Session Information
Contribution
This presentation aims to: i. highlight the importance of thinking about the function and effects of images and collective and social imaginaries in policy, governance and collective life; ii. unpack the constitutive effects of some of the images associated with key concepts and ideas in both Prevent and Channel, the British government’s strategies to prevent terrorism; iii. and, finally, appraise the risk of epistemic injustice, in particular testimonial injustice, in implementing these policies and consolidating these imaginaries. It argues that therapeutic/epidemiological images are currently privileged in documentation associated with preventative counter-terrorism approaches in the UK, and that given the scope of indicators outlined in the vulnerability assessment framework used by Channel, an image of children and student subjectivity is being constructed that risks proliferating false positives by identifying students, in particular Muslim students, as potentially vulnerable and ‘at risk’ (of radicalisation). A number of authors have already argued that the Muslim community is being constituted as a ‘suspect community’ (Spalek 2011; Pantazis and Pemberton, 2009, 2011; Kundnani, 2009, 2015; Githen-Mazer, 2009; Hickman, M. et al, 2011; Bonino, 2013; Mythen et al, 2009; Jackson, 2008) and that this is serving to silence people, denying them agency, voice and the opportunity to discuss complex and difficult political and social ideas. Although some philosophers view images as merely an embellishment to concepts rather than inherently significant, others like Gatens and Lloyd (1999), Code (2006) and Fricker (2007) argue that collective and social imaginaries orient our political, social and affective lives, and shape our concepts. Understanding collective imaginaries means thinking about images as constitutive, generative, and productive rather than as descriptive. The reading of Spinoza offered by Gatens and Lloyd (1999) in their book Collective Imaginings is particularly instructive in this regard. The strategies of Prevent and Channel (DCSF, 2008; HM Government 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015) involve, I argue, the expansion of a therapeutic/epidemiological imaginary that pathologises certain subjectivities and focuses on potential future risks rather than real problems, privileging ‘expert’ psychological discourses, whilst conflating extremist and radical ideas with violent methods.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Code, L. (2006) Ecological thinking: The politics of epistemic location (Oxford, Oxford University Press). Coetzee, J.M. (1996) Giving offense: Essays on censorship (Chicago, University of Chicago Press). Durodie, B. (2016) ‘Securitising education to prevent terrorism or losing direction?’, British Journal of Educational Studies, forthcoming. Ecclestone, K. and Hayes, D. (2008) The dangerous rise in therapeutic education (London, Routledge). Forth, C. (2001) ‘Moral contagion and the will’ in Bashford E. and Hooker, C. Contagion (London, Routledge), 61-75. Foucault, M. (2003) Abnormal (London, Picador). Foucault, M. (2005) The Hermeneutics of the Subject (London, Picador). Foucault, M. (2006) Psychiatric Power (New York, Palgrave Macmillan). Foucault, M. (2007) Security, territory, population (London, Palgrave MacMillan). Fricker, M. (2007) Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Gatens, M. and Lloyd, G. (1999) Collective imaginings: Spinoza past and present. (London, Routledge). Gilroy, P. (2004) Postcolonial melancholia. (New York, Columbia University Press). Goffman, E. (1987) Asylums, Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and other Inmates (Arizona, Peregrine Books). Hook, D. (2010) Foucault, Psychology and the Analytics of Power (London, Palgrave). Horgan, J. (2005) The Psychology of Terrorism (London, Routledge). Kundnani, A. (2009) Spooked: How Not to Prevent Violent Extremism, Institute of Race Relations, http://www.irr.org.uk/pdf2/spooked.pdf Accessed 11th December 2014. Kundnani, A. (2012) Radicalisation: The journey of a concept, Race and Class, 54 (2), 3-25. DOI:10.1177/0306396812454984. Kundnani, A. (2014) The Muslims are Coming: Islamophobia, Extremism, and the Domestic War on Terror (New York, Verso). Kundnani, A. (2015) A Decade Lost: Rethinking Radicalisation and Extremism, January http://mabonline.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Claystone-rethinking-radicalisation.pdf Le Bon, G. (2001) The Crowd: A study of the popular mind. (Kitchener, Batoche Books). Le Doeuff, M. (1989) The Philosophical Imaginary (Stanford, Stanford University Press). Orwell, G. (1961) 1984 (New York, NY, Penguin). Sedgwick, M. (2010) The concept of radicalization as a source of confusion, Terrorism and Political Violence, 22 (4), 480–501. Spalek, B. (2011) ‘New’ terrorism and crime prevention initiatives involving young people in the UK: Research and policy contexts, Religion, State and Society, 39 (2), 191-207. Stares, P. and Yaboubian, M. (2007) Terrorism as a disease: An epidemiological model for countering Islamic extremism. (Pittsburgh, Ridgeway Center). Tully, J. (1995). Strange Multiplicity. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.