has started to reveal the extent to which children construct their own understanding of economics through independent activity. This study aimed to increase understanding of children’s economic socialization by carrying out an in-depth qualitative study of 9-10 year-old children’s out-of-school economic activity in two schools in a city in the south-west of England.

Research on children’s economic socialization also has interesting potential links with mathematics and STEM education research, and with research that has explored boundaries between formal and informal learning (e.g. Bevan et al., 2012). Previous research has shown than a good deal of informal mathematics and science learning takes place in the context of everyday economic activity, but that this is often not captalised on by teachers. Children often find it difficult to make links between their out-of-school lives and learning, and their classroom learning (Hughes & Pollard, 2006), while teachers are often unaware of the informal learning that could potentially function as a resource for formal mathematics and science learning. Some researchers argue that for this reason, research and understanding of out-of-school learning represents an important equity issue (Bell, 2012).   

The study reported here was designed to address a number of interconnected research questions:

What activities are 9-10 year-old children engaged with out-of-school that contribute to economic socialization and informal mathematics learning? Answers to this will contribute to our knowledge and understanding of the ways in which children develop economic understanding. They will also help us to build knowledge of the informal mathematics learning that children bring to school that teachers can build on during formal mathematics lessons.

What links do children make between their informal, out-of-school, learning, and the learning that they engage with in the classroom? The research literature shows that children often find it difficult to make links between the mathematics classroom and their everyday lives. We are interested in finding out whether this process can be facilitated by building a richer picture of children’s out-of-school activity before encouraging them to make such links.

Is there evidence for differences in the kinds of out-of-school activities, and informal learning, that children from different schools are experiencing? We are interested in the diversity of experiences and activities that children are engaging with outside of school. If there are differences between schools in the kinds of activities, thinking, and learning that children experience, then these are likely to have implications for teaching and learning in schools.   

Method

The work presented in this paper took the form of a comparative case study, set in two contrasting schools in a city in south-west England; one in a relatively deprived area of the city, and another from a more affluent area. Approximately 30 children in each school participated in the project; children were in Year 5 of primary school, between 9 and 10 years old. A series of data collection methods were employed over a period of 5 weeks, allowing us to gradually build up an understanding of children’s out-of-school economic activity and learning. In each school, the study began with a classroom session where children learned about the term ‘economic activity’, and discussed the kinds of things that this term could refer to. We encouraged a very broad definition, encompassing activities involving money, alongside non-monetary activities including collecting, swapping, trading, borrowing, lending and game-playing. Following this session, we asked children to complete a structured diary for five days, including a weekend, recording their participation in various forms of economic activity. At the same time, we asked parents to complete a short questionnaire about their children's out-of-school activity and mathematics learning. The next stage of the study involved children taking home a digital camera and a set of prompt cards, in order to document one or two economic activities in which they engaged outside of school. They were given one week, including a weekend, to do this. The documents produced by children during this exercise not only represented useful data in themselves, but were used as props to support focus group discussions with 3-4 children at a time. These focus groups involved discussion of the activities that children had documented, together with some exploration of how those activities worked for children, and what thinking and learning was involved. Analysis of the data is currently ongoing, and is being carried out at three levels. We are analyzing the activities that children reported, analyzing ways in which children made links between out-of-school and classroom learning, and finally analyzing differences between schools.

Expected Outcomes

Children are engaged in a wide variety of economic activities, which might contribute to the development of economic understanding and to informal mathematics learning. These include some activities that are supported to some degree by parents and other adults, such as forms of entrepreneurship, investment and informal work. Also included are activities with which children engage individually or in peer groups, such as buying, playing with, and exchanging trading cards, organizing days out, and various forms of spending and saving. In both schools, children reported a mix of activities involving parents, and activities engaged with individually or in a peer group that parents were often unaware of. All children struggled to make explicit links between their out-of-school activity and their classroom learning. While children could talk in great detail about the complex thinking and learning that they do outside of school, they needed a lot of support to see links with their classroom mathematics. Within the school in the more affluent part of the city, there was greater diversity in the range of activities that children reported. This could partly be due to the fact that in the school in the more deprived part of the city, there was much greater representation of money in children’s documents and in their talk. Children in the more deprived area talked much more about the amount of money that they had to spend, and how they decided how to spend it – often with a peer group. This has resonance with Walkerdine (1990) who found that working-class family conversations around mathematics often involved ‘material’ or ‘concrete’ situations, whereas middle-class conversations would be more likely to involve ‘imaginary’ and ‘abstract’ problems. We have seen a similar difference between the kinds of economic activities that children report engaging in within peer groups and individually.

References

Bevan, B., Bell, P., Stevens, R., & Razfar, A. (Eds.) (2012). LOST opportunities: Learning in out-of-school time. Netherlands: Springer. Bell, P. (2012). Introduction: Understanding How and Why People Learn Across Settings as an Educational Equity Strategy. In LOST Opportunities (pp. 95-98) Gudmunson, C., & Danes, S. (2011). Family Financial Socialization: Theory and Critical Review. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 32(4), 644-667. Hughes, M., & Pollard, A. (2006). Home–school knowledge exchange in context. Educational Review, 58(4), 385-395. Walkerdine, V. (1990). Difference, cognition, and mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics 10(3), 51-56. Webley, P., & Lea, S. (1993). Towards a more realistic psychology of economic socialization. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14(3), 461-472.

Author Information

Tim Jay (presenting / submitting)
Sheffield Hallam University, United Kingdom
Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.