Session Information
19 SES 06, Minorities Making Space: Language and Inclusion
Paper Session
Contribution
This article suggests following the inductive discovery of educational processes affiliated with language and its correct usage ("verbal hygiene ") that take place in lessons in a low socio-economic class high school (and do not take place in lessons in a high socio-economic class high school) in Israel, which operate as a practice of microaggression.
This broad objective encompasses three specific research questions:
1) What characterizes the “incorrect language” (what is also called by the teachers, “They have their own language”) of the students from the low socio-economic class?
2) How does the intense preoccupation of the teachers in correcting the language of the students act as a unique practice of microaggression (and everyday racism)?
3) How do the language corrections create a specific educational experience among the students from the low socio-economic class that in turn reproduces the ethno-class social stratification?
Theoretical Framework
The main theoretical framework of this article is the study of microaggressions. Microaggressions have been defined as “brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial slights and insults to the target person or group” (Sue et al. 2007, 273). Prominent examples of microaggression are sentences such as, “I don’t see color,” and “You’re different from the others.” Other examples are the mispronouncing of the first and last names of Hispanic and African American students (Kohli and Solórzano 2012), being ignored or being given slow service (Sue et al. 2007).
Since microaggression is an expression of everyday racism, this article also utilizes anthropological and sociological studies of education that report the manner in which schools across the globe relate to issues of ethnicity, race, and racism. One of the comprehensive findings in this regard illustrates the preference of teachers and principals to dissociate themselves from open preoccupation with the matter (Pollock 2004). This dissociation is portrayed as being accompanied by practices of silence and silencing or other practices that highlight the school’s neutrality with regard to racism.
Since this article deals in language and education, I will also use the widespread findings in this field. Many findings cite how the language of students from “marked” groups (in terms of ethnicity, race, and poverty) is chronicled as "lacking" and "deficit", whereas the language of students from the high socio-economic class is described as “standard” (Labov 1972), and thus privileged (Bernstein 1974).
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Allen, Q. 2012. 'They Think Minority Means Lesser Than': Black Middle-Class Sons and Fathers Resisting Microaggressions in the Schools. Urban Education 48(2): 171-197. Bernstein, Basil. 1974. Class, Codes and Control. New York: Schocken. Essed, P. 1991. Understanding Everyday Racism. London: Sage. Ferguson, A. 1995. Bad Boys: Scholl and the Social Construction of Black Masculinity. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press. Hooks, b. 1991. Yearing: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics. London: Turnaround. Kohli, R. and Solorzano, D. 2012. 'Teachers, Please Learn Our Names!': Racial Microaggressions and the K-12 Classroom. Race Ethnicity and Education 15(4): 441-462. Labov, W. 1972. The Logic of Nonstandard English. In Language and Social Context, ed. Pier Giglioli. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin. Lareau, A. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley: University of California Press. Pollock, M. 2004. Coloemute: Race Talk Dilemma in an American School. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Solorzeno, D. 1998. Critical Race Theory, Race and Gender Microaggressions, and the Experience of Chicana and Chicano Scholars. Qualitative Studies in Education 11(1): 11-136. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication. Sue, D. W., Lin, A., Torino, G., Capodilupo, C., Rivera, D. 2009. Racial Microaggressions and Difficult Dialogues on Race in the Classroom. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology 15(2): 183-190. Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C., Torino, G..; Bucceri, J.,Holder, A.,Nadal, K.,Esquilin,M. 2007. Racial Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Implications for Clinical Practice. American Psychologist 62 (4):271-286. Tyson, K. 2003. Notes from the Back of the Room: Problems and Paradoxes in the Schooling of Young Black Students. Sociology of Education 76(2): 326-342.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.