How do Portuguese undergraduate students look at assessment? A study in five public universities
Author(s):
Diana Pereira (presenting / submitting) Maria Assunção Flores
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 08 C, Students' Perspectives and Motivations

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-25
09:00-10:30
Room:
NM-J109
Chair:
Gergely Kováts

Contribution

The assessment of the students’ learning has been an issue of concern in higher education (Sambell et al., 1997; Black & Wiliam, 1998; Struyven et al., 2005). Different perspectives suggest that a shift in the assessment paradigm has occurred, based on the transition from an instruction paradigm to a learning paradigm (Barr & Tagg, 1995), from a summative ‘testing culture’ to an integrated ‘assessment culture’ (Birenbaum, 1997), or, in other words, from a teacher-centred approach to a learner-centred approach (Kahl & Venette, 2010). The aim of this paper is to look at the ways in which Portuguese university students look at assessment in higher education taking into account the effectiveness and fairness of both traditional and learner-centred assessment methods, as well their influence on the learning process. Earlier literature suggests that assessment and learning are interconnected (Scouller 1998; Light and Cox 2003) influencing the student learning (Gibbs 1999; Scouller 1998). The way students learn depend on how they think they will be assessed. Assessment influences, either negatively or positively, student learning and may be seen as an incentive for study and for improved performance (Biggs 2003; Brown, Bull and Pendlebury 1997). Consequently, the assessment practices used by university teachers have an important role in the quality of learning (Flores et al. 2014), and need to be creative including a variety of methods (Wen and Tsai 2006). Existing literature also reveals that assessment methods, other than traditional ones, enable more effective learning (Struyven, Dochy and Janssens 2005). These methods encourage the development of autonomy, sense of responsibility, and reflection (Sambell and McDoweel 1998). Also, the approaches to learning may be influenced by the used assessment methods (Marton and Saljo 1997). The assessment methods based on a learner-centred approach (Webber 2012) enhance the development of the skills needed for real life, because the purpose of assessment is to ensure that the success criteria of education and training process are the same as used in practice (Segers and Dochy  2001). In addition, the formative role of assessment is important to improve learning, because it provides students with feedback during their process of learning (Brown, Bull and Pendlebury 1997) making it possible for both students and teachers to get to know how learning is proceeding (Biggs 2003).

 

Method

This paper draws upon a wider piece of research within the context a PhD in Educational Sciences, with a grant from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology - (SFRH/BD/76175/2011). The participants in this study are 624 undergraduate students in five public Portuguese universities. Students were attending the year 3 of different areas in 5 Portuguese Public Universities. In total 634 students participated in this study; 65% are female and 35% are male. Their age ranged between 20 and 61 years old. Most of them are between 20 and 21 years old. In this study the four scientific fields of research identified at the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology were used: Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), Life and Health Sciences (LHS), Natural and Environmental Sciences (NES) and Sciences and Engineering (ESE). Different programmes were selected in each field: SSH: (Educational Sciences, Basic Education, Economics and Law); LHS: (Nursing, Medicine, Pharmacy); NES: (Biology, Geology) and SE: (Mechanical Engineering, Computers Engineering, Biochemistry, Maths). The questionnaire was administered to the students in person. Informed consent and confidentiality was respected in the interviews and questionnaires. A research protocol was sent to each university and department as well as to the Dean of each Faculty in order to request permission to conduct the study. Data were collected between October 2012 and June 2013 in 5 Portuguese Public Universities.

Expected Outcomes

Findings suggest that assessment is seen as more effective and fairer when it is done through the use of learner-centred assessment methods rather than by traditional assessment (e.g. written tests or exams). The students also claim that they devote more time to study when assessment is performed by learner-centred assessment methods than by traditional ones. Furthermore, findings related to assessment through tests and the perceived impact on learning reveal that when students perform a test forget the contents studied, spent less time to study and only study what will be included in the written test and nothing beyond that. The undergraduate students also related the effectiveness of the assessment process to the skills’ development required in real life and the impact on the quality of learning. The participants state that the most used assessment methods are the written tests and oral presentations in group. However, differences in the programmes included in this study were identified as well as differences according to gender. Implications of the findings for assessment, teaching and learning process are discussed.

References

Barr, R., and J. Tagg. 1995. From teaching to learning: a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change 27 (6):12-25. Biggs, J. 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: SHRE and Open University Press. Birenbaum, M. 1997. Assessment preferences and their relationship to learning strategies and orientations. Higher Education 33 (1): 71-84. Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 7-74. Brown, G., J. Bull, and M. Pendlebury. 1997. Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge. Flores, M.A., A.M. Veiga Simão, A. Barros and D. Pereira. 2014. Perceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods: a study in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2014.881348. Gibbs, G. 1999. Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and using diverse approaches, eds. S.Brown and A. Glasner, 41-53. Buckingham: SHRE and Open University Press. Kahl, D., and S. Venette. 2010. To Lecture or Let Go: A Comparative Analysis of Student Speech Outlines from Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Classrooms. Communication Teacher 24 (3): 178-186. Light, G., and R. Cox. 2003. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: The Reflective Professional. London: Sage Publications. Marton, F., and R. Saljo. 1997. Approaches to learning. In The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education, eds. F.Marton, D.Hounsell and N. Entwistle, 39-58. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press. Sambell, K., and L. McDowell. 1998. The values of self and peer assessment to the developing lifelong learner. In Improving Student Learning: Improving Students as Learners, ed. C. Rust, 56-66. Oxford:Oxford Center for Staff and Learning Development. Scouller, K.M. 1998. The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examinations versus assignment essay. Higher Education 35 (4):453-472. Segers, M., and F. Dochy. 2001. New assessment forms in problem based learning: the value-added of the students‘ perspective. Studies in Higher Education 26 (3): 327-343. Struyven, K., F. Dochy, and S. Janssens. 2005 Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (4): 331–347. Webber, K. 2012. The Use of Learner-Centered Assessment in US Colleges and Universities. Research in Higher Education 53 (2): 201-228. Wen, M. L., and C.C. Tsai. 2006. University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education 51 (1): 27-44.

Author Information

Diana Pereira (presenting / submitting)
University of Minho
Institute of Education
Braga
University of Minho, Portugal

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.