06 SES 01, Digital Innovation and Challenges
ICT in education has been on the agenda for educational authorities for a little more than 30 years. Much water has passed under the bridge since then. The educational technologies have changed significantly. In the public domain the presumption that ICT is a necessary and innovative tool for change of education has been firmly rooted in the public opinion. The idea that ICT is a crucial element in the strive to secure better and more significant learning processes is now a fundamental idea in our thinking about how upbringing and socialisation takes place in the technological context of our society.
However, simultaneously, it seems like the educational system is slightly out of sync with how the technological development actually happens and how the educational authorities describe its omnipotence and necessity. One might say that the actual practices in the area represent a “cultural lagging” in the sense that authorities as well as researchers to a very small degree manage to demonstrate and furnish the ambitions and visions expressed in policy papers, with substance.
The positions enthusiasts and sceptics to this high investments - and meager results - take, differs on many points. Enthusiasts regard the field of common teachers and institutions who fail to implement new technological methods and practices at the desired pace as a conservative and unwilling grassroot that will resist changes as long as possible. They no not know their own best. Their response is to invest more and attack the problem from new angles with even more sophisticated technologies in order to finally prove how ICT accelerates learning and develop skills for the future society.
The sceptics think of this “cultural lag” as a proof of how ICT in education consistently will fail to address teaching and learning in productive ways, that the technologies are “oversold” - and therefore “underused” for very good reasons. The arguments behind the ICT investments in education are not solicited and will never be proved to hold its promises.
In between these two positions are the ICT-neutrals. They claim that the persistent problem of using ICT in education is only to be expected because it represents a very slow type of reform. All initiatives of this sort and magnitude will always “lag behind” because institutions change at a much lower pace than reformers intend to.
This research project takes the position of the ICT-neutral as its point of departure.The aim is to provide an overview and summary of how successful the policies of ICT in education is considered to be, and thereby provide a platform for choices and stances for future policies in this area. To our knowledge there hardly exist any ambitious and encompassing analysis of policies in this area and their effects, in Norway nor internationally. We find it necessary to cover topics like these:
- The actors: Who were the leading initiators and providers of ideas and strategies in the various areas that were involved: researchers, politicians, bureaucrats.
- Their arguments and discourses: How did they identify the dominating ideas in the first place, and how where these ideas chained and connected to a form a more consistent and convincing set of arguments?
- The magnitude of investments: Over time, how expensive has this development been, and how can we calculate the costs in various areas?
- Results: How have the educational authorities or researchers documented the results of the investments. What were their methods, and how did they frame their results as issues of cause and effects, motivations and intentions.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines. The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38 (1), 9-24. Olson, J. (2000). Trojan horse or teacher’s pet? Computers and the culture of schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32 (1), 1-8. Saettler, P. (2004). Evolution of American Educational Technology. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73. Selwyn, N. (2011). Schools and Schooling in the Digital Age. A critical analysis. Oxon: Routledge.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.