Service-Learning and Teaching Styles of University Professors
Author(s):
MAR Lorenzo Moledo (presenting / submitting) Miguel Ángel Santos Rego (presenting) Igor Mella Núñez
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 11 D, Teaching and Learning: Practices and Experiences

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-25
17:15-18:45
Room:
NM-J104
Chair:
Pauline Taylor

Contribution

At university level, service-learning is defined as the educational action wherein students, having identified a specific need, perform some form of community service, through which they improve their knowledge of a discipline and increase their sense of social responsibility (Skinner & Chapman, 1999; Bringle & Hatcher, 2000; Puig, 2009).

Service-Learning (SL) is an innovative educational methodology which has been associated, in its definition, application and development, with patterns of cognitive and social improvement of students in general and university students in particular (Ugarte & Naval, 2010).

However, in our opinion, service-learning should not strictly be used as a teaching strategy, for every occasion, when relating to the management of changes aimed at improving quality, student participation (active citizenship) and learning of academic and social skills likely to pave or strengthen the way to employment.

Although the evolution of service-learning in Spanish universities has been slow and reserved, the opportunities provided in our country can be attributed, to a large extent, to changes occurring on a supranational level. The progressive implementation of the EHEA has led to greater sensitivity towards projects focused on teaching improvement, competence-based learning and the importance of students' social and cultural capital in a global world (Santos Rego, 2005).

Different institutional documents are at our disposal, which set out the need for the university to incorporate teaching and learning practices into its training model, which adequately integrate preparation for professional practice and for the exercise of the social responsibility of its students and graduates (Ministry of Education, 2010). Specifically, the Status of University Student in Article 64.3 establishes that universities should encourage practices of social and civic responsibility that combine academic learning in different degree programs, while also providing community service oriented towards improving the quality of life and social inclusion. More recently, the Bucharest Communiqué (2012) has acknowledged the need to promote conditions that improve student-centered learning, innovative teaching methods, as well as a favorable and inspiring working and learning environment.

In any case, it should be acknowledged that during the past decade, in Spain, some steps have been taken aimed at SL surpassing the linking of initiatives of individuals and university innovation groups, and recognizing it as an education practice that is supported by more stable structures within the institution, which has already been raised in neighboring countries (Santos Rego, Sotelino, & Lorenzo Moledo, 2015).

Thus, the main objective of this paper is the study of the knowledge of this methodology among university professors, checking whether that degree of familiarity influences their teaching style. To this end, the research works considered for this study were those which grouped these styles into two models or approaches: teaching-centered orientation and learning-centered orientation (Gargallo, 2008).

At this point, it should be mentioned that the Bologna Declaration implies a clear methodological change in the teaching-learning process, with active and participatory learning-centered methodologies, which also involve a change in teachers' role. Therefore, the focus moves from unidirectional information to interaction, from simply knowing to 'knowing and becoming aware’, from the classroom to its connection to reality, from the exposure of problems to proposing solutions, and from individualistic working structures to more cooperatives models (Martínez, 2006).

Note:This work is supported by a research project funded through a competitive call by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, within the framework of the R & D State Program Societal Challenges: "Service-Learning and Innovation at University Level. A program to improve students' academic performance and social capital" (EDU2013-41687-R)

Method

This is an exploratory, descriptive survey study which analyzes the teaching culture in the Spanish university and how it relates to the service-learning methodology. Participants The research involved a sample of 1916 professors from six (6) Spanish universities, five public and one private: University of Santiago de Compostela (coordinating institution), University of A Coruña, Complutense University of Madrid, University of Cordoba, University of Navarra and University of Valencia. Participating professors represented the five major areas of scientific knowledge: Social and Legal Sciences, Arts and Humanities, Experimental Sciences, Technology, and Health Sciences. Instrument A questionnaire on teaching practice and attitude of university professors towards innovation was designed and subsequently administered between October and December 2015. Professors used the Survey Monkey program (online), with guaranteed anonymity for all participants. Its design initiated from, among others, the CEMEDEPU (Questionnaire to evaluate university professors' teaching and assessment methodology) questionnaire, already validated (Gargallo, 2008). The instrument consists of the following sections: - Biographical questions: a total of 12 questions on their personal and academic-teaching biography including gender, age, administrative/professional status, university and faculty to which they belong, the field of scientific knowledge, degree courses in which they teach, years of teaching experience, positions held at the university, teacher training and membership in any social or civic organizations. - Questions on the course (which best represent their teaching style): four questions which place the teacher in a specific teaching context or situation: type of course, academic year, number of credits and enrolled students. - Three Likert-type scales, with five response options: teaching practice (18 items), social commitment of the university (9 items), and learning activities (11 items). The registered reliability indices are appropriate for both the full scale and each of the subscales. - 5 additional items were included (4 dichotomous and one closed) related to the service-learning methodology.

Expected Outcomes

In Spanish universities positive changes have been observed, due to the implementation of active methodologies in teaching practice, which combine certain academic learning with the provision of some form of community service. There have even been indicators that the institutionalization of service-learning in universities can be improved in the forthcoming years. However, the statements made by such bodies are more credible if they are associated with a plan of action or motivation, no matter how weak the model, aimed at the progressive implementation of this methodology in universities, helping to manage change from a pedagogic perspective, focused on teaching, to one more focused on student learning, paving the way for new modulations in the professors' teaching role. From the available data it can be concluded that university professors, albeit in a moderate manner, become familiarized with this methodology and its potential in training students, in their development as teachers, thus their interest to the community in general, and the university in particular, should be appreciated. Despite the moderate level of employment, the importance of the evident distribution of initiatives in support of SL has become apparent within many universities throughout the country. This has then been translated into the design and development of training programs for their teaching and research staff, encouraging not only individual work, but also communal projects shared between departments and centers. Generally speaking, the professors who reacted positively, whether they implement this methodology, or not, are characterized by a teaching practice focused more on student learning, hoping to reach their students and help them appreciate the relevance of real life training. In this regard, the study refers to professors who are understandably agreeable to this way of thinking and making the constructivist model as their own.

References

Bringle, R.G. & Hatcher, J.A. (2000). Institutionalization of service-learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 71(3), 273-290. Gargallo, B. (2008). Estilos de docencia y evaluación de los profesores universitarios y su influencia sobre los modos de aprender de sus estudiantes. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 241, 425-446. Martínez, M. (2006). Formación para la ciudadanía y educación superior. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación (electronic version), 42. Ministry of Education (2010). Estrategia Universidad 2015. The contribution of universities to Spanish socio-economic progress 2010-2015. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación. Puig, J. M. (coord.) (2009). Aprendizaje Servicio (ApS). Educación y compromiso cívico. Barcelona: Graó. Santos Rego, M.A. (2005). La Universidad ante el proceso de convergencia europea: un desafío de calidad para la Unión. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 230, 5-16. Santos Rego, M.A., Sotelino, A., & Lorenzo Moledo, M. (2015). Aprendizaje-Servicio y misión cívica de la Universidad. Una propuesta de desarrollo. Barcelona: Octaedro. Skinner, R. & Chapman, C. (1999). Service-learning and community service in K-12 public schools. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. Ugarte, C. & Naval, C. (2010) El service-learning, medio adecuado para promover la cooperación social. El caso del programa Create You Own Charity. En C. Naval, S. Lara, C. Ugarte, & Ch. Sádaba (eds) Educar para la comunicación y la cooperación social (pp. 263-281). Pamplona: COAN.

Author Information

MAR Lorenzo Moledo (presenting / submitting)
UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA
SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
Departamento de Teoría de la Educación, Historia de la Educación y Pedagogía Social
Santiago de Compostela
UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA, Spain

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.