Training first year Students University in the development of generic competences
Author(s):
Antonio Medina Rivilla (presenting / submitting) Mª. Concepción Domínguez (presenting) María Medina
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 09 C, Educational Innovation & Training

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-25
13:30-15:00
Room:
NM-J109
Chair:
Carolina Guzmán-Valenzuela

Contribution

The research is founded on the challenge of higher Education based on the development of key competencies of students, with emphasis on the first university course.

During the past year it was developed an educational innovation aimed at training students in the competencies: Professional Identity, Innovation, Communication and Methodology. It has been consolidated a set of tasks and new forms of presentation and analysis on the digital platform ALF at UNED. It has applied the methodology of narrative and generation of self-reporting by the 28 students in response to the activities presented. Analyses were conducted with software Atlas Ti 6.2, confirming the relevance of all decisions of teachers and students and their recognition in advancement, improvement and development of mentioned competencies.

The research focused on improving the education of students in key competencies is essential to respond to the challenges of autonomy and training of students as future professionals and to the decision making in the European Horizon 2020. The aim that guides this research is to discover the most relevant learning activities to develop the key competencies of students in the first year of university in the field of education.

The education of university students in the first year has a singular dedication of teachers to achieve progress in the key competencies that are the basis for success in future professional life. The expected learning outcomes specified in the singular achievements: transfer, objectives of labor market essential to progress in the mastery of the competencies.

Cohen and Malin (2010.19) emphasize "different forms of secondary education, including general and vocational education, essential to Higher Education, details the aims of Education:

-        The development of child’s personality, talents and mental and physical abilities.

-        Respect for human rights and fundamental freedom and for the principles”.

In this line, Reimers (2010, 188) defines Global Competency through various dimensions:

-        Includes attitudes, values and skills, to international and global value framework.

-        Foreign language skills.

-        Disciplinary knowledge and comparative fields: history, anthropology. Economic, etc.

Salganik and Stephen (2010, 279), in education key competencies are often associated with broadening of both general and vocational education and also with reforming education for social renewal. In others countries, key competencies have been used in national expressions of the goals of education “key competencies as a means to promote increasing the opportunities for workers”.

Brennald, Jary and Houston (2010, 135), “there is now quite substantial research evidence to indicate that UK graduates are far less likely than their counterparts from other European countries to utilize their knowledge and skills in subsequent employments”. The authors consider the student identity (2010, 137), “for some students, higher education is about the acquisition of a  disciplinary or subject identity- becoming an historian, a sociologist, law, biochemical, etc.

The training of Freshmen University has been the main concern of many networks of teaching innovation in Spain. Thus, Medina, Dominguez and Sanchez (2013); Dominguez, Levi, Medina and Ramos (2014); Medina et al, (2013); De Wit, Heerwegh and Verhoeven (2012) note that educational processes have to adapt to the uniqueness of each student and equipment as well as  implement methods aimed at solving problems and designing new projects.

These contributions highlight the value of the activities as an essential element of the curricula, to facilitate the training of students in competencies: professional identity, innovation, methodology, entrepreneurship, etc.

Method

Achieving the intended objective requires a methodological option that combines quantitative and qualitative methods, but the intensity of progress in the competencies of each student, requires greater intensity of use of some qualitative methods. -Narrative (Chase, 2011). Drafting and solution of the tasks proposed to develop the competencies selected. -Autobiographical narratives of students, individually with option to do it in pairs (Denzin, 2014). -Adaptation case study of this research design (Flyvbjerg, 2011). -Use of ALF (UNED) digital platform that retakes and stores the data presented by the students (e-portfolio). The content analysis was carried out using the software ATLAS Ti 6.2, summarizing the main findings of the students and tutors involved in this educational innovation, we present synthetically one network for competency, as expression of students actions. The application of qualitative method: narratives of professional experiences, is stated as the most suitable and innovative for progress in the mastery of basic competencies, given its adaptation to the necessary integration of knowledge practices, performances, ways of being and impact, which are the real content and meaning of competencies in the training of university students and its emphasis on new teaching performance.

Expected Outcomes

The first findings are in coherence with Cohen and Malin (2010), stressing the value of personality and skills of students, expanding the vision of Salganik and Stephen (2010), noting that "Key competencies as a mean to Promote Increasing Opportunities for the workers; Also we found that mastering the competencies developed by the students, is linked to progress in the basic understanding of the teaching models, which constitute the conceptual basis of the discipline of didactic that students work, which is essential to train them in the identity with their future profession and create the foundation for innovation in educational processes. The main expected outcomes will be: - Identify relevant activities which have facilitated the development of competencies mentioned. We have highlighted the following activities to master them: -Narratives of innovative professional experiences. -Self-analysis of characteristic activities and problems of the future profession. -Identification of professional, family and institutional models linked to the mastery of the competencies. -Design of personal and autonomous practices that show the interests of each student, dyads and teams. -Formulation of projects linked to new work styles and decision making in the future organizations and training institutions. -It is found that freshmen of university have discovered the value and meaning of basic competencies by building their development pipeline as an apprentice the culture and style of being university. -It is necessary to intensify the processes of motivation and initiation into the life and ways of being university student, acquiring a style of learning and commitment to the values and characteristics of higher education institutions.

References

Brennan, J., Jary, D. and Houston, M. (2010). What else students learned at University. In J. Brennan, R. Edmunds, M. Houston, D. Jary, Y. Lebeau, M. Osborne and J.T.E. Richardson, Improving what is learned in University. New York, Routledge, 135-156. Cohen, J. E. and Malin M.B. (2010), Educational Goods: Art, Science, Love and importance of Binocular Vision. In J.E. Cohen and M.B. Malin (Eds.) International Perspectives on the Goals of Universal Basis and Secondary Education. New York-London Routledge, 246-251. Chase, S. F. (2011). Narrative Inquiring: still a fried in the marketing. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California, 421-434. Denzin, N. K.(2014). Interpretative Autoethnography. Thousand Oaks, California. De Wit, K. and Heerwegh, D. and Verhoeven, J. C. (2012). Do ICT competences support educational attainment at University? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11, 1-25. Domínguez, M.C. Leví, G., Medina, A. and Ramos, E. (2014). Las competencias docentes: diagnóstico y actividades innovadoras para su desarrollo en un modelo de educación a distancia. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 12(1), 239-267. Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case Study. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California, 301-3106. Medina, A., Domínguez, M.C. y Sánchez, C. (2013. Evaluación de las competencias de los estudiantes: modelos y técnicas para la valoración. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 31(1), 239-255. Medina, A. et al, (2013). Formación del profesorado: actividades innovadoras para el dominio de las competencias docentes. Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces. Reimers, F. (2010). Educating for Global Competency. In J.E. Cohen and M.B. Malin (Eds.) International Perspectives on the Goals of Universal Basis and Secondary Education. New York-London Routledge, 183-202. Salganik, L. H. and Stephen, J. P. (2010). The Challenge of Defining a Quality Universal Education In J.E. Cohen and M.B. Malin (Eds.) International Perspectives on the Goals of Universal Basis and Secondary Education. New York-London Routledge, 252-286.

Author Information

Antonio Medina Rivilla (presenting / submitting)
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
Didáctica, Organización Escolar y Didácticas Especiales
Madrid
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Spain
Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, Spain

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.